Posts Tagged 'New Testament'



Practically Speaking: James 7

Previously, James discussed the absolute folly of thinking one could be religious while the tongue is uncontrolled:

My dear brothers, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry.  (1:19)

In this section of his letter, he picks us this theme and enlarges upon it.  This is a natural progression, for in the last chapter,  James exposed the absurdity of a “faith” that expresses itself only in words and not in deeds.  Those most tempted to behave like that; practice a dead and lifeless faith, are teachers.   Lenski in his comments on this passage helps us to put it into proper perspective:

We should think of the early churches in which any member might speak out in the meetings.  1 Corinthians 14:26-34 is instructive:  any brother might contribute some word; yet Paul lays down restrictions:  it must be for the purpose of edifying only, must occur in due order, two or three only are to s peak, and the women must keep silent.  James has the same ideas.

1.  Responsibility of teachers, 3:1,2a

Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly.We all stumble in many ways. If anyone is never at fault in what he says, he is a perfect man, able to keep his whole body in check.

Moffatt in his translation of verse one gives us a clear sense of what James’ point is:

My brothers, do not crowd in to be teachers; remember, we teachers will be judged with special strictness.

At first glance, it seems as though James is introducing a new topic that has little to do with with verse 2.  However, when we stop and consider what James is saying in these two verses, we realize that teachers teach verbally, and their failures relate to what the words they speak.  Therefore, teaching and the use of the tongue go hand in  hand.

Since he has mentioned the the tongue twice already (1:19, 26), this is obviously a subject of importance and concern to James, the pastor.  More than any other writer in the New Testament, James warns against the dangers of an unruly tongue.  In this chapter, verse 1-12, James discusses taming the tongue and in the following chapter, 4:11-12, James warns his readers not to slander one another, and finally, in one last reference, in chapter 5:12, James tells his readers to speak the truth.   This idea of proper speech was a favorite topic of James’ famous brother, Jesus, who once said this:

But I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken.  (Matthew 12:36)

It should be pointed out that in no way does James mean to suggest that believes should never do what they can do to help another in their Christian walk.  James’ admonitions are intended to remind us of our responsibilities rather than deter us from our duties (Harper).  In point of fact, the New Testament encourages believers to become teachers of the Good News.  Consider again the words of Jesus in this regard:

Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”  (Matthew 28:19-20)

And the writer to the Hebrews actually rebukes his readers for not being good teachers:

In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God’s word all over again. You need milk, not solid food!  (Hebrews 5:12)

The warning is not so much against teaching but against those who want to teach for the prestige of it.  There are some Christians who are attracted to the idea of standing behind the pulpit, leading others, and counseling others, without realizing the terrible responsibility that comes with that position.  The one who teaches is assumed by those listening to have greater knowledge, and such added light demands added living.  If a teacher fails, their judgment will be much more strict because they have less excuse for failure.

James, in the first part of verse 2, reminds his readers that everybody, even the smartest and most diligent of teachers makes mistakes.  Again, Moffat’s insightful translation is  helpful:

Let no more of you take this upon you that God thrusts out; seeing it is so hard not to offend in speaking much.

3.  Some examples, 3:3-8

Words are important, and the words a person uses can tell us a lot about that person. Charles Wesley’s triumphant hymn tells of the power the tongue:

O for a thousand tongues to sing
My great Redeemer’s praise,
The glories of my God and King,
The triumphs of His grace!

And Martin Luther’s hymn “A Mighty Fortress is Our God” mentions the prince of darkness whose:

Rage we can endure,
For lo! his doom is sure,
One little word can fell him.

The amazing power of one word.  It can change course of history.  One of the greatest examples of this is what Jesus said on the Cross.  The very last thing He uttered was “It is finished.”  But in the Greek, it is only one word.

James is going to illustrate the powerful influence of the tongue in using to graphic and practical examples.

A bit, verse 3.  The connection between this verse and the preceding one is obvious.  The so-called perfect man is one who never speaks an ill word and  is able to keep his whole body in check.  The bit in the mouth of a horse does just that.  That is how powerful the tiny tongue can be.  If a man, by using a small bit can control a large animal, then he should certainly be able to control his own tongue.
A rudder, verse 4.  This second example is even more powerful when we remember with what awe the Jews of James’ day regarded the sea.  They had a real love-hate relationship with the sea.  They feared it because it was so dangerous; yet many Jews made their living on the sea.  Even though Israel borders Mediterranean Sea, the Jews were never a sea faring people.  These large ships, says James, are steered against the powerful force of the waves by a tiny piece of wood called a rudder.  It is not the waves or the strong winds that determine the course of the ship, it’s the pilot, and he controls the ship with the rudder.   So if a man can direct the course of large ship against the force of the wind and the waves, then he should be able to control his tongue!

Before giving some more examples, James pauses to apply the two examples he just gave.  Just as bits and rudders are small things, the tongue is a small thing.  Yet, just like the tongue, the bit and the rudder have a powerful influence.  The tongue, says James, “makes great boasts.”  J.B. Philips’ translation is interesting:

The human tongue is physically small, but what tremendous effects it can boast of!

New Testament scholar Curtis Vaughn encapsulates verse five:

It can sway men to violence, or it can move them to the noblest actions.  It can instruct the ignorant, encourage the dejected, comfort the sorrowing, and soothe the dying.  Or, it can crush the human spirit, destroy reputations, spread distrust and hate, and bring nations to the brink of war.

With verse six, James resumes his list of examples:

A fire, verse 6. The inflammatory tongue (Burdick) is responsible a multitude of sins.  Eason comments:

That world of unrighteousness , the tongue, is set among our members.

James compares the tongue to an out of control wildfire that destroys everything in comes near.  But James also has in mind the idea of a spark:  something so small yet can cause a great forest fire.  Bengal makes a fascinating observation:

As the little world of man is an image of the universe, so the tongue is an image of the little world of man.

All the sins that destroy man are to be found in the tongue.  Again, Burdick observes:

There are few sins people commit in which the tongue is not involved.

Because the tongue is so powerfully influential, and so inclined to evil, the tongue corrupts one’s whole being.  Not only that, it can corrupt others, as Lenski has noted:

You and I do not exist merely as separate entities.  Each of us is not a house that is set off by itself…James thinks of us as houses that are set together in a great city.  A fire that is kindled in any one house will spread and become a a great conflagration.

And finally, the Living Bible paraphrases this verse in striking fashion:

And the tongue is a flame of fire.  It is full of wickedness and poisons every part of the body.  And the tongue is set of fire by hell itself, and turn our whole lives into a blazing flame of destruction and disaster.

The phrase “the whole body” has a dual meaning  here in verses 2 and 6.  It refers to the Church, the whole body of believers, and it also refers to the individual person.  The consequences of careless and hurtful words are such that they can hurt the one speaking and can reach out and affect the lives of others.

Man, the ruler of God’s creation, verses 7 and 8.  James concludes his discussion on taming the tongue with one last illustration.  Man is the ruler of all God’s creation and has been given power over all that flies, swims, and crawls.

Man has been able to subdue all kinds of animals for his pleasure.   Yet despite this, man has been unable to get control over his tongue.  He cannot control his own tongue nor can he control others.  This is not to say that God cannot control the speech of a  man, for we know God can.  In the Bible the priest Zachariah was silenced by God, for example.  The Holy Spirit in the lives of believers is able to change the way they speak, if He is allowed to.  But no man on his own can tame his own tongue because its motivation to evil comes from powerful impulses not of his own choosing; the tongue is set on fire by Hell.

In regards to the destructive nature of the tongue, James makes no exceptions:  No man can tame the tongue.   This brief and emphatic conclusion hearkens back to what James said at the beginning of chapter 3:

We all stumble in many ways. If anyone is never at fault in what he says, he is a perfect man, able to keep his whole body in check.  (verse 2)

More than any other Biblical writer, James paints a starkly bleak picture of man’s tongue.  It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison, like a snake that is never still and whose fangs are full of deadly venom.  Our tongues are unstable, elusive, and restless.   James paints an ugly of what sin has done to man.

Washington Irving, a 19th century American writer wrote:

A sharp tongue is the only edged too that grows keener with constant use.

Every culture has recognized the dangerous power of words:

There’s many a slip twixt cup and lip. (German proverb)
A lengthy tongue and early death.  (Persian saying)
Lose lips sink ships.  (American saying)

Finally, some advice from the smartest man who ever lived:

When words are many, sin is not absent,  but he who holds his tongue is wise.  (Proverbs 10:9)

He who guards his lips guards his life, but he who speaks rashly will come to ruin.  (13:3)

(c)  2008 witzEnd

Grace as old as Adam

A study of Romans 4:14-16

For if those who live by law are heirs, faith has no value and the promise is worthless, because law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression.

Therefore, the promise comes by faith, so that it may be by grace and may be guaranteed to all Abraham’s offspring—not only to those who are of the law but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham. He is the father of us all.

One of the questions a pastor gets asked routinely has to do with the salvation, or the possible salvation, of those who may not believe exactly what the Bible says about being “born again.”  What about those who are just very good and moral people, they ask.  What about those who are engaged in exemplary works that benefit all kinds of people but who do not necessarily believe in we refer to as “salvation by grace?”  And of course, the favorite hypothetical case of all:  what about the pygmy on some desert island who has never heard the gospel?

As one who has been asked those things from time to time, let me say how grateful I am that God is the final arbiter is the salvation of all people, and that decisions of that magnitude do not rest any person or group.

However, there are certain principles in the Word of God that are inescapable; that show what one must do to be saved.  And these principles cannot be ignored, nor do they change from generation to generation. If we understand these principles, perhaps we won’t be so surprised when we stand before the Lord and look around at who didn’t make it.  Recall this stinging verse:

Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’  (Matthew 7:23)

Jesus was speaking, not to reprobates or scoundrels, but to the religious leaders of His day!  There will likely be folks in heaven who might have been considered pariahs or outcasts while they were alive.  Rahab the prostitute, for example, will be there, as will the thief that hung on the cross next to Jesus.  They were hardly the types of people you would bring home for Sunday dinner.

It goes without saying that those who defame the name of God and “trample the Son of God under foot” will most certainly not inherit the Kingdom of God (Hebrews 10:28-29).  Yet there is another group of people who will not share in heaven.  These are the ones who know all about God and Jesus.  Maybe they learned sound orthodox theology in Sunday School.  Perhaps they can sing the books of the Bible in order.  But they don’t have a living and vital relationship with Jesus.  They do good things and maybe were even baptized, but they believe their acceptance by God depends on what they do and how they behave.  To those, the Holy Spirit through Paul warns:

Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. You who are trying to be justified by law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.  (Galatians 5:2-4)

1.  A big net

The Church of Jesus Christ is, today, filled with many people who have a mental knowledge of God and who have adopted orthodox views of Jesus Christ, and have confessed Him.  However, their lives didn’t go beyond their “confession,” in other words, there may be “confession” of Christ, but no “consecration” to Him.

That is the essence of our Lord’s parable of the net in Matthew 13:47-48,

“Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. 4When it was full, the fishermen pulled it up on the shore. Then they sat down and collected the good fish in baskets, but threw the bad away.”

That “gospel net” pulls in all kinds of fish, but not all are wanted.  Within the walls of the Church, there are all kinds of people, but not all true followers of Christ.

2.  Works vs. the Promise, verse 14

There exists in the mind of man two ideas of what salvation is.  The human idea is salvation by works; God’s idea is salvation by promise.  These two ideas are diametrically opposed to each other:  works or promise, the law or grace.  They cannot exist together in one person.  The law can be broken, but the promise cannot be.  To whom was the promise made?

When God made his promise to Abraham, since there was no one greater for him to swear by, he swore by himself, saying, “I will surely bless you and give you many descendants.”  (Hebrews 6:13-14)

The promise was made by God to God, but it was for man.  God, being all perfect and all powerful, cannot break His promise.  But because there is no perfect human being, there has never been a complete fulfillment of the law by any human being.  In God’s mind, keeping the law is an all or nothing proposition.  One cannot keep some of it without keeping all of it.   If a good person make it into heaven by partially keeping the law, then, as Barnhouse observed:

[T]hat would mean a slip-shod God and dirty Heaven.

That is the implication of verse 14:

For if those who live by law are heirs, faith has no value and the promise is worthless.

The Greek for “no value” and “promise” are in the perfect tense, suggesting a powerful meaning.  If it were at all possible for someone to enter heaven on the basis of being good and observing the law, then “faith” and “promise” mean nothing.  J.B. Philips translates this verse like this:

The ancient promise given to Abraham and his descendants, that they should eventually possess the world, was given not because of any achievements made through obedience to the Law, but because of the righteousness which had its roots in faith.  For if, after all, they who pin their faith to keeping the Law were to inherit God’s world, it would make nonsense of faith in God Himself, and destroy the whole point of the Promise.

3.  No Law=No Transgression, verse 15

[B]ecause law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression.

Verses 14 and 15 work together to show why Abraham and those who came after him could not inherit God’s promise through the Law or a law.  Those who base their hope of receiving a blessing on what they do “eviscerates the very meaning of ‘faith’ and ‘promise.” (Moo)  The first part of verse 15 supports what Paul was saying in the previous verse.  He simply shows what the law does, not what it cannot do.

Paul says “the law brings wrath.”  Indeed, blind works never brings peace to anybody.  This thought is proven by the second phrase, “where there is no law there is no transgression.”  Barnhouse offers a simple, yet profound illustration of this.  Seventy five years ago there was no law against driving at any speed along the roads and highways of America.  If one had a car that could travel at speeds of 100 miles per  hour or more, that person could  do, if they could find a stretch of road that allowed it.  Of course, horses and pedestrians would have had to flee for their lives!  But no law was broken for no law existed.  The driver might have been guilty of stupidity, but nothing more.  As the years progressed, populations grew, more and more cars appeared on the road, law makers began to write laws against excessive speed.  With that law, it became a transgression to speed, and if caught, the speeder could be fined to the fullest extent of the law.

This is the very simple concept Paul is putting forth here.  There was a time before Moses and the Mosaic Law where God had never revealed His principles of holiness and righteousness.  For example:

  • Cain killed Abel, it was murder plain and simple.  However, the commandment had not been given, therefore there was no transgression.
  • Ham dishonored his father, but this was long  before the commandment “Honor your father and mother” was given.  Again, there was no transgression.

Sin was alive and well before Moses and the Law, but there was no transgression because there was no law.  Key to understanding this is the word “transgression,” from the Greek parabasis. The only time Paul uses this word is in reference to a person’s willful disobedience to a law or command that they have been made responsible for.  It should be noted, however, that this does not mean that Cain or Ham were saved.  Negatively, the coming of the Law made people conscious of their guilt in a definite way, and in a positive way, the coming of the Law made it possible for the Holy Spirit to convict people of their wrong doing, and plant within them the desire to be saved from their sins and transgressions.

Note these verses:

What, then, was the purpose of the law? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed to whom the promise referred had come. The law was put into effect through angels by a mediator.  (Gal. 3:19)

And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.  (1 Tim. 2:14)

No doubt, transgression is a sin, but not every sin is a transgression.  Every time a human being falls short of what God expects of them, they sin.  But only when they purposefully disobey a commandment God has given them do they commit a transgression.  Therefore, a transgression is more serious than a sin and will result in greater judgment.

The fact that, as Paul has indicated, the Law produces wrath, and the corresponding fact that as believers we are not objects of the wrath but instead objects of God’s promise, has led some to conclude that believers are not under or subject to the Law.  In a general sense that is true, however to be free from the Law does not mean that we are free to be lawless.  God deals with His creation in different ways and different times.  In Romans, Paul is teaching that after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, the human raced passed into yet another aspect of God’s dealing with them.  From that event until the next age, God deals with man through grace, not law.

What good was the Law?

Every human being is an incurable addict.  We are addicted to sin.  And like any addict, we will do anything to feed our addiction, even going so far as to justify it and make it seem right.  Simply put, that is the answer to the question, “What good was the Law?”

While the Law was never given to save anybody, it was invaluable in showing sinful people the true state of their lives in relation to God’s ideal for them.  It was necessary to convict them of wrong and show them the right.  With the coming of the Holy Spirit, the Law’s work was over.  What the Law did, the Holy Spirit now does.

But even as far back as Adam, grace was still in operation.  If God determined to save Adam, then Adam would be saved.  If God determined to save Abel and condemn Cain, it was on the grounds of His sovereignty and love alone, for neither brother was righteous in God’s sight.  God has always been a God of grace, but He gave the Law to show sinful human beings the folly of their addiction and to point to them to the only cure:  a power outside of themselves.  In the OT, that “power” was the Promise of God.  In the NT, that “power” is a relationship with Jesus Christ.

4.  An inheritance by faith, verse 16

Therefore, the promise comes by faith, so that it may be by grace and may be guaranteed to all Abraham’s offspring—not only to those who are of the law but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham. He is the father of us all.

Lastly, this group of verses tells us that these two competing ideas of salvation are mutually exclusive.  If you are working for your salvation, then you won’t fully commit to the grace expressed in Christ.

Nobody wants nothing.  Even the most hardened of sinners wants good things, even eternal life.  A person would have to be insane to choose Hell over Heaven.  But Satan is the master of men’s minds and has successfully confused many people into thinking they may gain Heaven by working for it, rather than merely on the basis in faith in God’s grace.

Paul makes it crystal clear that the promise comes only by faith to all who exercise it, whether they are “of the law” or “of the faith of Abraham.”  In other words, faith in Jesus Christ is one true equalizer of all people, whether Jew, or Gentile.  At the moment of faith is birthed in one’s heart, that one becomes a “child of Abraham” because they are exercising the same kind of faith as Abraham did.

Eternal, life-changing concepts

(1)    Faith is distinct from the Law.  In other words, the Law is something you do, faith is more of an attitude of heart and mind.  Calvin compares faith to “open hands.”  Believing means that we stretch out our arms and open our hands to receive all that God wants to give us.  In our achievement-oriented society, it is difficult to practice this; we, in our misguided efforts to be obedient believers want to “earn” the blessings of God by our deeds and actions, thus placing God in our debt.  But that is not how God operates.  He gives.  He does not barter.

(2)    Faith’s power rests, not in itself, but in the One in whom we place our faith.  One of the most famous questions in sports history was posed by ABC commentator Al Michaels at the end of the 1980 Olympic hockey series between the United States and the USSR in response to the American’s astonishing victory.  “Do you believe in miracles?” he asked rhetorically.  As is evidenced by books, magazines, TV shows, and so on, Americans do indeed believe in miracles, angels, and the supernatural in general.  However, the Bible never, ever discusses belief in those things, it speaks of a belief in God, the One responsible for the miracles.

This was the kind of faith Abraham had.  This was the kind of faith that was credited to Him as righteousness.  Abraham believed in the One who could bring life a barren womb.  Abraham believed in the God in back of the promise.  But Abraham’s belief didn’t stop there.  Abraham had such strong belief in and faith in God, the he spoke of God’s promises as though they  had already been given.  The fact is, Abraham would not live to the majority of God’s promises come to fruition.

(3)    Faith is based on God’s Word, not on the evidence of what we see.  God’s Word was all Abraham had.  The key to living a Christian life that is full of hope and expectation is having faith in God that is consistent and never wavering.  The ultimate reality for the believer is not what they see and can experience in the physical realm, but rather what what they cannot see:  the spiritual realm.  That is why the Word of God must be ever before us.  As we remember the great promises in and as we meditate on it, it won’t be long before its spiritual realities become more real to us that the world around  us.

(c)  2008 WitzEnd

Practicing the Word, Part Six

Faith and Action, 2:14-26

We come now to the famous portion of James which led to Martin Luther’s depreciation of James’ whole letter, which he described as “a right strawy” epistle.  One of Luther’s problems with James is the seeming contradictions between James and Paul in the area of justification by faith alone (Romans 4 and Galatians 3).  Both writers use Abraham as their example to prove their apparently opposite views.  Compare especially James 2:21 with Romans 4,

Was not our ancestor Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar?  (James 2:21)

What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather, discovered in this matter? If, in fact, Abraham was justified by works, he had something to boast about—but not before God. What does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.” (Romans 4:1-3)

But is there a contradiction between the teachings of these two men?  As we study what Paul wrote and what James wrote it is clear that they are using similar terms but with different meanings.  “Faith” as Paul used the word is saving faith, that is, a person’s relationship with Christ as a result of what Christ did for them.  For James, “faith” refers to something much more shallow:  a belief in something or someone.  So when Paul writes of “works” he means “works of the law” performed by a person in order to secure or maintain their salvation.  But James, when he speaks of “works” refers to the natural outcome of our salvation.  Paul might call these kinds of works “the fruit of the Spirit” (Galatians 5:22).  So upon closer examination there really are not contradictions between James and Paul.  In fact, a much simper way to look at these two views of faith is this:

Paul writes about faith as seen from God’s perspective;
James writes about faith as seen from man’s perspective.

God sees the redeemed heart; no works are necessary to demonstrate one’s salvation to God.  Man cannot see another’s heart, so that same faith needs to be demonstrated so man can see another’s salvation.  This reminds us of what Jesus said in John 3:21,

But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God.

1.  When faith is not faith, 2:14-17

A.  A worthless profession, verse 14

What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if people claim to have faith but have no deeds? Can such faith save them?

Like any good preacher, James poses two questions which he knows will be answered in the negative.  Just as before, James prefaces his rebuke by identifying himself with his readers, using “brothers and sisters.”  These questions must be read carefully or James’ carefully crafted illustration will be lost.  These two questions:

“If people have faith but have no deeds?”
“Can such a faith save them?”

actually show that faith not accompanied by good deeds is of no saving value.  The questions are predicated on the case of a person who “claims” to have saving faith, but James does not say they actually do, in fact the implication is that they have a “profession” of faith but not a “possession” of faith.   Reading this verse in the Greek, James’ meaning is clearer:  This faith cannot save him, can it? In other words, saying you have faith but not demonstrating you have it is a good indication you don’t really have this saving faith.  Faith without the accompanying deeds cannot save anybody; it takes the kind of faith that proves itself in deeds to save someone.

B.  A parable, verses 15-17

Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food.  If one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

To illustrate the absurdity of claiming to have salvation but without the corresponding good deeds, James tells an absurd parable.  In the Greek, this impoverished brother or sister (note they are believers) is actually naked (Greek gymnoi) This parable is very similar to an argument advanced by John:

If any one of you has material possessions and sees a brother or sister in need but has no pity on them, how can the love of God be in you?  (1 John 3:17)

The inappropriate response to this destitute individual is shocking:  “Go and put some clothes on and get something to eat.”  The phrase, “What good is it?” shows James’ impatience with kind of behavior.  Clark’s comments on this verse are interesting:

Your saying to them, while you give them nothing, will just profit them as much as your professed faith, without works which are the genuine fruits of true faith, will profit you in the day when God comes to sit in judgment on your soul.

Verse 17 drives the point home:  if there is no action behind a profession of faith, then that faith is dead.  Of note here is that James does not deny the this individual has faith, just that it is the wrong kind of faith.  What kind of faith is James referring to?  A good example of this “dead faith” is seen in Acts 26, in the case of King Agrippa.  Paul had been explaining salvation to the King and said this:

“The king is familiar with these things, and I can speak freely to him. I am convinced that none of this has escaped his notice, because it was not done in a corner.  King Agrippa, do you believe the prophets? I know you do.”  (Acts 26:27-27)

Agrippa had, what we might call, “intellectual faith,” but it was dead.  Because of his religious background, Agrippa knew the Old Testament teachings, but he didn’t allow those teachings to influence how he lived, therefore, to him, they were dead.

2.  An objection answered, 2:18-19

But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.”   Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.  You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.

At this juncture, James introduces the views of an imaginary opponent who wants to separate faith and works, suggesting that a person may have one without the other.  James does not argue the priority of works over faith; he merely states matter-of-factly that there can be no valid Christian faith apart from works of righteousness.  Some commentators (Bowman) think that James has in mind Christians and Jews.  The Jew claims works and the Christian claims faith.  It is probably best understood that James is merely making another illustration here.  Using two hypothetical people again, James says that faith must be demonstrated by good deeds.

Faith is an attitude of the inner man, and it can only be seen as it influences the actions of the one who possesses it.  Mere profession of faith proves nothing as to its reality; only action can demonstrate faith’s genuineness.  (Burdick)

With verse 19 James confronts the idea that believing a creedal statement is faith enough.  The creedal statement he refers to is Deuteronomy 6:4,

Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one.

Pious Jews loved to claim this creed as evidence of their faith.  James says that even the demons believe this, so it is evidence of nothing.  Like King Agrippa, simply believing a doctrine or a creed amounts to nothing in terms of salvation.  We might say that merely going to church doesn’t make anybody a Christian.  Believing in God and Christian doctrines must be accompanied by a corresponding changed life, marked by acts of righteousness.

John Wesley makes these observations on those with intellectual faith:

This proves only that you have the same faith as devils…they…tremble at the dreadful expectation of eternal torments.  So far is that faith from either justifying or saving them that have it.

3.  Evidence from history, 2:20-26

James turns from parables and illustrations to concrete proofs from Israel’s own history; evidence from their very own Scriptures, that what he has been writing is true.  Clearly, by verse 20 James is losing patience, saying, “You foolish man.”  Gone is the softer “brothers and sisters!”  The Greek says, “O vain man.”  Of this man, Trench says he is one “in whom higher wisdom has found no entrance, but who is puffed up with a vain conceit of his own insight.”

A.  The example of Abraham, verses 21-24

Was not our father Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar?  You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did.  And the scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called God’s friend.  You see that people are justified by what they do and not by faith alone.

At the outset, it sounds like James is saying that Abraham was justified by works in contradiction to Paul, who wrote that:

So also Abraham “believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.”  (Galatians 3:6)

Both James and Paul quote from Genesis 15:6 in support of their different arguments:

James in support of Abraham’s actions;
Paul in support of Abraham’s faith.

We reconcile this tension between action and faith like this:  Paul refers to Abraham’s faith at the time God promised to give him a child.  The story is recounted in Genesis 15:1-6 and because Abraham believed God and accepted God’s promise on faith, without any proof whatsoever, he was commended by God.  In God’s estimation, that kind of amazing faith made Abraham a righteous man.  On the other hand, James refers to Abraham’s faith in Genesis 22:1-19, where Abraham was on the verge of offering up his promised son to God as a sacrifice.  He obeyed God, doing exactly what God had told him to do, even though it didn’t make any sense to him.  The faith that was in Abraham in Genesis 15 expressed itself in Genesis 22 by his actions of obedience.  Tasker put it this way:

James is here speaking not of the original imputation of righteousness to Abraham in virtue of his faith, but of the infallible proof that the faith which resulted in that imputation was real faith.  It expressed itself in such total obedience to God that thirty years later Abraham was ready, in submission to the divine will, to offer Isaac, his son.  The term justified in this verse means, in effect, shown to be justified.

So Abraham was declared by God to be justified, then thirty years later Abraham demonstrated that he was, in fact, justified because of his actions.

In verse 24, James offers his summary of Abraham saying, in effect, that a person is justified by faith “but not by faith alone.”  It is by faith and by what the person does.  If we just read that verse by itself, we don’t get the whole picture.  It gives the impression that, in some measure, our salvation depends on our actions.  But when we take what James has taught with what Paul taught, especially in Ephesians 2:8-9, we see that faith and actions work hand-in-hand; that deeds complete faith.  Good deeds are the outworking of a person’s inner faith.

Remember, James is writing to people who had a superficial faith; they professed their faith but apparently their behavior didn’t back up their confession.  Paul wrote to combat false teachers who taught a form of legalism that said good works was all a person needed.  Two writers, two different audiences, two different reasons, yet with one goal:  to get Christians to live like they are supposed to live.  Consider the power of this statement:

For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.  (Ephesians 2:10)

No, James didn’t write that, although it sounds very much like something we would expect him to write.  Paul wrote it.

B.  The example of Rahab, 2:25

In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?

The second example James cites for good works is Rahab.  She is commended by James, as well as by the author to the Hebrews for the outworking of her faith in  assisting the spies in the capture of Jericho (Joshua 2:1-21).  Why choose as his examples such extreme opposites:  Abraham, the father of the Jewish nation and Rahab, a prostitute?  James’ principle is a universal one, that applies to all believers; there are no exceptions to the rule that “faith without works is dead.”

In Hebrews 11:17-19, 31, we are told that Rahab’s action in hiding the spies was “by faith.”  James agrees with that, and expands on it saying that she was justified by her works in the sense that what she did proved that she had faith.  Moffatt wrote:

She believed in God, and evidenced her faith by the trouble she took in receiving the scouts and assisting them to escape, at the risk of her own life.  No mere belief this!

Conclusion

James’ conclusion to this matter is masterful.  Weymouth translates verse 26 like this:

Just as a human body without a spirit is lifeless, so also faith is lifeless without obedience.

So serious is the subject of “good deeds” that James revisits it later on, briefly, in the fourth chapter, where we read this:

So then, if you know the good you ought to do and don’t do it, you sin.

The Prison Epistles, Part 9

Introduction to Philippians

In Paul’s letter to the Philippians, we find something more than just doctrine and theology.  It goes without saying that doctrine and theology are essential for the Christian to know, especially in this day with so much false teaching flooding the Church.  Some Christians feel intimated by those two words, and even threatened by them.  They feel doctrine and theology are the purview of preachers and doctors of theology.   But doctrine and theology shape how Christians view the world in which they live and how they relate to their heavenly Father.

While Philippians is overflowing doctrine, there is much more “experience” and heart in it than in any other epistle.  What Paul has done in this letter is to expose the proper Christian experience in a world full of hardship and disappointments.  In it, we read of the all the resources available to the believer to get the most of his relationship with God yet living in a sinful world.  As Darby has succinctly observed:

God has condescended to furnish us with this beautiful picture of the ideal Christian life, as well as the truths that enlighten us, and the rules that direct our walk.

The special significance of Philippians in 21st Century America

The quest for peace is on!  In order find peace of mind and a break from the hustle and bustle that characterizes our society today, Americans are swallowing tons of tranquilizers.  In addition to the drugs we consume, there are the tons of so-called “self-help” tranquilizing books that overflow bookstore shelves, promising to return sanity to our lives.   These overnight best-sellers, written perfect looking men and women who grace their covers with their sparkling, toothy smiles, contain the “keys” to finding happiness, fulfillment, joy, and peace in life.

However, these kinds of things are troublesome for a number of reasons:

  • First, whenever the drug or “key” fails to comport with reality, whatever peace of mind they bring will not last;
  • Second, no matter how hard we work at it, we cannot ignore sin.  No amount of medication, positive thinking or mental push-ups can deal with the sin problem that plagues us all;
  • Third, the only true and lasting peace is the peace that comes from God.  This kind of peace cannot be bought, learned, or discovered using pills, booze, books, or self-talk;
  • Last, those trusting in tranquilizers, whether books, pills, music, relationships, or vacations are likely operating on the false assumption that spiritual turmoil is an evil in itself.  But it is usually better to face reality than to try to escape it.  Evasion or escapism leads to spiritual apathy.  Confronting the facts about yourself is the only course which can lead to “the peace of God that passes all understanding.”

If a person wants to know true and lasting peace, they must turn to God, and more specifically to Philippians 4:7,

And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.

This short letter was written by a man who had found that peace.  Paul had found that most elusive of life’s treasures.  It’s not money.  Or fame.  Or family.  Or youth.  Paul had found happiness.  Listen to him:

Rejoice in the Lord always. I will say it again: Rejoice!  (4:4)

I am not saying this because I am in need, for I have learned to be content whatever the circumstances. I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty. I have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want. I can do everything through him who gives me strength. (4:11-13)

Those are amazing verses, especially in light of the fact that they were written by a man in prison.  So, the reasons for studying this little gem are:

  • It reveals the secret of true happiness.  How this happiness can be obtained is clearly revealed in this letter.
  • It reveals the man who had learned this secret.  Philippians is one of the most personal of all Paul’s letters.
  • It reveals the Christ who taught Paul this secret.  Christ is our pattern and our enabler, and He is portrayed in this letter in the greatness of His condescending love.

Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 408,384 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 282 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket