Posts Tagged 'Silas'

FORCEFULLY ADVANCING: The Church in Acts, Part 3

Second Missionary Journey

Acts 16:1—10

Acts 13 and 14 tell the story of the amazing successes our intrepid missionaries had in their missionary endeavors in and around Asia Minor.  Not only had Christian churches popped up all over in their wake, but two very important things happened at the same time.

First, there was the now-famous Jerusalem Council that met to consider Paul and Barnabas’ ministry among the Gentiles (Acts 15).  There was tremendous opposition to the “new thing” God was doing among some parts of the Church.  The decision of the Council was profound and far-reaching:  Gentiles who found Christ were not obligated to observe the Jewish Law.  This single decision was the turning point in the history of Christianity, because it forever separated the Church of Jesus Christ from the local Jewish synagogues.  It also paved the way for Paul and his friends to preach the Gospel freely to anyone who would listen, whether they be Jew or Gentile, Greek or Roman.

Second, was the surprising separation of Barnabas and Paul (15:36—41).  Given the success the team had, it would be logical for them to continue ministering together.  But the Lord had other ideas.  As they planned their second journey, Barnabas wanted to take John Mark with them again.  Previously, he had been their assistant but had left them t return home.  Paul felt that Mark was not mature enough to travel with them; perhaps he was afraid Mark would up and leave them in the lurch again.  Verse 39—

They had such a sharp disagreement that they parted company. Barnabas took Mark and sailed for Cyprus.

Barnabas took his cousin, Mark, and Paul went his way, taking his new friend, Silas, with him into Syria and Cilicia.  What could have been a cause of hard feelings resulted in something very good.  Now, using the personalities of two men, the Lord had two, instead of one, missionary groups.  Barnabas, an effective preacher and missionary in his own right, was able to train and strengthen young Mark so that the young man would become one of the great Christian leaders and writers of his day.  Paul was teamed up with Silas, a man with incredible potential who worked well with Paul.

For a very full discussion of the events of Acts 16:16—40, please refer to:

An Exposition of Acts 16:31

1.  The Spirit Guides

It is in this section of Acts that we are first introduced to a young man named Timothy.  We know that later Paul would write a couple letters to this young pastor, but here Luke describes the initial meeting.

Paul (note Luke does not mention Silas, although they did travel together) came to the Galatian border town of Derbe by way of the Cilician Gates.  It was a rough journey from Tarsus and over the Taurus Mountains; in all, about 80 miles of very bad road.  From Derbe, Paul and Silas went to Lystra.  It was here that Paul would meet young Timothy and his family.  His mother’s name was Eunice (2 Timothy 1:5) and was Jewess married to a Greek man.  Some scholars believe that Timothy’s father was dead by this time, because both Eunice and Lois, Timothy’s mother and grandmother, were strong spiritual influences in his life.  Lois was a devout believer who taught Timothy the Scriptures from his infancy (2 Tim. 1:5; 3:15).  Some have speculated Eunice and Lois became Christians during Paul’s first missionary journey.  From his letters, it seems Paul knew Timothy’s family well, mentioning them by name.

Paul adopted Timothy as his spiritual son; we might use the word “mentor” to describe their relationship.  Obviously Paul saw great potential in young Timothy as he was “well spoken of” by those who knew him.  Just how young was Timothy?  In 1 Timothy 4:12, we read this—

Don’t let anyone look down on you because you are young, but set an example for the believers in speech, in life, in love, in faith and in purity.

That was written some 14 years after the events of Acts 16.  If Timothy was, at most, 30 when he received his first letter from Paul, that would make him a teenager when he became Paul and Silas’ traveling companion.

Interestingly, the man who argued so strenuously against circumcision now insisted Timothy be circumcised prior to the troupe setting out on their missionary journey.  Had Paul had a change of theological heart?  Not at all; this was a practical, not spiritual, decision.  It demonstrated Paul’s longstanding philosophy of being “all things to all people” in order that he “might by all means save some” (1 Corinthians 9:22).  Because of his mixed heritage, Timothy had no real standing among the Jews or the Greeks.  In fact, in Judaism, his mother’s marriage was considered illegal.  To nip any controversy in the bud regarding Timothy’s fitness to bear the Gospel among the Jews, Paul had him circumcised.

The ordination of Timothy was a great event in the history of the Church.  Paul, not comfortable about Mark, discerned something in Timothy that he deemed useful to the progress of the Gospel.

(a)  Blocked by the Spirit, verses 6, 7

Looking at all of Paul’s journeys, we realize that they were successful because of both spiritual guidance and careful planning.  Paul depended on the leading of the Holy Spirit, but he also made plans, bought tickets, made reservations for accommodations, etc.  Not only that, Paul also seemed to have a strategy for where to preach the Gospel.  Whether God’s idea or his, Paul’s routine was to preach the Gospel in large, important cities, where trade and commerce took place, where travelers would be exposed to his message and take it back home with them.  Sticking to his plan, Paul had planned to head west into modern Turkey.  Perhaps he desired to visit Ephesus, but we are told that the Holy Spirit had other plans.  This is a great lesson to learn:  it is wise to make plans, but it is even wiser to be willing to alter our plans at the discretion of God.

The prompting of the Spirit was strong and unmistakable.  The Greek word translated “kept” in the NIV means “to hinder” or “to restrain.”  Our missionaries were literally being “held back” by the Spirit!  Technically, the Spirit did not forbid them to travel in the area, He just did not want them preaching there.  As to why, we do not know, and we also have no idea how the Spirit communicated to Paul.  The co-operation of God and man in the Work of the Lord was common in New Testament times (“It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us…”) as it should be common in our times.  The Holy Spirit leads us several distinct ways today:

  • He may direct circumstances around us so that the guidance from His unseen Hand is unmistakable;
  • He may enlarge our mental capabilities and heighten our faculties so that without our conscious knowledge, we think and see more clearly than usual;
  • He may speak to us through those around us, whether we are close to them or not.

It is imperative that we who follow Christ actually follow Christ; we should never cease to pray for His will, trusting that in His providence He will make it made known to us.

(b) Guided by a vision, verses 8—10

Paul and his friends had been stopped by the Holy Spirit, and now that same Holy Spirit communicated to Paul is an obvious fashion:  he has a vision at night.  Having these kinds of visions was common to the the apostles; consider Acts 9:10, 12; 10:3; 17, 19; 11:5; 12:9; 16:6—10; 18:9.  In this vision, the man who appeared to Jesus offering guidance was not Jesus or an angel; at Troas Paul saw a man begging him to come to Macedonia.

Although not in Paul’s original itinerary, Macedonia in the first century was a happening place.  It was surrounded by other large metropolitan centers, with Greece just to the south.  It was ruled by the Romans and the citizens of Macedonia spoke Greek fluently.  It was a simple enough deviation from the plan to move from one continent, Asia, to another, Europe, thanks to a common language and legal system.

The man in the vision said to Paul—

“Come over to Macedonia and help us.”  (verse 9b)

The first part of the plea refers to our band of missionaries crossing the Aegean Sea, and the second part is clear request for help.  The use of the Greek verb suggests “coming to one’s aid,” and was used in Mark 9:24—

Immediately the boy’s father exclaimed “I do believe; help me overcome my unbelief!”

In that instance, the request for help was linked to the need for spiritual help, and clearly this was how Paul understood his request.   The man from Macedonia, though, was not speaking just on his behalf; the people of that entire region were ready to hear and receive the Gospel.

2.  The importance of obedience

In history, turning points are few but significant.  These turning points may take the form of a conflict, like the Civil War or the civil rights movement.  Sometimes turning points are achievements, like the invention of the telegraph or the automobile or penicillin.  Paul’s decision to go to Macedonia was a turning point in every sense of the word.  Because Paul was obedient to the Holy Spirit, the Gospel went westward into Europe, and as a result of that, the western world would be evangelized.  Responding to the prompting of God, whether as the result of circumstances or visions, is never a trivial thing.

On a smaller, though no less significant note, had Paul not journeyed to Troas, another turning point would have been missed and our firsthand historical record would be nonexistent.    It is here, at Troas, that the first of the “we” sections occurs.  It was at Troas that Luke joined our missionary group.  Just how these two men met is an intriguing consideration.  Some scholars have suggested that Paul was sick and in need of continued medical care.  According to Paul’s own testimony, Luke was or became a good friend—

Luke, the beloved physician, and Demas, greet you.  (Colossians 4:14)

Coincidentally, the foremost medical school of the day was located at Tarsus, Paul’s hometown, and Paul was likely educated at the university there.  The school at Tarsus was the greatest in the world at that time, ranking just behind Athens and Alexandria.  It is possible that these two men, towering servants of Christ, met years earlier at school and by chance recognized each other at Troas.   Even if that is mere wild speculation, the fact that these two men would find each other at all in that teeming city is one more example of how God moves and manipulates people and things.

This whole story gives us a valuable lesson in how God guides us.  Paul was like a man walking down a corridor, looking for a door that was unlocked.  To his left and to his right, he finds locked doors or doors with a “Do Not Enter” sign hanging on them.  So he keeps on walking, frustrated as he approaches to be a blank wall.  Yet the closer he gets, the clear he sees, and suddenly that blank wall parts; the double door swings open revealing an auditorium full of people, waiting to hear the Gospel. (Earl)

Like Paul, we may be tempted to get frustrated or impatient as we walk down the corridor of our lives.   And like Paul, we may keep in walking as we approach our land’s end.   But just as Paul’s journey of faith opened more doors, so ours will in time.  God closes smaller doors all along the way, because He has other, bigger ones, waiting for us to walk through.  It’s a lifelong journey of faith.

(c)  2009 WitzEnd

FORCEFULLY ADVANCING: The Church in Acts, Part 2

414050

For Everyone, No Strings

Acts 15

As we approach Acts 15, Paul and Barnabas’ first missionary journey has ended.  Thanks to the work of these two great missionaries, Christian churches were now flourishing all over Galatia.  In the face of opposition from people and the elements, the church of Jesus Christ was forging ahead into new territory thanks to this dynamic duo of Christ’s disciples.  You would think that the mother church back in Jerusalem would be thrilled to see this happening.  Yet the opposite was true:  all these Gentile converts in Galatia caused a controversy in Jerusalem.  Many of the converts in Jerusalem were Jews, and some were Pharisees who believed that Gentiles needed to convert to Judaism before they could become Christians.  In other words, to them, salvation included faith in Christ and observance of the Mosaic Law.   Today such thinking seems ridiculous, but in the very early years of the church, this controversy could have torn it apart.

The convening of the first church council occurred sometime around 49 AD, and although since then there have been many, many church councils that decided things like the inspiration of Scripture, the nature of God, and other doctrinal issues, the Jerusalem Council was one of the most important events for the early Church.  It was of vital importance to answer this question:  “Are Gentile Christians required to keep the Jewish Law?  The fate of the Church depended on a correct answer, for if the answer was “Yes,” then Christianity would have forever been viewed as just another sect of Judaism; if the answer was “No,” then the Church would be able to advance it’s Great Commission, free from any encumbrance.

1.  Troublemakers cause trouble, 15:1—12

(a)  The problem, verse 1

Some men came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the brothers: “Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved.”

This is the crux of the issue and the reason behind the Jerusalem Council.  Of course, the question really had nothing to do with circumcision but rather what was involved with salvation.   The troublemakers were identified merely as “some men.”  They were Jewish Christians, probably Pharisees, who went to Antioch with no apostolic authority to impose their own style of Christianity on the believers there.

While these men clearly had a grasp on the teachings of Jesus, they clung to their old religion.  What they did, in addition to adding to the Word of God, was to dismantle what Paul and Barnabas had achieved in the Gentile world.  They had preached the Gospel faithfully and all of a sudden for some unknown men to march into a church and begin to contradict the Word must have been confusing, given the fact that believers did not possess a written Bible yet!

(b)  The delegation, verses 2—5

This brought Paul and Barnabas into sharp dispute and debate with them. So Paul and Barnabas were appointed, along with some other believers, to go up to Jerusalem to see the apostles and elders about this question….Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to obey the law of Moses.”  (verses 2, 5)

The phrase “sharp dispute” is probably Luke’s polite way of describing Paul and Barnabas’ attitude to these men and their destructive teaching!  In fact, to be demanding that Gentile believers adhere to and fulfill the Law of Moses in order to be saved showed that they while they believed Christ to be the Messiah, they viewed the Law from a Jewish, not a Christian viewpoint.  Really, these Judaizers were practicing a form of racial discrimination within the Church.

The Antiochean believers showed great wisdom by appointing the apostles to go to Jerusalem to seek advice about this.  Decades before Paul would write his “Pastoral Epistles,” the leaders or overseers of this church were practicing Paul’s brand of pastoral theology—

[Qualification of elders]…not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money.  (1 Timothy 3:3)

And the Lord’s servant must not quarrel; instead, he must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful.  (2 Timothy 2:24)

Jerusalem was the center of the early Church; those who had lived and worked with Jesus personally were there and they had ultimate authority.  Jerusalem would remain the headquarters of the Christian church until 70 AD, when the base of power and operation shifted from the east (Jerusalem) to the west (Rome).  One always either “came down from” or “went up to” Jerusalem.

Luke does not tell us who the “other believers” were who made up the Antiochean delegation.   In Galatians 2:1, we have a clue, though, as to the identity of one of them—

Fourteen years later I went up again to Jerusalem, this time with Barnabas. I took Titus along also.

Since Luke never mentions Titus’ name in Acts, some scholars have thought Titus was Luke’s brother, and out of modesty the physician-historian-author refrains from mentioning him by name.  As they traveled “up to Jerusalem,” the group continued to the work of the Lord by testifying everywhere what God had done.  The result:  This news made all the brothers very glad. Obviously the only people who had a problem with the work of Paul and Barnabas were the Judaizers.

(c)  The debate, verses 6—12

A group of Christians had accused other Christians of adding something to the Gospel, and so the elders and apostles came together to discuss this divisive issue.  The “discussion” was likely hot and furious and Peter was the first to rise up and address it.  Considering the subject matter, it was obvious Peter should be the one to talk about it.  We cannot be sure how it had been since Peter’s experience in Caesarea, but it could have been over a decade since his experiences with Cornelius and his family.

Still, Peter was not the central figure of the Jerusalem church at this time; James had assumed a much larger role in leadership, but Peter’s word carried some weight among the Jewish converts.  Peter’s argument was that the conversion of Cornelius (though he doesn’t name him by name) had been a precedent established by God of His decision to reach out to the Gentiles.  Because of this, Paul and Barnabas’ approach was exactly according to God’s will.   In fact, in regards to the Judaizers teaching, Peter makes the amazing statement—

Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of the disciples a yoke that neither we nor our fathers have been able to bear?  (verse 10)

That sounds a lot like something Paul would write, but it was Peter recognizing that God was doing a radical thing.  Furthermore, he reaches a conclusion that seems obvious to us but it was new to them; all people are the same before God, their Creator.

2.  Wise counsel, swift resolution, verses 13—21

(a)  Prophecy fulfilled, verses 13—18

James, our Lord’s brother, presided over the Jerusalem Council was the next to speak.   Down through church history, James was known as “James the Just” because of his piety and because of the fact that, though a follower of Jesus Christ, he carefully observed the Law.   Naturally, the Judaizers thought they could depend on him to support their cause.  What they found was that James, far from having a narrow view of things, was broadminded enough to realize that what Peter said was true; God does accept repentant man for who they are, and in fact, He always has.

He quotes from the book of Amos, applying the text to the conversion and acceptance of the Gentile Cornelius, affirming to all the Gospel includes all—

“In that day I will restore David’s fallen tent. I will repair its broken places, restore its ruins, and build it as it used to be, so that they may possess the remnant of Edom and all the nations that bear my name,” declares the LORD, who will do these things. (Amos 9:11—12)

As James interpreted the passage, the first part refers to the death and resurrection of Jesus and verse 16 of Acts 15 relates Christ’s death to the phrases “David’s fallen tent” and “it’s ruins.”  His resurrection is illustrated in the phrases “I will rebuild” and “I will restore.”

Clearly in James’ mind, the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ was the singular event that changed the direction of humanity; Christ was lifted up to draw all people unto Himself—

Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up.  (John 3:14)

But I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself.”  (John 12:32)

The “all men” included Gentiles, which James indicated was part of God’s plan from then very beginning, verse 18.

(b)  Agreement, verses 19—21

Despite James’ devotion to the Jewish Law, he did not side with the Judaizers.  Verse 19 literally reads:  “Therefore I, for my part, judge…”   James’ words carried weight and authority in the early Church.  His decision was wise and simple:  the Gentile believers were to be free from keeping the Jewish Law.  In his decision, James uses a very rare verb translated “not make it difficult” which means literally, “stop annoying.”   The false teachers were pestering and bothering genuine Christians with their ideas.

Charles Erdman writes that James’s decision included three key points:

  • Liberty, verse 19
  • Purity, verse 20
  • Co-operation between Jews and Gentiles, verse 21

It is interesting that James said, “We should write to them…” That is exactly what Paul did.

3.  Affirming the Gospel, verses 22—35

Curiously, Luke does not describe the Council’s reaction to James’ proposals, but given the context and the collection of Paul’s letters, it seems clear that they agreed with and supported his ideas.

(a)  Letter of reconciliation, verses 22—29

In the letter sent to Antioch, Syria, and Cilicia, some new men are mentioned by name;  Silas would become Paul’s partner in his next missionary journey.   Of this letter, some 200 years later Clement of Alexandria remarked that is was “the Catholic epistle of all the Apostles” and that is was conveyed by the faithful hands of Paul himself.”  What we read in these verses is most likely an exact, verbatim copy made by Luke, incorporated in his history.

This phrase is significant—

It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us…(verse 28)

This shows us two important aspects of church leadership.  First, there must be co-operation between God and man in the decision-making process.   Even though the Council was made up of human leaders, the true Head of the Council was Jesus Christ and He guided the men by His Holy Spirit.  Second, these human leaders set aside their own ambitions and agendas and spoke with one voice of solidarity:  it seemed good to US.  They were able speak in unity because they all paid attention to the Holy Spirit.

God sees all people as the same in Christ Jesus; and these men exemplified this desired unity be acting in unity.

(b)  The wonder of unity, verses 30—35

The entire congregation at Antioch, and maybe many of the outlying assemblies, gathered together to hear the letter read.  One can only imagine the scene of joy as the people heard confirmation of what they already knew, yet began to doubt because of the meddling of false teachers.  They must have also been relieved to know that they did not need to learn a whole new set of rules to live by.

There is freedom in the Gospel.  There is encouragement in the Gospel.  The Gospel is never a burden to anyone.  But the Law, and the rules of man, bring only confusion and condemnation.

The two new men, Judas and Silas, were preachers who jumped in to encourage the believers in Antioch.  Obviously, Paul and Silas worked well together, and some time later the two men would work even closer together.

It’s amazing how the Lord uses circumstances to lead people in and out of our lives to accomplish His eternal purposes.

Conclusion

There are many lessons to be learned here.  From the importance to discerning and obeying the leading of the Holy Spirit to discerning and overcoming our prejudices; may we all learn to see other people as God sees us.

(c)  2009 WitzEnd

Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 410,602 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 295 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket