Neighborliness

Click to listen to this teaching.

 

A Quality of Discipleship – Neighborliness

 Luke 10:25 – 27.

 

Introduction.  The parable of the Good Samaritan is one of the most famous stories Jesus ever told.  It has inspired the building of hospitals, orphanages, homes for the infirmed, and has raised more money for them and similar organizations than any others ever written.  Yet its familiarity can dull its sharp edge.  Jesus told this story not merely to warm our hearts but to search them, to challenge our assumptions about who counts as a neighbor, ad to call us to a radical obedience that crosses every barrier we prefer to maintain.

The context: A lawyer’s test and the desire to justify himself.

The encounter begins when an expert in the law – an educated scribed trained in the Torah – stands up to test Jesus.  This probably sounded like a good idea to the scribe, but it’s never a good idea to test the Lord like this.  His questions sound so spiritual:  “Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”  Luke doesn’t tell us that the motive behind this test was really to expose our Lord as unorthodox or to draw Him into a debate.

Jesus responds with a question of His own:  “What is written in the Law?  How do you read it?”  The lawyer responds correctly, citing the Shema from Deuteronomy 6:5 –

Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.  (Deuteronomy 6:5 | TNIV)

 And then joins it to the command of Leviticus 19:18 –

” ‘Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord.’”  (Leviticus 19:18 | TNIV)

That was truly an impressive answer, and Jesus acknowledges it.  This expert in the law knew the right words.  He could quote the greatest commandments with precision.  But knowing the right words and living them are not the same thing.  Sensing the gap, the lawyer asks a clever follow-up question designed to limit his responsibility:  “And who is my neighbor?”

This is the pivotal moment.  He is not seeking deeper insight; he is seeking to justify himself.  He wants Jesus to define the boundaries of “neighbor” so that his obligation to love remains manageable.  It may have been that he was hoping for a definition limited to fellow Jews who kept the Law, members of his own religious circle, or at least those ho were not obvious sinners.  If the circle is drawn tightly enough, obedience becomes feasible and he can feel good about himself.

But Jesus doesn’t play games.  He refuses to define “neighbor” as a restricted category.  Instead the Lord tells a story that redefines what it means to BE a neighbor – whoever the person in need may be.

A dangerous road and an anonymous victim.

Jesus, the master story teller, sets the scene on a real and dangerous road:  The 17 mile-descent from Jerusalem to Jericho, dropping nearly 3,000 feet through rocky, desolate terrain filled with caves and hiding places.  It was notorious for robberies.  Travelers who could traveled in groups for safety.  This man, however, was alone.

In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead.”  (Luke 10:30 | TNIV)

Notice how Jesus describes him:  Simply “a man.”  He was a man with no name, no nationality, no religion, no moral record.  He is Everyman in his vulnerability – stripped of his dignity and protection, beaten into helplessness, left half dead.  In that condition, he is also ritually unclean.  Anyone who touches him, especially if he dies in the process, becomes defiled and unable to perform religious duties until purified.  This man is the ultimate inconvenient, burdensome person.

Enter the religious professionals.

A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. [32] So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side.  (Luke 10:31, 32 | TNIV)

These are not cartoon villains.  They are highly respected leaders.  The priest had likely been serving in the Temple in Jerusalem.  The Levite assisted in worship as a musician, attendant, or guard.  They both knew the Scriptures well.  They both taught the Law.  They represented the people before God.

And yet, when they saw the half-dead man, they crossed to the other side of the road and walked on by.  The text doesn’t speculate on their motives, but reasonable inferences include fear for their own safety (if the robbers were hiding), concern for ritual purity (contact with blood or a corpse would defile the for Temple service), the pressure of religious duties that made stopping inconvenient, or simply the human tendency to look away from suffering that would cost us something.

Their failure was not active cruelty.  It was the quieter, more respectable sin of omission.  They saw a clear need and chose not to get involved.  They kept their robes clean and their schedules intact, but they failed the test of love that their precious Law itself required.

Enter the Samaritan who showed what neighborliness really looks like.

But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him.  (Luke 10:33 | TNIV)

Here is the great shock of the parable.  A Samaritan of all people.  For Jesus’ Jewish listeners, this was almost a contradiction.  Samaritans were viewed as half-breeds and heretics.  Centuries earlier, after the Assyrian conquest of Israel, intermarriage took place, and they had established their own worship center of Mount Gerizim rather than acknowledging Jerusalem.  Consequently, Jews and Samaritans both avoided each other like the plague.  In the very recent context of Luke 9:51 – 56, the disciples had wanted to call down fire from heaven on a Samaritan village that rejected Jesus.  No one in the audience would have expected the hero of a story about mercy to be a Samaritan.

Yet, this is the man who sees and acts.  “He took pity on him.”  The Greek verb comes from the word for bowels or inner parts.  It describes a deep, visceral, gut-level compassion – the same strong word used of Jesus when He saw the crowds or the needy widow of Nain.  This isn’t mild sympathy from a safe distance.  It’s a movement of the whole person that refuses to let him walk away.

What follows in one of the most detailed pictures of practical, costly mercy in all of Scripture.  The Samaritan doesn’t just feel compassion; he pours himself out.

  • He went to him.  He didn’t shout instructions from across the road or throw money at him.   He approached the place of danger and got close to the suffering.
  • He bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine.  Oil to soothe and protect the wounds, wine to cleanse as an antiseptic – the best first-aid measures available.  He used his own limited resources on stranger from a hostile people.
  • He put the man on his own donkey.  Now the Samaritan is walking while the injured man rides.  He gives up his own comfort and means of transportation.
  • He brought him to an inn and took care of him.  He didn’t drop the man off at the door and leave.  He stayed through the night, personally nursing him back from the edge of death.

The next day, the Samaritan took out two denarii – roughly two days’ wages for a common laborer – and gave them to the innkeeper with clear instructions.

‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’  (Luke 10:35b | TNIV)

He makes an open-ended financial commitment and promises to return to settle accounts.  He takes personal responsibility for the man’s full recovery with no guarantee that the innkeeper will be honest or that the man will survive.

This is neighborliness in action:  Personal, sacrificial, practical, ongoing, and extended without regard to whether the recipient could ever repay or even belonged to the “right” group.

The quality of neighborliness redefined.

 “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”  (Luke 10:36 | TNIV)

It’s a natural question Jesus asks the lawyer, and the lawyer answered honestly, but he can’t bring himself to say the word “Samaritan.”

The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.” Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”  (Luke 10:37 | TNIV)

In a single sentence, Jesus has transformed the entire conversation.  The lawyer wanted to know the bare minimum – who counts as my neighbor so I know whom I am required to love.  Jesus answers by showing what love looks like when it’s real and alive.  Neighborliness is not a label we place on certain approved people; it’s a way of life we choose to live toward anyone in need.  It’s not defined by identity or worthiness of the other person but by the response of the one who sees suffering and refuses to pass by on the other side.

This quality is essential to true discipleship for several reasons.

First, neighborliness fulfills the law of love that the lawyer himself quoted.  The apostle Paul later wrote this in Galatians 5:14 –

For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”  (Galatians 5:14 | TNIV)

James calls it “the royal law.”  And John says that that if we know a brother or sister is in need but don’t do anything to help them, then the love of God can’t be in us.  We can’t claim to love the God we can’t see while refusing to love the brother or sister we can see who is in distress.

Second, neighborliness crosses every barrier the world considers decisive.  The Samaritan helped a Jew despite centuries of hostility and despite the fact that Jews generally despised Samaritans.  In our own context, genuine neighborliness may require us to s how mercy to some one we don’t like, someone from a different political party, a different economic class, a different racial or ethnic background, or someone whose lifestyle or choices we find offensive.  It doesn’t require us to approve of sin or to compromise Biblical truth.  It does require us to refuse to let those differences become an excuse for indifference or contempt.

Third, neighborliness is costly.  The priest and the Levite counted the cost – possible danger, possible defilement, possible disruption of their plans and reputation – and decided it was too high.  The Samaritan counted the same cost and paid it gladly. Real mercy will sometimes cost us time we don’t have, money we could spend on other things, emotional energy, or even our standing with certain people.  When we help “the wrong person,” some may criticize us.  Jesus never promised that following Him would be convenient or popular.

Fourth, neighborliness flows from the Gospel we have received.  We must be honest with ourselves:  Left to our own fallen nature, we are far more like the priest and the Levite than the Samaritan.  We have all passed by on the other side at times – out of fear, busyness, prejudice, or simple selfishness.  The glorious news is that Jesus is the true and Good Samaritan.  When we were spiritual beaten down by sin, stripped of righteousness, and left half-dead, He didn’t pass us by.  He came to us.  He bound up our wounds at the infinite cost of His own blood.  He carried us when we couldn’t walk.  He paid the full price for our healing and continues to care for us as our Great High Priest and Shepherd.  Because we have received such undeserved and costly mercy, the Spirit of Christ now lives in us and produces the fruit of mercy toward others.  We love because He first loved us.

Conclusion.  Neighborliness stands as a culminating and essential mark of those who follow Jesus.  It really is just basic obedience to the command of the Lord.  May the Holy Spirit open our eyes to see the half dead people God places in our path this week.  May He soften our hearts to feel their pain with something of the gut-level compassion that moved the Samaritan and that moved our Savior to many in need.  May He strengthen our hands to bind up wounds, our feet to walk the extra mile, and our resources to meet real needs without partiality.  And may He give us the courage to do it even when it is inconvenient, costly, or unpopular.

For when we live this way, we are not just being nice people or good citizens.  We are showing the world what Jesus looks like.  We are proving the kingdom of God has come near.  And we are demonstrating that we truly are disciples of the One who did not pass us by when we were in desperate need but came to us at a great cost.

Three Minutes With Mike

How Should a Christian Vote?

Click to listen to this teaching.

 

Voting as a Disciple of Christ: Biblical Principles for the American Christian

The question “How should I, as an American Christian, vote?” is not first a political question. It is a discipleship question. It belongs in the same category as “How should I speak?” “How should I use my money?” and “How should I treat my neighbor?” Scripture does not give Americans a party platform, a candidate scorecard, or a list of approved ballot measures. It does give something better and more demanding: a coherent set of principles rooted in the character of God, the lordship of Christ, and the calling of the church in the world. Those principles are sufficient to guide a believer’s conscience in the voting booth.

Dual Citizenship and the Limits of Earthly Power

The Christian lives as a citizen of two kingdoms at once. Philippians 3:20 declares that “our citizenship is in heaven,” and yet Paul himself used his Roman citizenship when it advanced the gospel (Acts 22:25–29; 25:10–12). Jesus acknowledged the legitimacy of Caesar’s coin while refusing to grant Caesar ultimate allegiance: “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Matthew 22:21). The state is real, temporary, and limited. God is eternal and absolute.

Romans 13:1–7 and 1 Peter 2:13–17 establish that governing authorities are instituted by God and that Christians are to be subject to them for the Lord’s sake. The same passages also set boundaries. Authorities exist to punish evil and approve what is good. When they invert that purpose—rewarding evil and punishing good—they forfeit the moral claim to unqualified obedience. The apostles themselves modeled this when they said, “We must obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). Voting is one of the ordinary means by which American citizens participate in the ordering of authority. It is therefore an act of stewardship, not of ultimate trust.

The Character of God and the Measure of Public Policy

Scripture repeatedly grounds public justice in the character of God Himself. Psalm 89:14 says, “Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne.” Proverbs 14:34 states, “Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people.” Micah 6:8 summarizes the Lord’s requirement: “to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God.” These are not private virtues only. They are public standards by which nations and rulers are measured.

Several concrete priorities emerge from the biblical witness.

First, the protection of human life made in the image of God. Genesis 1:27 and 9:6 establish the unique dignity of every human being. The consistent biblical pattern is that the shedding of innocent blood brings guilt upon a land (Numbers 35:33; Proverbs 6:16–17). Policies that treat the unborn, the elderly, the disabled, or the weak as expendable stand in direct conflict with this truth. A Christian cannot treat the deliberate destruction of innocent human life as a secondary or negotiable issue.

Second, the defense of truth and the restraint of evil. Romans 13 assigns the sword to the magistrate for the punishment of wrongdoers. Governments that refuse to restrain violence, that redefine crime, or that punish those who speak truth invert their God-given function. Isaiah 5:20 warns against those who “call evil good and good evil.” A vote that advances the normalization of what God calls sin or that suppresses the free proclamation of the gospel is a vote against the moral order God has established.

Third, the integrity of the family and the protection of children. Genesis 2:24, Ephesians 5–6, and the repeated Old Testament concern for the next generation show that the household is the primary unit of human society under God. Policies that undermine the creational pattern of marriage, that confuse children about their identity as male or female, or that remove parental authority over the moral and spiritual formation of their children attack an institution God Himself ordained.

Fourth, religious liberty as the necessary condition for gospel faithfulness. The early church did not seek political power in the modern sense, but it insisted on the freedom to preach Christ. When that freedom is restricted, the church’s primary calling is hindered. A Christian electorate that treats the free exercise of religion as optional or subordinate to other cultural goals has forgotten the priority of the Great Commission.

Fifth, justice for the poor and the vulnerable without the abandonment of personal responsibility. The prophets repeatedly condemn the powerful who crush the weak (Amos 5:11–12; Isaiah 10:1–2). At the same time, Scripture never treats material poverty as the root problem or the state as the primary solution. The biblical pattern is work, family, voluntary generosity, and the local church’s care for its own (2 Thessalonians 3:10; 1 Timothy 5:3–16; Acts 6). Policies that destroy the incentives for work, that break up families, or that replace the church’s diaconal ministry with permanent dependence fail both the justice and the mercy tests of Scripture.

Sixth, the limited nature of government and the danger of concentrated power. The tower of Babel narrative (Genesis 11) and the repeated warnings against kings who multiply power and wealth for themselves (Deuteronomy 17:14–20; 1 Samuel 8) caution against the concentration of authority that claims near-divine competence. American constitutional limits on government are not biblical in origin, yet they align with the biblical recognition that human rulers are fallen and must be restrained.

The Practical Act of Voting

How, then, does a Christian vote?

Begin with prayer and the fear of the Lord. 1 Timothy 2:1–2 commands prayer for “kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way.” Voting without prayer is presumption. Voting driven primarily by anger, fear, or tribal loyalty is idolatry of another kind.

Inform your conscience with Scripture before you inform it with news cycles or party messaging. Ask of every candidate and every measure: Does this advance or hinder the protection of innocent life? Does it uphold or erode the truth about human nature, marriage, and sexuality? Does it expand or contract the freedom of the church to preach and live according to the Word? Does it strengthen or weaken the family as the basic unit of society? Does it restrain evil or reward it? Does it treat citizens as image-bearers responsible before God or as clients of the state?

Recognize that every ballot is a trade-off in a fallen world. Perfect candidates do not exist. The question is never “Which option is sinless?” but “Which available option more nearly approximates the justice and righteousness God requires of rulers?” Sometimes the choice is between greater and lesser evils. Scripture does not forbid such choices; it requires wisdom (Proverbs 2:6–15). Refusing to vote when one option is clearly more aligned with biblical justice is not neutrality; it is a decision that cedes the field to the other side.

Refuse the false gospel of political salvation. Psalm 146:3 warns, “Put not your trust in princes.” No election will usher in the kingdom of God. No party is the church. The Christian who treats electoral victory as the primary hope of the nation has already begun to shift trust from the Lord to the arm of flesh. At the same time, the Christian who treats political engagement as worldly and beneath spiritual people has forgotten that God cares about justice in the public square and that believers are called to seek the welfare of the city in which they live (Jeremiah 29:7).

Hold the results with open hands. Daniel served under pagan kings. Joseph administered under Pharaoh. The early church thrived under emperors who would later kill them. God’s sovereignty is not suspended when the wrong candidate wins. The church’s mission continues. Faithfulness is measured by obedience in the circumstances God assigns, not by the scoreboard of elections.

Common Objections Answered

Some argue that “Jesus never voted, so neither should we.” Jesus lived under Roman occupation without democratic franchise. The apostles lived under the same system. The argument from silence fails. When providence grants a people the lawful means to influence the character of their government, the principles of stewardship and neighbor-love require the use of those means.

Others claim that single-issue voting is simplistic. Scripture itself is not multi-issue in the modern sense when foundational matters of life, truth, and religious liberty are at stake. The prophets did not balance the shedding of innocent blood against economic prosperity. They declared the former an abomination that brought judgment. Hierarchy among issues is not optional; it is required by the relative weight Scripture itself assigns.

Still others insist that the church must remain silent on public questions to avoid alienating people. The prophets, Jesus, and the apostles never accepted that counsel. Faithfulness sometimes costs influence. Silence in the face of clear evil is itself a form of complicity.

Conclusion: The Vote as an Act of Faithful Presence

An American Christian votes as one who knows that the real King is already on the throne. He or she votes as a steward who will give an account for the use of every resource, including the franchise. He or she votes with the recognition that government is a limited, temporary servant of God, not the savior of the world. The decisive criteria are those Scripture itself supplies: the protection of life made in God’s image, the upholding of truth against the lie, the defense of the family, the preservation of religious liberty, the restraint of evil, and the pursuit of justice that does not abandon personal responsibility or the primacy of the local church.

No algorithm or party loyalty can replace the hard work of applying these principles in a particular election. That work belongs to the individual conscience informed by the Word, prayer, and the counsel of mature believers. The goal is not to baptize any political movement. The goal is to act, in the public square, as those who fear God more than they fear men, who love their neighbors enough to seek their true good, and who trust the Lord of history with the outcome.

In the end, the Christian’s deepest confidence is not that the right people will always hold office, but that Jesus Christ is Lord of lords and King of kings, and that every knee will bow to Him. Voting is one small act of obedience on the way to that day. Do it prayerfully, do it carefully, do it in the fear of God, and then rest in the sovereignty of the One who raises up and removes kings according to His own wise purposes.

Three Minutes With Mike


Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 412,837 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 277 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket