Posts Tagged 'Acts'



STUDIES IN ACTS, PART 3

Understanding Tongues

When the Holy Spirit came to the infant Church in Acts 2, there were two signs that accompanied His arrival: the sound of a mighty, rushing wind and something that looked like tongues of fire. These were unique signs that have never been repeated in the history of the Church. You would be hard-pressed to find any Christian who would claim that these signs have been repeated.

Not so the third sign, speaking in other tongues. There are charismatic/pentecostal denominations that teach “speaking in other tongues” is a normative sign that an individual has received Spirit baptism. These denominations rightfully teach “speaking in other tongues” is the only supernatural sign from Acts 2 that is seen occurring multiple times in Acts. But they go one step further.  To them, this sign continues today.  When a believer experiences Spirit baptism, the proof or evidence that such a thing has taken place is that the newly-baptized person will start speaking in tongues immediately.

Other denominations claim that all signs associated with the very early Church ceased with the death of the last Apostle, probably John. They say correctly all miraculous signs that accompanied the spread of the Gospel in New Testament times were necessary to give authority to the preaching of the Gospel since the New Testament hadn’t been written yet. Today, our authority comes from the completed Word of God, hence “signs and wonders” are no longer needed. To these Churches, there is no “second blessing,” no Spirit baptism, for it is no longer needed, and a person is filled with the Spirit when they are born again and that’s it.

While no Christian denomination denies the Holy Spirit or His work in the Church and in individual believers, there seems to be two extremes in the Church today. On one side, there are denominations that pay little more than lip service to the Spirit. It’s like these “mainline” denominations really don’t know what to do with Him. On the other side, there are denominations that have created “pentecostal doctrines” in an effort to separate themselves from “those other churches” that they perceive as dead and powerless. Often, unfortunately these kinds of Churches go way overboard and their services are filled with all kinds of  strange “manifestations” of the Spirit’s presence.

Forgetting what “denominations” say, what does the Bible say?

1. Distinguishing between tongues in Acts and the Gifts of the Spirit

“Speaking in tongues as the Spirit enables” is wholly a New Testament doctrine. The very first instance is found in Acts 2.

All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them. (verse 4)

We know from verse 6 that these “tongues” were known languages—that is, known by people other than those speaking. This was truly a miracle! Just imagine if you opened your mouth and suddenly started speaking in a language you had never learned. This is what happened to the 120 when they were filled with the Holy Spirit. It wasn’t so much a “gift of tongues,” as it was a “gift of languages.” This ability to speak different languages was given to the 120, not to pray or praise God, but for the very practical purpose of evangelism. Remember, there may have been dozens and dozens of different languages represented in Jerusalem; they had come to town from far and wide for the Feast of Pentecost. So, the Lord providentially made it possible for the greatest number of people to hear the Gospel in one day by enabling the first church congregation to speak in different languages.

This “gift of languages” is seen other times in Acts, but it is never mentioned in any of the Epistles, although “speaking in tongues” is mentioned. In Acts, we read of two more incidents where “speaking in tongues” is mentioned:

Acts 10:45—47. Here, Jewish believers who were with Peter at Cornelius’ home were amazed when these new Gentile believers were filled with the Spirit and began to speak in other tongues. Again, the word translated “tongues” here means “known languages.”

While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message. The circumcised believers who had come with Peter were astonished that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on Gentiles. For they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God. (Acts 10:44—46)

“All who heard” the sermon Peter preached were filled with the Spirit. What is significant here is that these who heard the sermon were already believers, just as the 120 were. These Gentiles, also like the 120 Jews, were given the ability to speak in different languages. This was the first incursion of the Gospel into Gentile land, so, just like back in Jerusalem, God enabled the first Gentile evangelists to speak in languages necessary for spreading the Gospel in this new area.

Acts 19:6. This is the third and last instance of believers receiving the Holy Spirit in Acts and speaking in different languages as a result. This time, it was a group of brand new Christians in Ephesus Paul happened upon. What is interesting here is that this group of isolated Christians had never even heard of the Holy Spirit!

These Ephesians had previously repented and believed, but their knowledge was limited. They are still called “disciples,” and were God-fearing people who, when they learned more about Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit, gladly received the Spirit’s baptism. And, just like the 120 and the folks in Cornelius’ home, they were given the ability to speak different languages.

When Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they spoke in tongues and prophesied. (Acts 19:6)

Throughout Acts, it seems as though Spirit baptism is definitely an experience subsequent to salvation. In other words, based on the examples of Cornelius’ household and the Ephesian disciples, one may be a believer and not be “baptized in the Holy Spirit.” There are other examples that support the idea that Spirit baptism is a “second work of grace,” but only these three indicate that “speaking in tongues or “languages” followed the infilling of the Spirit.

Leaving Acts, the next reference to “speaking in tongues” is actually found in Romans, although that phrase is not used. Here is what Romans 8:26 says:

In the same way, the Spirit helps us in our weakness. We do not know what we ought to pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us through wordless groans.

This verse, coupled with what Paul would later write to the Corinthian church regarding “praying in the Spirit” is highly suggestive. These “wordless groans” occur when a believer is praying on his own, but at some point the Spirit comes on him, takes over, and prays through him. In this instance, the “groans” cannot be understood by any human being—they don’t constitute a known language, and it is not the Spirit praying for the person who is praying, it is the Spirit using the vocal abilities of the person praying. The idea of this verse is that as we pray, we may “run out of things to pray for,” and at that point the Spirit takes over, praying through us.  Another way to look at it is that when we come to the end of our resources, those of the Holy Spirit, who is within us, take over.

In Romans 12, Paul lists a series of spiritual gifts, including:

  • The ability to prophecy;
  • The ability to serve others;
  • The ability to teach;
  • The ability to encourage others;
  • The gift of giving generously;
  • The gift of leadership;
  • The gift of mercy.

In 1 Corinthians 12, Paul lists a few more spiritual gifts:

  • A message of wisdom;
  • A message of knowledge;
  • (Gift of) faith;
  • Gifts of healing;
  • The ability to work use miraculous powers;
  • The ability to prophecy;
  • The ability to discern between different kinds of spirits;
  • The ability to speak in tongues;
  • The ability to interpret tongues.

Elsewhere in the New Testament, there other Gifts of the Spirit mentioned, including these in Ephesians 4:

  • The gift of being an evangelist;
  • The gift of being a prophet;
  • The gift of apostleship;
  • The gift of the teacher/pastor.

With regards to Ephesians 4, it is clear that some of these gifts (offices in the church, really) have ceased to exist:

Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people and also members of his household, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone. (Ephesians 2:19, 20)

So we might say that the apostle and the prophet as offices in the Church were foundational ministries that we have built upon, and are no longer needed. This does not mean that the spiritual gift of prophecy does not exist, merely that there are no prophets or apostles in the church today (Christian cable channels notwithstanding).

So you see, then, that the spiritual gift of tongues is just one of many spiritual gifts. The Corinthian church of Paul’s day was obsessed with this one single gift to the exclusion of all the others, which is why he spent considerable time teaching them about the Gifts of the Spirit. It’s no different with the modern Church, where entire denominations have been founded on “the gift of tongues.” Why not found a denomination on the gift of encouragement? Or the gift of generosity? Why tongues? Paul teaches that all the Gifts of the Spirit are equal; none is better than another. Yet, the “gift of tongues” is the one that we hear most about, the one that is the most obvious to notice, and, as in the case of the Corinthian church, the one that is abused the most.

Chapter 13 of 1 Corinthians, the so-called “love chapter,” is really about how to use the Gifts of the Spirit in the best way: in love. Paul begins:

If I speak in the tongues (known languages) of men or of angels (gift of tongues–unknown languages), but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith (gift of faith) that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess (gift of generous giving) to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing. (verses 1—3)

When Christians engage in any abuse of any spiritual gift, they are not using that gift in love. The Gifts of the Spirit are given to Christians for the express purpose of building up the Church; they are to be used to bless the Body of Christ. Spiritual one-up-manship has no place in the Church because that takes the focus off Christ puts it on the one exercising his particular gift or gifts. This is probably why “the gift of tongues” is so abused and stressed so much; it’s hard to miss somebody in the congregation going off and babbling unintelligibly.

There is, then a clear distinction between the “tongues” of Acts and the “gift of tongues” elsewhere in the New Testament. In Acts, it was a the ability to speak foreign languages that fell on believers, so that they could engage in effective evangelism. This most remarkable ability accompanied an additional infilling of the Holy Spirit, because we know that a person is already filled with the Spirit when they initially believe.

In Paul’s teaching, we discover that there are numerous Gifts of the Spirit given to believers that enable them to engage in ministry to the Body of Christ beyond their normal talents. The “gift of tongues” is just one the many spiritual gifts believers may receive when they experience an additional infilling of the Spirit, subsequent to their initial infilling at conversion.

Also, since we haven’t heard of mass groups of English-speaking Christians breaking out in Mandarin Chinese after a prayer meeting, we can conclude that the “tongues,” the ability to speak foreign languages, of Acts 2 has gone the way of the Old Testament prophet and the New Testament apostle. It was a foundational ability that was needed only in the beginning but not now.

2. The gift of tongues

So is “speaking in tongues” a “normative sign” that a believer has been baptized in the Holy Spirit? Not according to the “tongues” of Acts. Those “tongues” were foreign languages, not “the language of the Spirit.” Since all the Gifts of the Spirit are equal, then we must conclude that the “normative sign” that one has had a deeper experience with the Holy Spirit—if indeed a sign accompanies that—must be the manifestation of any of the Gifts of the Spirit, including but not limited to tongues. What, then, is this “gift of tongues,” outside of Acts, all about?

The answer to that question is found is not in denominational literature, but the Word of God, specifically 1 Corinthians 14. This chapter was written to a large but troubled church. It was full of members who were full of the Holy Spirit, but desperately in need of learning how to use those gifts properly. After listing “the gift of tongues” along with all the other Gifts of the Spirit in chapter 12, Paul, in chapter 13, first teaches the Corinthians that they must exercise all the gifts (he uses only the gifts of tongues, prophecy, faith, and giving as examples) in love. You may think it odd that Christians would have to be told that, but the admonition to love one another was given numerous time by Jesus and John. The implication is that Christians may find it difficult to love one another. Given the destructive behavior many pastors see in their congregations, it becomes obvious that even genuine believers, from time to time, will engage in behavior that brings harm to a brother or sister, and what better way to do that than using their spiritual gift to make them feel inferior? For that reason, Paul warns his Corinthian friends that no one gift is superior to another, that all are needed in the Church, and Spiritual gifts should be used in love.

That brings us to 1 Corinthians 14. Here is what Paul teaches about the spiritual gift of “tongues” in that chapter:

  • For anyone who speaks in a tongue does not speak to people but to God. Indeed, no one understands them; they utter mysteries by the Spirit. (verse 2) This reminds us of what Paul wrote to the Romans; of how the Holy Spirit prays through us with groanings that cannot be understood by human beings. In the context of 1 Corinthians 14, Paul basically admonishes the people with that gift to pray in tongues away from other people because when they speak in tongues it does nothing for anybody else—that is, praying in tongues for all to hear is not a loving way to exercise that gift. Why? Because it is useless to the one who hears and it draws his attention to the one speaking in tongues.
  • Now, brothers and sisters, if I come to you and speak in tongues, what good will I be to you, unless I bring you some revelation or knowledge or prophecy or word of instruction? (verse 6) Paul in verse 18, Paul will tell his friends that he speaks in tongues often; but here he says that if he comes simply speaking to them in tongues, like during a sermon or during a worship service for example, then he’s wasting his time. They can’t understand him, so he then says it’s better to use another gift or speak the Word of God in a language all can understand. The words “some revelation” could refer to a teaching one gives during a sermon or Bible lesson. “Knowledge” and “prophecy” more than likely refer to those particular spiritual gifts.
  • So it is with you. Since you are eager for gifts of the Spirit, try to excel in those that build up the church. For this reason the one who speaks in a tongue should pray that they may interpret what they say. (verses 12, 13) Notice what Paul says here and what he does not say. The Corinthians were excited about using their spiritual gifts, but Paul wanted them to become expert at using the ones that built up the greatest number of people in the Church. He obviously can’t be referring to tongues, because he just taught them that tongues are of no benefit to anybody in the church save the one speaking in them. Verse 13 is like a caveat, it does not provide a new use for tongues. Should a person get carried away and break out in tongues during a service, the genie is out of the bottle. What is to be done? Scores of people have heard something they shouldn’t have heard and they have no idea what was said. In that case, Paul suggested the best course of action would be for that person to correct his mistake by asking God to give him the interpretation of what he had just prayed to God so that everybody who heard him could be blessed just as he himself had been blessed. Paul is not encouraging the public display of tongues, he is simply giving advice in case it happened.

Here is way the gift of tongues should never be used during a worship service:

Tongues, then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers; prophecy, however, is not for unbelievers but for believers. So if the whole church comes together and everyone speaks in tongues, and inquirers or unbelievers come in, will they not say that you are out of your mind? But if an unbeliever or an inquirer comes in while everyone is prophesying, they are convicted of sin and are brought under judgment by all, as the secrets of their hearts are laid bare. So they will fall down and worship God, exclaiming, “God is really among you!” (verses 22—25)

Breaking that down, we notice:

  • The gift of tongues exercised in public does nothing for other Christians, but will most certainly confuse an unbeliever who hears it and will make the one speaking in tongues look like they are out of their mind. So, there is no way to use the gift of tongues in public in a way that is helpful to anybody, saint or sinner. Why? Because the spiritual gift of tongues is only good for the one exercising it.
  • But if another gift of the Spirit is being exercised, like the gift of prophecy, which is exercised in a known language, then that same sinner, instead of being confused, will actually be convicted of sin in their life and realize that God is among the congregation.

The key for Paul is that when Christians get together, they need to have an orderly service. Remember, the Corinthians were excited about using their spiritual gifts, so they needed verses 26—40 in the worst way. Most churches today have the opposite problem; they are devoid of any manifestations of the Spirit, good or bad. Given that, these verses sound like Paul is giving guidelines for how to have a pentecostal church service: two or three people should speak in tongues, somebody should interpret, anybody with the gift of prophecy should stand up and give their message, but again only two or three of them, and so on. But, instead of looking at these verses as patterns for pentecostal services, what if we look at them as “what to do if things get out of hand”? If Spirit-filled believers get carried away and start exercising their gifts improperly, the leader of the service shouldn’t shut it down, compounding an already uncomfortable situation, he should calmly take control of the service and reign in those who are carried away in their Spiritual gifts.

Therefore, my brothers and sisters, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues. But everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way. (verses 39, 40)

We never want to “quench the Spirit,” but people need to be taught how to use their particular gift or gifts in the right way so as to minister to the most number of believers in the most effective, God-glorifying way.

Summary

Based on the preponderance of Biblical evidence, there is an encounter with the Holy Spirit Christians may look forward to that is subsequent to their initial encounter with Him at their conversion. This second encounter, often referred to as “the Baptism in the Holy Spirit,” is a second infilling of the Spirit, at which time a believer is given the ability to exercise certain gifts given him by the Spirit. All but one of these gifts are for the encouragement of the Body of Christ. The gift of tongues is a spiritual gift given to a believer for his benefit only, so that he may pray in the Spirit, or so that the Spirit may pray through him.

The “gift of tongues” as one of the Gifts of the Spirit is not to be confused with “speaking in tongues” that we see in the book of Acts. There, the “tongues” represented known languages and were for the benefit of those who heard the Gospel in their own language.

To conclude this study, let me quote the great Apostle:

Now eagerly desire the greater gifts. (1 Corinthians 12:31a)

Our churches today are just as desperate as the Corinthian church was, except our desperation is for more of the Holy Spirit.  Perhaps when we get to the end of our resources and realize we need something (Someone) more, then we will be visited by Him in a dynamic way.

(c)  2011 WitzEnd

STUDIES IN ACTS, Part 2

 

Pentecost and the Coming of the Holy Spirit, Luke 2

The Book of Acts is definitely a book of history, but it is a book of history with a difference: there are no dates in it. It is left up to scholars to fill in the chronological blanks. The consensus among Bible scholars and historians is that the events recorded in Acts 2 occurred during the Jewish feast of Pentecost celebrated during the last week of May, in the year 30 AD.

The word “pentecost” comes from a Greek word meaning “fiftieth.” As part of their Feast of Weeks, the Jews celebrated Pentecost on the fiftieth day after Passover. It is also known as the Feast of Harvest, at which the celebrants presented the firstfruits of the wheat harvest.

While Christians have appropriated the word “pentecost” and associate it with the work of the Holy Spirit in the church, that is not the correct use of the word. Pentecost was a Jewish feast, it was part of the the Jewish calendar and has no real meaning outside of that context. The Holy Spirit was given on the Day of Pentecost, not because Spirit baptism is a “Pentecostal Blessing,” but because that particular day was the one day when Jerusalem was literally overflowing with visitors attending the day’s festivities. It was the perfect day for the Spirit to descend, fill the followers of Christ, empowering them to witness to the greatest number of people at one time. All these visitors who heard the Gospel would take the Gospel back home with them when the Feast of Weeks was over.

The Baptism of the Holy Spirit was eluded to in Matthew’s and Luke’s Gospels, where it was carefully distinguished from John’s baptism:

John answered them all, “I baptize you with water. But one who is more powerful than I will come, the thongs of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.” (Luke 3:16)

Luke is the only Gospel writer who connects what John the Baptist said with the miracle at Pentecost.

The coming of the Holy Spirit was the final phase of Christ’s mission. First came the Incarnation; when God became man to secure our redemption; to unite man with His Creator. Then came then the Crucifixion, the sacrificial, substitutionary death of Jesus Christ, during which He gave His life as a ransom for sinful man; separating those sins from those He came to save. Next, the Resurrection—the literal, physical resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. Finally, Pentecost and the coming (or giving) of the Holy Spirit to the Church.

1. All together in one room, Acts 2:1

When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place.

When the Church began, you could squeeze it all into one room. There were some 120 souls waiting patiently for something to happen. Luke gives us a hint as to when the event happened: “when the day of Pentecost came,” which simply means that the Holy Spirit came some time during this particular Day of Pentecost. While Luke gives us some practical information, he is also giving us a statement of great theological import. By mentioning “the Day of Pentecost,” Luke is reaching back in time to embrace the many Old Testament prophecies surrounding the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, like Joel 2:28. Not only prophecies, there were many “foreshadowings” of this great day. In Leviticus 23, we are given all the details of the Jewish feasts and festivals, including Passover. Passover was celebrated in the spring of the year, and this foreshadowed the death of Jesus Christ. He and the disciples celebrated Passover on the evening before His death—the death of the perfect Lamb of God.

Get rid of the old yeast, so that you may be a new unleavened batch—as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old bread leavened with malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. (1 Corinthians 5:7—8)

After Passover, they were to bring their firstfruits—a sheaf of grain as an offering. In 1 Corinthians 15:20, Paul reckoned that the resurrection of Jesus from the dead was a kind of firstfruit of the resurrection of all believers to come.

As part of the Feast of Pentecost, we read this in Leviticus 23:17—

From wherever you live, bring two loaves made of two-tenths of an ephah of the finest flour, baked with yeast, as a wave offering of firstfruits to the LORD.

The two loaves of bread could not represent Jesus Christ because of the presence of yeast, which represents sin. So what then does the bread represent? This wave offering in Leviticus represents all those who, through the atoning work of Jesus Christ, are presented to God, though not perfect, but still redeemed by Christ.

These imperfect believers were “all together in one place.” This phrase suggests that the 120 were not only in the same place at the same time for the same purpose, but they were in unity. However, this unity was not why the Spirit came, as some like to suggest. In fact, the Holy Spirit’s coming to the Church was an event preordained by God. It was an event determined by God in eternity past; God did not give His Spirit because the 120 were manifesting any kind of unity.

The interesting thing about this “unity” is that the 120 were all expecting something to happen; they were gathered together as they had been instructed by the risen Lord, all with a spirit of expectation.

2. The Age of the Spirit, verses 2—4

Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.

Because the Holy spirit is just that, a Spirit, there is nothing sensory about Him. However, for the sake of the 120, along with the coming of the Holy Spirit, God manifested certain visible and audible signs so there could be no mistake that what happened to the faithful that day was what they were expecting.

Wind. The first thing we notice about the coming of the Holy spirit is the suddenness of His appearance. The believers expected something to happen, but when it happened, it was quick, and it was sudden and surprising. Why wind? The Lord in His providence and wisdom manifested the Spirit’s presence using a very familiar thing. Jesus taught this in John 3:8—

The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.

Fire. This sign was in fulfilment of what John the Baptist said in Matthew 3:11—

I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me comes one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.

Of course, what looked like fire really wasn’t fire; it was the visible manifestation of the Holy Spirit. The “tongues of fire” were not so different from what appeared to be dove, descending upon Jesus when He was baptized in the Jordan River.

What was the significance of this display of sound and light? of wind and fire? There is a distinct parallel between the giving of the Holy Spirit and the giving of the Law at Mount Sinai. Consider the similarities:

On the morning of the third day there was thunder and lightning, with a thick cloud over the mountain, and a very loud trumpet blast. Everyone in the camp trembled. Then Moses led the people out of the camp to meet with God, and they stood at the foot of the mountain. Mount Sinai was covered with smoke, because the LORD descended on it in fire. The smoke billowed up from it like smoke from a furnace, and the whole mountain trembled violently. (Exodus 19:16—19)

The giving of the Law ushered in a brand new epoch and the Israelites needed to see and hear and experience it in all its fullness. The manifestation of God’s presence on Mount Sinai was unnecessary, but God knew the people needed to be fully alert and conscious of the significance of what was happening. So it was at Pentecost with the Holy Spirit. The era of the Holy Spirit had arrived; the disciples needed to experience God’s presence and His authority in a manner they would never forget.

Tongues. Immediately, the whole group was filled with the Holy Spirit. The Greek text indicates that the entire group, all 120, were filled once, all at the same time. In other words, the Spirit came and stayed with each of the 120; He did not come and go, come and go, as He did in the Old Testament. The outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the 120 happened one time; they were not baptized in the Spirit over and over. Henceforth, He abides in the Body of Christ, the Church, both corporately and individually. When a sinner confesses Christ as His Savior, he is filled with the Holy Spirit; Jesus Christ comes in and abides in that new believer in the Person of the Holy Spirit. That new believer at the moment of his conversion is not only filled with the Holy Spirit, but he becomes part of the Body of Christ—the Church (that is, the invisible Church). At some point, he will become part of the visible Church, a local body of believers.

When the Spirit filled all those believers, they literally became the “mouthpieces of the Spirit.” At Pentecost, the curse of Babel was lifted. the effect of the Spirit literally reversed what happened in Genesis 11—

Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.” So the LORD scattered them from there over all the earth, and they stopped building the city. That is why it was called Babel—because there the LORD confused the language of the whole world. From there the LORD scattered them over the face of the whole earth. (Genesis 11:7—9)

At Pentecost, the Holy Spirit came and miraculously enabled the Christians to speak in languages all visitors to Jerusalem could understand. In fact, the word “tongue” here means “spoken language.” These “tongues” were not an “unknown language,” but known languages, as Dr. Luke makes clear in verse 6:

When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard their own language being spoken.

No matter how much some people want to equate the “tongues” here in Acts 2 with the “tongues” Paul writes about in 1 Corinthians 14, there is no correlation; they are not the same “tongues.” The purpose of “tongues” here was for a more effective witness in and around Jerusalem. Only God knew how many different languages were represented by the many visitors to Jerusalem during this particular Pentecost. By empowering the believers with the ability to speak in different languages, God was enabling all these visitors to Jerusalem to hear the Gospel in a language they could understand.

There are those who wonder if the miracle was in the speaking or in the hearing. The miracle of “tongues” had to be in the speaking of different language because the Spirit filled the 120, no the crowd who heard them.

3. Final thoughts

The coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost is the most significant event in the history of the Church. It is significant theologically and practically. We might say the Spirit came for these two purposes. First, theologically, the Holy Spirit took all those believers and baptized them into ONE Body of believers. The Church existed before the Spirit fell, but it was at best a very loose group with little or no organization. The Church before Pentecost was just a bunch of people who loved Jesus. But when the Spirit came, that bunch of loose knit people were knit together as one; baptized into the Body of Christ. The Holy Spirit took that disparate group of men and women and them one.

Second, practically, the Holy Spirit empowered those believers to spread the Gospel. The Spirit came to take the teachings of Jesus and of the Word of God and make them real to the believers, giving them the supernatural unction to proclaim those things to others with confidence in a way they could understand.

After the Spirit fell at Jerusalem, the empowered Church of Jesus Christ began to grow and multiply. When it reached the Samaritans, they received the Holy spirit. When it reached the Gentiles, they received the Holy Spirit. Wherever the Gospel was preached and received by those who heard it, the Spirit filled those new believers immediately.

(c)  2011 WitzEnd

STUDIES IN ACTS, Part 1

Introductory Matters

The New Testament book of Acts is the link between the Gospels and the Epistles. Without it, we would not know how the Church grew, where all the Christians and churches came from, and, in fact, we would have an incomplete picture of Jesus Christ. Left only with the image of our Lord painted in the Gospels, we have a Savior who lived humbly, taught things never taught before, and provided salvation for all who would believe in Him. But Jesus’ mission did not end with His resurrection and ascension. He came not only to save but also to establish a “called out” group of people called the Church, and the book of Acts deals with that part of His mission. Knowing what is written in Acts is absolutely essential if you want to understand any of the Epistles.

In length, the book of Acts is almost the longest book in the New Testament, made up of 28 chapters and over 1,000 verses. Yet, the name of the book is a misnomer. It was added to the text in the second century, but “the Acts of the Apostles” is not at all what the book is about! It’s really about “the Acts of the Holy Spirit in the Church.”

But Acts is much more than just history, although there is plenty of history in it. Acts give us a tremendous principle that has been largely forgotten or ignored in the 21st century. The principle in Acts was really first mentioned in the Old Testament:

See that you make them according to the pattern shown you on the mountain. (Exodus 25:40)

It was vital that Moses follow God’s instructions to the letter in building the Tabernacle if he was to have success in leading the Hebrews. In the book of Acts, God has given us a pattern for building the Church, for Christian evangelism, and missionary effort. One of the many reasons why the Church of Jesus Christ seems to be struggling so much today is because we have strayed from God’s way of building it. If we could get back to God’s pattern of Church building as revealed in Acts, how much greater would our efforts be blessed by Him?

1. Division and peculiarity

The book of Acts, written by Luke, is easy to divide up for study, and there are many excellent ways to divide up Acts. Here is one the most workable:

  • Chapters 1—12: the work of Peter
  • Chapters 13—28: the work of Paul

Of course, within these major divisions, there are major subdivisions, which we will look at in depth as we work our way through Acts.

A very peculiar feature of Acts is that there is no end; there is no conclusion to the book. It ends abruptly with the apostle Paul living in a rented house in Rome. This has led some to speculate that part of Acts is missing or that Luke intended to write more but for some reason didn’t. These speculations may have merit; but the fact is, the Acts of the Holy Spirit in the Church never really end; the work of the Holy Spirit through the Church continues to this day. And while Luke may or may not be recording what the Church is doing today, we know we are being watched closely:

Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles. And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us. (Hebrews 12:1)

2. Special features of Acts

Dr. McGee lists seven special features of the book of Acts. Here they are in summary form:

(1) Prominence of the Lord Jesus Christ. This sounds funny, since He had left the scene at the very beginning of Acts, taken up to heaven in His ascension, so He is no longer in the picture. However, just because we can’t see Him, doesn’t mean He isn’t working! Jesus Christ may not be physically on the earth right now, but He is the Sovereign Lord over all at the right hand of God, but still living in and working through His Church and His ambassadors on earth.

(2) Prominence of the Holy Spirit. This is how Jesus is working on earth today; in the Person and Power of the Holy Spirit. The promise that He would send the Holy Spirit was given by Jesus four times in the Gospel of John (see 1:33; 7:37—39; 14:16—17; 20:22). The promise was given one more time at the beginning of Acts and the Holy Spirit finally came in Acts 3. The Church of Jesus Christ is living in the age of the Holy Spirit today, as He indwells all believers.

(3) Power of the Church. The Church of Jesus Christ may look powerless, but when it does what God intends for it to do, there is no stopping it! However, you can’t help but notice that the Church in Acts seemed so much more powerful than the Church today. There is a good reason for this: the very early Church operated on a “spiritual high” that has never been repeated. Still, as each believer yields his life to the Holy Spirit within him, he will be a spiritual force to be reckoned with.

(4) Prominence of the Church. In Acts, as opposed to the Gospels, the Church is visible and active. It is seen growing in spite of (or maybe because of) persecution.

(5) Prominence of places. Reading Acts is sort of like leafing through a travelogue. It begins in Jerusalem and ends in Rome, but in between we are introduced to all kinds of towns, cities, islands, provinces, regions, and countries. It’s significant that archeology has found all the places Luke wrote about to have been real places at one time, even though many have long since disappeared.

(6) Prominence of people. Luke writes about an amazing 110 people in Acts! We know all about Peter and Paul, but 108 other believers are mentioned by name throughout Acts. This was Luke’s way to showing how large the Church had become in such a short span of time. By the time Acts ends, there could have been millions of Christians scattered across Asia and Europe.

(7) Prominence of the Resurrection. When you read the sermons that were recorded for us by Luke—sermons preached by Peter and Paul—we see that the Resurrection of Jesus was the center point of those sermons. We don’t hear a lot about Jesus’ Resurrection these days, unless it’s Easter. But in the early Church, the Resurrection was the focal point of all preaching because the Resurrection was the reason for the Church’s existence.

(8) Prominence of Peter and Paul. Were there other great preachers in the early Church? Of course there were! There is no way the Church grew at such a pace with just the preaching of Peter and Paul! Why are there no records of their work? This is a question we will have to ask the Lord when we see Him. Peter, Paul, and Luke were friends and associates in the great work of the Gospel, so it makes sense that Luke would write mostly about them.  There were many other preachers of distinction in the early Church, but we will have to wait for Heaven to learn about their contribution to the growth of the Body of Christ in the book of Acts.

FORCEFULLY ADVANCING: The Church in Acts, Part 7

Dark-Shipwreck-1-1024x768
MINSITERING WHEN YOU’D RATHER NOT
(AND WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DO)

Acts 27, 28

After having been tried before Festus and Agrippa, it was agreed that there was no reason Paul should have been in chains, and that Paul could have been set free after such a positive verdict had he not appealed to Caesar—

Agrippa said to Festus, “This man could have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar.”  (Acts 26:32)

All the issues surrounding Paul’s imprisonment were now settled, and finally he would be sent to Rome, exactly as he wanted.  For years, the apostle had his heart set on reaching Rome to visit the Christians there and to preach there.  It was natural that Paul should want to minister in Rome for it was the hub of the civilized world at that time.  It was the capital of the mighty Roman Empire and there was a strong body of believers in that city despite the fact that up till now, Rome had not been evangelized by any apostle!  How this apostle longed to go to Rome, and he prayed to that end.  Finally, after all these years, Paul’s prayers were answered, but in a very strange and unexpected way.

Paul’s experience is probably very common among believers of every generation.  The Lord may place a particular burden on your heart to go to a certain place or witness to a particular person or be involved in some sort of ministry, and you may even envision yourself engaged in that work, and praying to that end.  But the way God moves you into that service or the doors you have to go through to get to the point where you are able to serve God in that way may be completely unexpected.  Maybe the work or service you thought would be so easy to perform turned out to be extremely difficult or frustrating.  Yet through the grace of God, you work and you endure and you see the results.  All who serve the Lord according to His will are able to do so joyfully, effectively, and persistently despite the circumstances.  This was something Paul understood.

1.  Adverse circumstances, 27:1, 13—26; 40—44

Generally speaking, Jews did not like the water; they looked at the sea with great apprehension and suspicion and with the exception of fishermen, they generally avoided going on the open water.   When the John wrote about “the new heaven and the new earth,” he also includes this—

…the sea will be no more…(Revelation 21:1)

This would have been a great comfort to John; no more sea to be afraid of!

For Paul, though, sailing was the only way to travel the distances God intended him to travel.  He did not like to sail, and in fact 2 Corinthians 11:25 gives us an idea why Paul disliked sailing so much—

Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, I spent a night and a day in the open sea…

Now Paul has to go to sea again, this time as a prisoner.  He was bound for Rome, finally, with his good friend Luke at his side.

(a)  Support for Paul, verses 1, 2

Luke had been with Paul all during his two-year imprisonment, and now he will be the apostle’s companion en route to Rome.  We may wonder what Luke did while Paul was cooling his heels in prison; likely he was gathering information for his Gospel.  Perhaps it was during this time that he was able to sit down and interview Mary, the now-aged mother of Jesus, who would have been the only one who could have given Luke some of the background material found in the first two chapters of his Gospel.

We may also wonder how Luke was able to sail on this ship; he was no prisoner.  In all probability, he had to pay his own way.  This was not uncommon; friends of prisoners would be the ones responsible to furnish the prisoner’s food, clothing and other necessities

Another thing of interest is this:  Paul was not the only prisoner on board this ship.  There were  many other Roman prisoners being sent to Rome.  Unlike Paul, who was heading to Rome for an interview with Caesar, these prisoners were probably all heading to Rome for execution.  Some of them would likely end up as gladiators, meeting their end fighting wild beasts.  What a golden opportunity to share the Gospel of hope with men who had no hope!

In verse two, we see that not only did Luke accompany Paul, a man named Aristarchus also went with them.  He was, apparently, one of Paul’s closest and most faithful friends and was with Paul constantly during the apostle’s first imprisonment at Rome (Colossians 4:10; Philemon v. 24).  How did Paul, a prisoner, manage to have two friends with him?   As a Roman citizen who had appealed to the Emperor, Paul would have been treated with more respect than the other prisoners, and the centurion would have recognized immediately that Paul was no criminal; he was a gentleman who deserved to have his attendants traveling with him.  It has also been suggested that Luke accompanied Paul, not just as a friend or attendant, but as his personal physician, as he seems later to have done in Paul’s final stay in prison (see 2 Timothy 4:11).

(b)  Peril at sea, 27:13—20

Paul had previously warned the men to stay safely in port because of the extreme dangers storms posed this time of the year—

“Men, I can see that our voyage is going to be disastrous and bring great loss to ship and cargo, and to our own lives also.”

Paul may have been afraid of the sea, but he was no dummy!  However, apparently time was of the essence, so on a nice day, the crew decided to press on.  It wasn’t long, however, before Paul’s worries were realized, thanks to something Luke calls Euroclydon in the KJV—

But not long after there arose against it a tempestuous wind, called Euroclydon.

The NIV calls this Euroclydon a “northeaster,” but the term Luke used was a common nautical term of his day for a violent wind that blew into the Mediterranean from out of Europe.  This was the winter season, and these Euroclydon storms were, apparently, common.  Verse 15 vividly describes the fury of this hurricane—

The ship was caught by the storm and could not head into the wind; so we gave way to it and were driven along.

For an unbelievable two weeks, the storm pounded the ship.  The crew did everything they could to keep the ship and its crew and passengers safe.   In the darkness, being tossed all over the map, the crew lost their direction and their hope.  It seemed all was lost.

(c)  A word of encouragement, 27:21—26

Luke had just spent a number of verses breathlessly describing the storm in vivid detail.  These must rank among the most exciting verses in all of Scripture!  Yet, for all his detail, one thing is curiously missing:  what was Paul doing all this time?  To be sure, he must have been scared, perhaps even pessimistic—

When neither sun nor stars appeared for many days and the storm continued raging, we finally gave up all hope of being saved.  (verse 20; note the inclusive “we,” including Paul)

A visit by an angel gave Paul enough courage for an “I told you so” moment.  He did warn everybody about the weather, and was proved right.  Paul, always ready to give a word of advice, gives them one more, which they will actually follow this time—

“Nevertheless, we must run aground on some island.”  (verse 26)

What is particularly interesting to me is that in the midst of this violent storm, surrounded by pagan, godless, hardened prisoners and men of the sea, Paul was able to stand—no small feat during a storm—and speak freely about God and a heavenly visitation.  Within Paul’s encouraging “I told you so” sermon, is a slice of God’s grace:  not one life would be lost.

This was, incidentally, a second visit Paul had from this very same angel.  Previously, this angel had told Paul that he would some day bear witness for God in Rome, and now he returns to remind and reassure Paul that the promise would be kept in spite of the circumstances.    When God makes a promise, He will keep it.  Believers should never lose faith or think that God has forgotten them on the basis of circumstances.

These dire circumstances were part of the plan; a part that Paul could never have imagined.  Had it not been for the two-year imprisonment in Caesarea, the plot for Paul’s death hatched by malicious Jews, the decision of girly-man Festus, the trial in front of Agrippa and Bernice, the stubborn refusal to listen to Paul’s advice, all got Paul to this very moment where he was able to witness and preach to an audience that had no choice but to listen.  Never doubt God or judge Him by the circumstances you may find yourself in.

(d)  Safe at last, 27:40—44

With a flurry of nautical details, Luke describes the beaching of the ship.  The ship began to break apart, and it was every man for himself!  Roman law dictated that if a soldier or guard allowed his prisoner to escape, that guard’s life was forfeit; he would have to suffer the same fate intended for his prisoner.  This is why the soldiers wanted to kill all the prisoners; it was their lives or the lives of prisoners.  But God rules and overrules, during storms and even in the heart of a Roman centurion named Julius, who was determined to protect Paul.  He ordered the soldiers to stop killing the prisoners immediately.  He ordered all on board the ship to get to dry land however it was possible for them.  They were headed to an island, after all;  where else could they go?

In the next chapter, Julius is seen as being almost friendly toward Paul.  It is never stated that Julius became a believer, but given all that happened to him and how he treated Paul, it is likely.

2.  Miraculous ministry, 28:1—10

(a)  Hospitality, vs. 1, 2

Malta was, and still is, a small island, about 18 miles long and 8 miles wide.  Originally settled and colonized about 1,000 B.C. by the Phoenicians, it was known to them and to other ancient sea-faring peoples as “a place of refuge,” which “malta” or “melita” means.

By the time of the shipwreck, Malta was owned by Rome, however, so when the locals saw soldiers and prisoners clambering ashore, proper respect was shown despite the fact that these locals were considered to be “barbarians”—

The islanders showed us unusual kindness. They built a fire and welcomed us all because it was raining and cold.

You never know where kindness will come from!  These “barbarians” treated Paul better than he was ever treated in Jerusalem!

(b)  Protection, vs. 3—6

Paul, a hard worker no matter where he was or what he found himself doing, gathered some firewood, and when he laid it on the fire a most remarkable thing happened—

…a viper, driven out by the heat, fastened itself on his hand.  (verse 3b)

To the pagan and superstitious islanders, it was clear that Paul was not a good man:  he survived a shipwreck but will be killed by a snake.  To them, this was a kind of “godless justice.”  We may chuckle at the way they thought, but many of us are guilty of passing judgment on someone based on things we may see and not understand.

Instead of dropping dead, Paul merely shook the beast off and carried on, much to the surprise of the onlookers!  This greatly impressed the simple folk, who viewed Paul now, not as a criminal, but as a “god.”

(c)  Healings, vs. 7—10

In all, Paul spent three months, the worst months of the winter, on Malta.  Luke only gives us a couple of incidents that occurred during this time, and this one is quite instructive.  No matter what the circumstances, a true servant of God is always on duty, ready to serve.

Publius was the governor of the island, and as an official act of courtesy, he had the survivors over to his estate for dinner, which lasted three days.  They knew how to throw a party, these Maltese.  Given the fact that there were 276 survivors, it is likely that only the soldiers, Paul and his friends were among the invited guests.

The kindness of the islanders in general and of Publius in particular, is returned by Paul and his friends.  The father of Publius was bedridden and sick with dysentery.  In fact, this sickness is now known as Malta Fever, and is caused by the milk of Maltese goats.  At any rate, all this was unknown in Paul’s day, and apparently Publius’ father wasn’t the only one with Malta Fever.

Paul healed the father by simply laying his hands on the man and praying.  As a result of this healing, an amazing thing happened—

When this had happened, the rest of the sick on the island came and were cured.  (verse 9)

There is a change in words here.  When the old man was healed, Luke indicates that he was “healed,” his condition changed.  When the rest of the sick islanders came, there were also healed but Luke used a different word: therapeuo.  This word is the basis for our word “therapy.”

It has been noted by many scholars that while Paul obviously had the gift of healing and frequently exercised it, he seemed unable to heal himself, living with his “thorn in the flesh” for his lifetime.  Barclay makes an astute and thoughtful observation about Paul’s healing ministry—

Beethoven, for instance, gave to the world immortal music, which he himself, being stone deaf, never heard.

In response to these many miracles, the islanders honored Paul and his friends in many ways, that probably included gifts of money and other things people involved in a shipwreck might be in need of.  Once again, the nearly 300 survivors were indebted to Paul; he not only gave them the advice that saved their lives, but because of his ministry, their stay on Malta was a very pleasant one.  God’s blessings overflow and touch many lives if we, like Paul, are faithful to Him.

Paul was no god, but he was a faithful messenger of God and nothing seemed to stop him in delivering his message.  All Paul wanted to do was to get to Rome, yet time and again circumstances seemed to conspire against the apostle’s plans.   Even though he was unable to preach in Rome, the message that was burning to get out did; to all who were around Paul in his misadventures.

Malta was not on Paul’s itinerary, but from Luke’s account, it seems that Paul may have considered his sabbatical there as a sort of high point in his ministry.  It was certainly a time of blessing for the Maltese when God used Paul and worked through him in amazing ways.  Despite the less-than-ideal circumstances surrouning his arrival on Malta, God ministered to Paul, as well.  After two very long and bleak years in a prison at Caesarea, Paul enjoyed a mild and quiet winter on an island in relative freedom, which no dobut prepared him for his mission to Rome, which was yet to come.

God moves in strange ways in our lives, too.  If we get too busy with the details of everyday living, and if we obsess on the way things are instead of the way we want them to be, we might miss out on the kind of blessings God had for Paul.   Let’s be faithful to God, let’s be faithful in our service to Him despite the circumstances.  And let’s not allow circumstances—good or bad—to dictate our opinions of God.

(c)  2009 WitzEnd

Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 419,117 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 277 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket