Two Paths of Human Experience

Click play to listen to this teaching.

TEN PSALMS THAT WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE

 Psalm 1 – The Two Paths of Human Experience

Introduction.  Human life is a series of choices that shape experience.  Every person walks a path marked by influence, desire, and ultimate outcome.  Psalm 1 places two paths side-by-side and invites us to examine them without illusion.  This psalm isn’t abstract theology but the lived realities of blessing and blight.  The psalm opens the entire Psalter declaring that the quality of life is determined by what a person pursues, what person refuses, and what ultimately results.  In the language of our series, it’s a study drawn straight out of human experience – the experience of the godly and the experience of the ungodly.

The blessedness of the godly.

Blessed are those who do not walk in step with the wicked or stand in the way that sinners take or sit in the company of mockers, [2] but who delight in the law of the Lord and meditate on his law day and night. [3] They are like a tree planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in season and whose leaf does not wither—whatever they do prospers.  (Psalm 1:1 – 3 | TNIV)

The refusals, Psalm 1:1

The psalm begins with a single, weighty word:  Blessed.  The Hebrew term carries the idea of deep happiness, favor, and enviable well-being.  It’s not a temporary feeling but a settled condition of life under God’s smile.  This blessedness belongs to a particular kind of person – the only who has made deliberate choices about influence and affection.

Blessed are those who do not walk in step with the wicked or stand in the way that sinners take or sit in the company of mockers…  (Psalm 1:1 | TNIV)

The description of the blessed person begins with three refusals.  Notice the progression:  Walking, standing, and sitting.  These are not random verbs; they describe a deepening involvement with evil.

First comes walking “in step with the wicked.”  Walking speaks of the ordinary direction of life, the daily pattern of thought and behavior.  The wicked are those who live as though God doesn’t exist or doesn’t matter.  To walk in step with them is to adopt their values, their goals, and their definitions of success.  The blessed person refuses that cadence.  He will not allow the prevailing culture to set the rhythm of his steps.

Second comes the standing “in the way that sinners take.”  Standing implies a more settled posture.  This person has slowed down, paused, and taken a position.  The “way of sinners” is the well-worn path of those who deliberately miss the mark of God’s will.  To stand there is to linger, to consider, to become comfortable with sin as a viable option.  The blessed person refuses even that pause.  He will not plant his feet where the direction of life is already set away from God.

Third comes sitting “in the company of mockers.”  Sitting is the posture of settled residence.  Mockers are those who treat the things of God with contempt – who sneer at holiness, ridicule faith, and find pleasure in undermining the truth.  To sit with them is to make oneself at home in an atmosphere of cynicism and unbelief.  The blessed person refuses a seat.  He will not make himself comfortable among those who despise what God loves.

These three refusals form a fence or a protective boundary.  Human experience shows how easily influence works.  We rarely plunge headlong into open rebellion over night.  We walk a little, then stand a little longer, then finally sit down and belong.  The blessed person has learned to say NO early and firmly.  He understands that the company we keep shapes the people we become.  In a culture saturated with voices that mock righteousness and celebrate self-will, this refusal is not optional; it’s the mark of a life lived under God’s blessing.

The pursuits, 1:2.

…but who delight in the law of the Lord and meditate on his law day and night.  (Psalm 1:2 | TNIV)

That little word “but” looks small but it’s a big word and it’s crucial.  The blessed life is not defined just by what it avoids but also by it embraces.  The same person who refuses the counsel of the wicked finds his positive delight in the law of the Lord.

“Delight” is a very strong word in the original.  It’s not a grim duty or a reluctant obligation.  It’s sheer pleasure, satisfaction, and eager affection.  The law of the Lord – the revealed will and Word of God – has become the object of the heart’s gladness.  This isn’t the response of a person who merely tolerates Scripture; it’s the response of one who has tasted its goodness and just can’t get enough.

The delight expresses itself in meditation “day and night.”  Meditation here has nothing to do with emptying the mind or repeating a mantra; it’s fill the mind with words:  God’s Word.  It’s the deliberate turning over of God’s Word in the mind and heart, the slow chewing that extracts nourishment.  Day and night means the Word is never far from thought.  It shapes the first considerations of the morning and the last reflections of the evening.  It becomes the grid through which decisions are filtered and the lens through which life is interpreted.

This pursuit is the positive counterpart to earlier refusals.  The person who delights in God’s law or God’s Word has something better to occupy the mind than the counsel of the ungodly.  The vacuum left by rejecting wicked influence is filled with the living Word.  Human experience confirms this principle:  Whatever captures our affection will eventually capture our attention, and whatever captures our attention will shape our character.  The blessed person has chosen to let the law of the Lord capture both.

The rewards, 1:3.

They are like a tree planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in season and whose leaf does not wither—whatever they do prospers.  (Psalm 1:3 | TNIV)

The image shifts from the moral description of the person to the vivid picture of a tree.  This isn’t a wild tree that happens to grow near water; it’s a tree that has been “planted.”  There is intention and placement in the image.  God has set the righteous person in a position of continuous supply.

Streams of water speak of steady, reliable nourishment.  In the dry climate of the ancient Near East, a tree near a constant water source was a striking sight.  Its roots reaching down to what is life-giving, and the results are visible:  Fruit in season, leaves that don’t whither and fall off, and overall health and prosperity.  Fruitfulness is not frantic or forced; it comes “in season,” or at the proper time.  There is a divine timing to the yield.  The leaf that doesn’t whither speaks of sustained vitality even when external conditions are harsh.  And that final phrase, “whatever they do prospers,” doesn’t mean a trouble-free existence or guaranteed material success.  It means that the whole course of life, under God’s hand, moves toward the fulfillment of His good purposes.

This is the reward of the blessed life.  It’s not flashy or immediate.  It’s deep, steady, and enduring.  Human experience is full of people who chase quick results and temporary thrills.  The tree planted by streams of water stands as a quiet rebuke to that frenzy.  Real blessing is measured over time by rootedness, fruitfulness, and resilience.  The person who refuses the world’s counsel and delights in God’s Word becomes, by God’s grace, a living illustration of stability in an unstable world.

The blight of the ungodly.

Not so the wicked! They are like chaff that the wind blows away. [5] Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous. [6] For the Lord watches over the way of the righteous, but the way of the wicked will be destroyed.  (Psalm 1:4 – 6 | TNIV)

Psalm 1 turns sharply.  The contrast is deliberate and sobering.  What has been said of the godly is not at all true of the ungodly.  Their experience is the opposite in every decisive way.

The worthlessness of the ungodly, vs 4.

Not so the wicked! They are like chaff that the wind blows away.  (Psalm 1:4 | TNIV)

The words “Not so” ring with finality.  Everything just described – the delight, the rootedness, the fruitfulness – in no way applies to the wicked.  Instead of a planted tree, they are compared to chaff.

Chaff is the light, dry husk that surrounds the grain.  In the ancient process of winnowing, the harvested grain was tossed up into the air so that the wind could carry the worthless chaff away while the heavier grain fell back to the threshing floor.  Chaff has no substance, no root, no lasting value.  It is weightless and temporary.

This is really bad news for the ungodly – it’s how God views them.  From the outside, the life of the ungodly may appear substantial, filled with activity, influence, and apparent success.  Yet in God’s evaluation, it’s all chaff.  It lacks the weight of eternal significance.  It’s driven by every shifting wind of culture, opinion, and desire.  When the testing winds of judgment come, the ungodly life can’t remain.

Human experience repeatedly proves the point.  Lives built solely on human wisdom, self-interest, or the approval of the age, eventually reveal their emptiness.  Accomplishments that once seem impressive prove unable to sustain the soul.  The image of chaff isn’t meant to be cruel. It is, in fact, honest.  It forces us to ask what, in the end, will remain when the wind of God’s assessment blows through a life.

The insecurity of the ungodly, 1:5, 6.

Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous. [6] For the Lord watches over the way of the righteous, but the way of the wicked will be destroyed.  (Psalm 1:5, 6 | TNIV)

The “Therefore” draws the logical conclusion from the chaff image.  Because the wicked are without substance, they will be unable to stand when judgment comes.  The judgment in view is both the final day of accountability and the ongoing reality that God continually evaluates every life.  To “stand” implies the ability to hold one’s ground, to be vindicated, to remain.  The wicked can’t do any of that.  Their lives will not hold up under scrutiny.

Neither will sinners stand “in the assembly of the righteous.”  There is a gathering of those who belong to God, a community marked by right relationship with Him.  The ungodly have no place there.  Their path has led them elsewhere.

Verse 6 supplies the ultimate reason for the contrast.  “The Lord watches over the way of the righteous.”  The verb speaks of intimate knowledge, protective care, and active involvement.  God isn’t distant from the path of those who delight in His Word; He is personally attentive to it.  Their way is under His supervision and care.

By contrast, “the way of the wicked” leads to destruction.  The way itself has a destination and that destination is ruin.  It’s not that God arbitrarily assigns destruction; the way itself, pursued to its end, arrives there.  What began with walking in step with the wicked, standing in the way of sinners, and sitting with mockers ends in the loss of everything that matters.

Here the psalm leaves us with two ways and two outcomes.  One way is marked by deliberate refusals and glad pursuits; it ends in rooted fruitfulness under the watchful care of the Lord. The other way is marked by progressive compromise and empty substance; it ends in inability to stand and final destruction.

Living this Psalm in Human Experience

Psalm 1 does not allow us to remain neutral observers of life or passive travelers. It presses the question of our own path. The refusals of verse 1 are still necessary. The influences that shape our thinking—media, friendships, cultural assumptions—must be examined. Have we grown comfortable walking in step with voices that ignore God? Have we paused too long in ways of thinking that Scripture calls sin? Have we taken a seat among those who treat the things of God lightly?

The pursuits of verse 2 remain the positive alternative. Delight in the law of the Lord does not happen automatically. It is cultivated by regular, thoughtful engagement with Scripture. Meditation day and night requires intentional space in a noisy world. The person who wants the stability of the planted tree must keep the roots in the water of the Word.

The rewards of verse 3 are still available. Fruitfulness in season, resilience under pressure, and a life that prospers under God’s purpose are not reserved for the spiritual elite. They belong to those who walk the path described.

And the warning of verses 4–6 still stands. The ungodly life is not merely less happy; it is ultimately worthless and insecure. No amount of present success can change the final evaluation of chaff. No clever argument can alter the destination of a path that leads to destruction.

Psalm 1 is therefore both invitation and warning drawn out of the raw material of human experience. Two paths lie before every person. One is the way of the righteous, watched over by the Lord. The other is the way of the wicked, which ends in ruin. The blessed life begins with a series of refusals, continues with a deep delight in God’s word, and results in a rooted, fruitful, enduring existence. That is the path the psalm sets before us. The only question left is which path we will walk.

Three Minutes With Mike

Three Minutes With Mike

The Fall of Israel – Halfway in is All the Way Out!

Click to listen to this teaching.

 

A QUICK AND EASY SURVEY OF HEBREW HISTORY

 The Fall of Israel

 2 Kings 17

 Introduction.  The northern kingdom of Israel had a long and troubled history after the division of the united monarchy.  From the moment Jeroboam son of Nebat led the ten tribes away from the House of David, idolatry and political instability were commonplace.  One king after another, we are told, did evil in the eyes of the Lord, and the prophetic warnings of Amos, Hosea, and many other prophets went largely unheeded.  By the time we get to 2 Kings 17, the end has come.  The fall of the capital of the northern kingdom, Samaria, happened in 722 BC and it wasn’t just a political or military disaster; it was the decisive judgment of God upon the people who had systematically rejected His covenant.

Hoshea – Israel’s last king.

Pressure from Assyria, 2 Kings 17:1 – 4.

In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, Hoshea son of Elah became king of Israel in Samaria, and he reigned nine years. [2] He did evil in the eyes of the Lord, but not like the kings of Israel who preceded him. [3] Shalmaneser king of Assyria came up to attack Hoshea, who had been Shalmaneser’s vassal and had paid him tribute. [4] But the king of Assyria discovered that Hoshea was a traitor, for he had sent envoys to So king of Egypt, and he no longer paid tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year. Therefore Shalmaneser seized him and put him in prison.  (2 Kings 17:1 – 4 | TNIV)

Hoshea, son of Elah, came to the throne in a kingdom already under the shadow of Assyria.  The northern kingdom had already been reduced to vassal status under previous rulers.  Tiglath-Pileser III had already carved significant territory and deported many Israelites.  Hoshea 9-year reign was the final chapter.

The text tells us that Hoshea “did evil in the eyes of the Lord, but not like the kings who preceded him.”  That’s pretty faint praise.  He was still an evil king, yet the historian seems to indicate that the open, state-sponsored excesses of earlier rulers such as King Ahab or the later kings of the Jehu dynasty were somewhat restrained.  Whatever the relative degree of wickedness, it made no difference in the end.  Judgment was already determined.

Assyria under Shalmaneser V (and later Sargon II) demanded regular tribute.  Hoshea had paid it for a time, but then he made a fatal political calculation.  He sent messengers to “So, the king of Egypt” (probably Osorkon IV) seeking an alliance that would free him from Assyrian domination.  The move was classic Near Eastern realpolitik:  Play one great power against another.  Well, it failed completely.  Egypt offered no effective help, and the Assyrian king discovered the conspiracy.  Hoshea was arrested and imprisoned.  The last king of Israel never returned to the throne.

This is a recurring pattern in Israel’s history.  Political maneuvering without repentance and trust in the Lord only hastens disaster.  Hoshea tried to secure the nation’s future through foreign alliances rather than through renewed covenant faithfulness.  The result was the opposite of what he intended.

The capital falls, 2 Kings 17:5, 6.

The king of Assyria invaded the entire land, marched against Samaria and laid siege to it for three years. [6] In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Assyria captured Samaria and deported the Israelites to Assyria. He settled them in Halah, in Gozan on the Habor River and in the towns of the Medes.  (2 Kings 17:5, 6 | TNIV)

With King Hoshea in prison, the Assyrian army moved against the capital itself.  Samaria, the fortified hill city founded by King Omri, withstood a three-year siege.  The duration of the siege testifies both to the strength of the city’s defenses and to the determination of the Assyrians.  In the end, the city fell.

The Assyrian policy of deportation was systematic and brutal.  Large numbers of the surviving population were carried away to various parts of the empire – Halah, Gozon on the Habor River, and the towns of the Medes.  The goal was clear:  Break the national identity of conquered peoples by scattering them and resettling foreign populations in their place.  The northern kingdom of Israel ceased to exist as a political entity.  The 10 tribes as a coherent people disappear from history.

The fall of Samaria marks the end of a 200-year experiment in independent northern monarchy.  What began with rebellion against the House of David ended in exile and national extinction.

Why Israel Fell.

The historian doesn’t leave the reasons for the catastrophe to speculation.  He provides a detailed theological diagnosis.

The catalogue of sins, 2 Kings 17:7 – 12.

Israel’s root problem is stated plainly:  They sinned against the Lord their God, the One who had redeemed them from Egypt.  The Exodus is deliberately recalled.  Israel’s identity and obligation rested on that act of deliverance.  To abandon their Redeemer for other gods was covenant treason of the highest order.

The catalogue painfully comprehensive:  They adopted the religious practices of the Canaanite nations the Lord had driven out of the land before them.  They also followed the innovations of their own kings – especially the golden calves of the Jeroboam and the Baal worship introduced under King Ahab.  High places multiplied all over Israel.  Sacred stones and Asherah poles sprang up on every hill and under every green tree.  Incense was burned to foreign deities.  The people en mass did “wicked things that aroused the Lord’s anger.”

Notice the language:

The Israelites secretly did things against the Lord their God that were not right.  (2 Kings 17:9 | NIV)

Idolatry often begins in private compromise and then becomes public and institutionalized.  What starts as a hidden practice ends as a national way of life.

This catalogue is not merely a list of religious offenses.  It is a description of a people who had lost the fear of the Lord.  The first commandment – “You shall have no other gods before me” – had been systematically violated for generations.  The land that was to be holy to the Lord had been filled with rival altars.

Swept away, 2 Kings 17:13 – 18.

God’s patience is obvious.  He didn’t bring sudden destruction without warning.  Through “all his prophets and seers” God called the people to turn from their evil ways and return to the Law.  The prophetic ministry of the 8th century BC – Amos, Hosea, Isaiah, Micah, and others – stands as evidence of God’s long-suffering nature.

Yet the response was always hardness of heart.  The people simply “would not listen.”  They were “stiff-necked.”  They rejected the covenant, the statutes, and the warnings.  The result is described with devastating clarity:  The people followed worthless idols and themselves became worthless.  Those who pursue emptiness become empty.

The list of specific sins intensifies:  The golden calves of Jeroboam, the Asherah pole, worship of the starry hosts, Baal, child sacrifice, divination, and the deliberate selling of themselves to do evil.  None of this was minor deviations from God’s expectations.  Each sin was part of a comprehensive rejection of everything the Lord had commanded.

The people angered the Lord and as a result, He cast them out of His presence.  The language used is covenant language.  He couldn’t look at them; the people who broke His covenant.  The land was the place of God’s special dwelling with His people.  To be thrust out of the land was to be thrust out of the sphere of covenant blessing.  Only Judah was left, and even Judah was already infected with the same practices.

The fall of Israel was not an accident of history or the inevitable result of Assyrian military superiority.  It was the result of the righteous judgment of a holy God upon a people who had exhausted His patience.

Israel’s ongoing idolatry.

The story doesn’t end with the deportation of the Israelites.  The land itself becomes the stage for a new chapter of religious confusion.

Learning to live in the land, 2 Kings 17:24 – 28.

Assyria’s policy of population transfer brought a mixed group of people into the former territory of Israel.  These newcomers didn’t know the Lord, obviously.  When the lions began to attack them, they interpreted the disaster in typical Near Eastern fashion:  The local deity was angry because they didn’t know to worship properly.

The Assyrian king’s solution was pragmatic.  He ordered that one of the captive Israelite priests be sent back to teach the new settlers what the local god requires of them.  A priest from the northern kingdom, trained in the corrupt, compromised religion of Bethel and Dan, returned to instruct the foreigners in the so-called “worship of Yahweh.”

The result was a syncretistic mixture from the very beginning.  The newcomers learned something of the Lord, but they never abandoned their own gods.  The land that had been given to Abraham’s descendants as a place of exclusive devotion to the one true God now became a religious marketplace.

Halfway in is all the way out, 2 Kings 17:29 – 34.

The final picture is sobering.  Each group brought its own deities and set them up in the high places that Israel had already polluted.  The list of foreign gods is given in detail:  Sukkoth, Benoth, Nergal, Ashima, Nibhaz, Tartak, Adrammelek, and Anammelek.  Worst of the all, child sacrifice continued unabated.

They key statement appears twice so the reader doesn’t miss its importance:  “They worshipped the Lord, but they also served their own gods.”  This is the essence of syncretism.  It’s not open atheism or pure paganism.  It’s the attempt to combine the worship of the true God with loyalty to other gods or powers.

The historian’s verdict is clear and final:

To this day they persist in their former practices. They neither worship the Lord nor adhere to the decrees and regulations, the laws and commands that the Lord gave the descendants of Jacob, whom he named Israel.  (2 Kings 17:34 | TNIV)

In other words, partial worship is no true worship.  Halfway in is all the way out.  The God of Israel will not share His glory with rivals.

This mixed population in the former northern kingdom became the Samaritans of later history.  Their religion was a hybrid that the Jews of Judah rightly regarded as compromised.  When the remnant returned to Jerusalem from their Babylonian exile, the tension between the true faith and this syncretistic faith would surface again and again.

Conclusion.  The fall of Israel stands as a permanent warning in the Biblical narrative.  Several powerful truths come to the surface that are worth noting.

First, God’s patience is real, but not infinite.  Generation after generation of prophets called the northern kingdom to repentance.  The people refused to listen.  There comes a point when the Lord simply removes a people from His presence.  That point arrived for Israel in 722 BC.

Second, idolatry is never just a religious preference.  It is covenant betrayal.  Whether the idols are golden calves, Baal, the stars, or the modern equivalents of power, pleasure, security, and self, the result is always the same:  Those who follow worthless things become worthless themselves.

Third, political solutions without spiritual repentance solve nothing.  Hoshea’s appeal to Egypt couldn’t save a nation under divine judgment.  Military strength and diplomatic cleverness are useless when the fundamental problem is sin against a holy God.

Fourth, syncretism is deadly.  The resettled people worshipped the one true God, but they also remained loyal to and served their own gods.  Many in every age attempt the same arrangement.  They want the comfort and respectability of biblical faith while retaining loyalty to other masters.  Scripture declares that such halfway posture is no worship at all.

Finally, the fall of the northern kingdom highlights the faithfulness of God to His Word.  He had warned through Moses that persistent disobedience would end in exile (Deuteronomy 28).  He had spoken through the prophets.  When judgment came, it was exactly what He said it would be.  The same God who judged Israel is the God who later restored a remnant from Judah and who, in the fullness of time, sent His Son to redeem a people from every nation.

The story of Israel’s fall is tragic, but it isn’t the end of the story.  The God who removed the northern tribes from His presence is also the God who, in Christ, brings near those who were afar off.  The call that went unheeded in Samaria still goes out today:  “Turn from your evil ways.  Observe my commands and decrees.”  Those who hear and obey find life.  Those who don’t will discover that the patience of God, though long, has an end.


Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 417,782 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 277 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket