Archive for November, 2011

HOW ALL MEN BECAME SINNERS

Romans 5:12—21

Paul has gone to great lengths to show that all men are sinners. Without exception, every human being is born a sinner. And the only answer to man’s sinful condition is Jesus Christ, who was born sinless, remained sinless, but was more than a mere man. He alone can redeem even the worst. The question Paul now endeavors to answer is one as old man himself: How is it that all men became sinners? To answer that question, the great apostle goes as far back in time as you can go: to the very beginning, to the first man, Adam. We will learn that what Adam did affected every single human being that followed him.

This whole section of Romans is so difficult to read in English, that many Bible readers (and Bible teachers, too) gloss right over it, never stopping to discover the very deep and rich truths in it.

Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned…so also one righteous act resulted in justification and life for all people. (vs. 12, 18b)

Here begins Paul’s extended contrast between Adam, the first man, and Jesus Christ, the “Second Man.”Or, if you please, the contrast is between “two ages.” Adam symbolizes the old age, Jesus Christ the new age. But in dealing with these two ages, we must understand that they are not really datable. It is true that at the death and resurrection of Jesus the new age was begun, in a very real sense we are living in a period of “overlap.” That is, there are those who are living today who remain entrenched in the “old age,” not having claimed Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. That claim is what moves a sinner from the old age to the new age. Every single human being is either in Adam (by birth) or in Christ (by faith). God’s act of justification removes us from the old Adamic order and makes us a “new creation,” part of the new order. So all human beings alive right now are either under the headship of Adam or of Christ.

Technically speaking, verses 12 and 18 are connected, separated by a very long parenthetical thought. Within the parenthesis, thoughts pour out of Paul’s mind like wet cement. For that reason, coming up with any kind of sane outline is difficult. The best way to study this section is to just “let Paul be Paul.” If anything, this part of Romans is an excellent example of “inspiration.” Here we see Paul being carried along by the Holy Spirit, writing what He wanted Paul’s readers to read.

For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. (2 Peter 1:21)

Verse 12. Here is where it all fell apart. Through the act of the first man, Adam, “sin entered the world.” A new concept is introduced: he hamartia, “the sin.” Up till now, Paul has been writing the guilt associated with sin, but now he deals with sin as an outright rebellion against God. The Greek he hamartia refers to “the principle of revolt whereby the human will rises against the divine will.” (Godet) This is the sin that entered the world: willful rebellion against God. The thing is, Adam’s rebellion was not just an act which affected himself alone as an individual; but by his act, he set the course which every human being after him would follow. But how do we know that Adam’s rebellious nature was passed on to all his descendants? Because all his descendants die! Adam’s act of rebellion opened the door for death to enter the world of man. The proof that all men are sinners is that all men will eventually die.

Verse 12 really teaches us three things:

  • Through Adam’s fall, “sin entered the world.”
  • As a consequence, “death came to all men.”
  • This is because “all have sinned.”

But in what sense have “all sinned?” We need to understand this in order to understand the nature of sin. There are three possibilities as to what Paul meant:

  • All men sinned implicitly in Adam. Just as Levi paid tithes to Melchizedek because he was Abraham’s descendant (Hebrews 7), so every human being sinned when Adam sinned because we came from Adam. Since the days of Augustine, this has been a popular view. There is some truth in it; Adam is considered as the representative of the whole human race. The Hebrew word ‘adam, in fact, means “humanity.” But can one be guilty of something they didn’t do? Can I be deemed guilty of Adam’s sin? This seems to be the basic problem of this position—the idea of “inherited guilt.”
  • All men die because they personally sin. Pelagius taught that all men die because the imitate Adam; they follow his example and therefore die because of their personal sins. Even Calvin taught that all of Adam’s descendants are subject to death because we have all sinned. However, this idea seems to contradict the whole idea of the passage, which is that the death of all men rests squarely with Adam, just as the righteousness of all men rests squarely with Jesus.
  • The consequences of Adam’s sin and fall are what was passed on to the whole human race. It wasn’t his bad example or his quilt that was passed on, it was the consequences of death, spiritual and physical. And we might also say that the urge to sin was a further consequence inherited by all men.

It seems that the context of this section of Romans favors the third possibility. It must also be acknowledged that there is grain of truth in each position.

Verses 13, 14. Here begins the great parenthesis. Paul sort of stops in midstream to deal with something that, perhaps, some of his Jewish readers may have struggled with. What about all the people who lived between Adam and Moses? What about the reality of sin before the Law was given? Paul makes it abundantly clear that long before the Law was given, sin was in the world, but then turns right around and seems to contradict himself by saying this:

But sin is not taken into account when there is no law. (vs. 13b)

Paul’s point seems to be is that from Adam to Moses the Law was not yet given and so sin was not present in mankind in the sense of transgression (ie., the breaking of a certain law or code). Men had not been given either the Law by God or instrucions by God, like what was given to Adam to follow. But, the very fact that people were dying from Adam to Moses proved that there was sin present in mankind in some form, for death is the consequence of sin.

Adam is described by Paul as “the pattern as the one to come.” Adam, in other words, is a type of Christ, which may seem odd, given that Adam is so different from Christ. There is, however, one very important similarity between the two. Just as Adam passed on to those he represents what he possessed (the consequences of sin, and to a different degree the urge to sin), so Jesus Christ passes on to those He represents what He possess (righteousness and eternal life).

Verses 15—19. Even though Adam is a type of Christ, Christ is as different from Adam as night is from day. In these verses, Paul shows that the parallel between Adam and Christ is one of contrast, not similarity. The good that came into the world and into every redeemed man through Jesus Christ is vastly superior and far outweighs the evil that entered the world through Adam. This is why Christ’s “free gift” is “not like the trespass.” It is, in fact, far more effective than the trespass.

Notice the power of the words “how much more” as they relate to “grace” and “the gift.” Adam’s sin and its consequences were horrendous, affecting not only each and every human being, but also the nature of the world itself! And yet, Christ’s work produced results that were “much more” significant than those of Adam. Our Lord’s work on the Cross not only effectively neutered the effects of Adam’s transgression, thus putting man back in a state of innocence under probation like Adam had before he sinned, but gave redeemed man much, much more than even Adam ever had. This “free gift” was prompted by God’s grace, and includes things like righteousness and eternal life and the fact that believers will eventually share in God’s kingdom and His glory.

With verses 18 and 19, Christ is considered to have been “the obedient man,” as opposed to Adam, who was the disobedient one. Man is declared to be righteous in Christ because of Christ’s “act of righteousness.” But something important is declared about the state of man: every man stands either condemned in Adam or justified in Christ.

Maybe the best commentary on this section of verses, and verse 18 especially is one Paul wrote himself:

For God has bound all men over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all. (Romans 11:32)

Verse 19 presents a challenge both for translators and interpreters of God’s Word:

For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.

Two questions come to mind: In what sense did Adam’s sin make us sinners? In what sense did Christ’s obedience make us righteous? The Greek is of no help in this. Most scholars agree that we are “made” either sinners or righteous through our relationship to and with Adam or Christ, but we are not “made” so in actuality. “Adam’s sin” simply means that every human being is born into a race that is in a state of rebellion against God. If, however, we side with Christ, we are able to enter into a whole new relationship with God. We are no longer viewed as rebels, but as rebels saved by grace.

Verses 20, 21. Readers of this letter have learned that righteousness is by faith, not by works or the Law. But where does the Law come into play? The Jews understood that they had been given the Law by God with the expectation that it would guide their life and their conduct. But now Paul gives his Jewish readers a blunt explanation of the Law’s purpose:

The law was added so that the trespass might increase. (vs. 20a)

This curious verse may sound like God acted in a nefarious way by giving the Law, but what Paul is teaching is something so simple it’s profound: God gave the Law to make sin even worse. The Law was never intended to save anyone, but to convince the people of their sin and to make them aware of their need for salvation. That’s what the second part the verse says:

But where sin increased, grace increased all the more… (vs. 20b)

When man became aware of how bad off he was, God was able to shed His grace on him like never before. God’s amazing grace far exceeds the extent of sin. Sin is made to stick out like a sore thumb because of the Law.

so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. (vs. 21)

Here is a succinct statement of the purpose of God’s grace: to enable man to triumph over death, just as Jesus Christ did.

Summary. In the first five chapters of Romans, we are taught two great truths: salvation is desperately needed by every human being, Jew and Gentile alike; and salvation is provided by God freely to those who come to Christ by faith. Adam bequeathed to his descendants a sin nature and death. Christ, on the other hand, through grace, provides a new life for believers, deliverance from the sin nature and, as we shall learn more in depth later, a victorious life. Up until we confess Christ as Lord and Savior, we are under the complete dominion of our sin nature and in a constant state of rebellion against God. But when Christ came into our lives, He changed us and enabled us to live according to our new natures. How this incredible victory over sin is achieved, and how we are able to live lives that please God every day will be discussed at length in Romans 6, 7, and 8.

PRIORITIES AND VALUES, Part 4

Developing Godly Character

What is the difference between character and reputation? In the simplest terms, “reputation” is what other people believe you to be, and “character” is what God knows you to be. Your reputation may or may not reflect your character accurately because we are all experts at wearing masks in public. Depending on the mask we put on, we may be seen by people as being humble and easy to get along with, while in the privacy of our home, away from public scrutiny, we may be a tyrant.

Character is a part of our being that is shaped over time, being influenced by many things, like our parents, friends and acquaintances, education, relationships at school, work, and church. All those things and more work together to shape our character.

With so many negative influences around us, it’s frighteningly easy to develop character flaws, and once we have them they are hard to root out and remove. However, Christians are to work at developing a Godly character, no matter how difficult that may be within our culture. Through prayer, self-examination, application of the the Word of God, and a daily reliance on the Holy Spirit, we should be able to polish up the image of God within us and be perfect examples of what Godly character looks like.

Here’s how we do this.

1. Remove yourself from evil influences, Psalm 101:1-8

This psalm, written by King David, is his description of an ideal. It’s how David wanted to rule Israel, and how he wanted it to be ruled by his successors. In that sense it is similar to the book of Proverbs, with its admonitions about kingly conduct.

a. Determine to live righteously, vs. 1-3

The very first thing we notice about how David began his psalm is how often he used the phrase, “I will.” From the outset we sense the king’s determination to live in such a way as to demonstrate his loyalty to God. The motivation for this aspiration comes from David’s appreciation for God’s character; His acts of “love and justice.” The Lord’s treatment of His people, including David himself, brought David to this place of thanksgiving and determination to live right before God.

Kirkpatrick interprets verse 2 this way:

I will give heed unto the way of integrity, deliberately and of set purpose make whole hearted devotion to God and perfect uprightness towards men the rule of my conduct.

David’s absolute determination to live in a righteous manner, though, is balanced by a dependence of God

when will you come to me?

David, Israel’s Godly king, affirms his loyalty to God, not to the ways of the world:

I will set before my eyes no vile thing.

What an important lesson for the modern Christian to learn! Many of us long to live righteously, yet we sabotage our efforts by not approaching this noble goal with grit and determination and by flirting with the world every chance we get. Want to be holy? Then stop dwelling on unholy things! Find it hard muster the strength to live in obedience to God? Be determined, but make allowances for the enabling of the Holy Spirit. God will help you accomplish that which He wants from you.

b. Embrace integrity, reject evil, vs. 4-8

Part of pursuing righteous living and developing a Godly character is the rejection of “the deeds of faithless men.” Moffatt translates verse 4 like this:

Apostates and their practices I hate.

The king has realized how important it is to associate with the right people: people of integrity and honor. So vital was this, later on in the psalm, David makes the bold statement:

I will cut off every evildoer from the city of the Lord.

It’s not that David was better than other people, but “men of perverse heart” influence a man of pure heart negatively. The old saying is never wrong: “One bad apple spoils the whole barrel.” The liar, the proud, and the profane, all wreak havoc wherever they go, be it a family, a church, or some other organization. David wouldn’t tolerate them in his court, and the believer shouldn’t tolerate them in their lives.

2. Let God reshape your heart, Matthew 5:1-12

Matthew 12 begins an extended teaching of Jesus, His Sermon on the Mount. The whole thing takes in chapters 5 to 7 and involves Jesus’ ethical and spiritual teachings for Kingdom living. This is how people will live during the Millennial Kingdom; such living can’t be fully realized here and now. That fact, though, doesn’t render His teachings useless. As followers of Jesus, we are already living in the Kingdom, spiritually speaking, and it is our duty to live according to these teachings as far as it is possible for us to do so in this present world.

a. The context, vs. 1, 2

Jesus begins His discussion on Kingdom living with the Beatitudes, conditions of the heart that lead to the favor of God and the ability to receive certain blessings from Him. These are spiritual attitudes, really, that in most cases are polar opposites to worldly attitudes. But if we are to develop a Godly character, we must begin with a whole new way of thinking: attitude makes the difference!

b. Develop kingdom desires and attitudes, vs. 3-9

The world wants us to live one way, but God demands we live His way, and His way is frequently at odds with the world’s.

(1) God says the “poor in spirit” will be blessed. The world says the exact opposite. One who is “poor is spirit” is one who has realized their spiritual bankruptcy and have come to depend wholly on God. It has no thing to do with wealth or material possessions, although it could. Jesus wants His people to humbly come to depend on Him.

(2) God says that “mourners” will be blessed. Those who are “poor in spirit” are also those who know how to mourn. People mourn for many reasons: sickness, pain, bereavement, wounded pride, etc., but here Jesus has in mind the believer who mourns because they have seen how spiritual needy they really are. The world tells people to feel good about themselves and to practice positive self-esteem. Christians shouldn’t beat themselves up, but they should see themselves as God sees them: redeemed sinners who need a whole lot of help from above to live right!

(3) God says “the meek shall inherit the earth,” the world says be strong and take what is rightfully yours. A “meek” person is not some supine, carpet-like individual who lets everybody walk all over them. Rather, the one who is “meek” is one who is not resentful; who bears no grudge; who keeps no record of wrongs.

(4) God says those who desperately seek “righteousness” will find it. The world tells us to chase material and find emotional fulfillment in earthly things, like money and possessions. Out of the depths of spiritual poverty, mourning over the sin in our life, and focusing on God instead of our hurts, we are free to pursue righteousness; that is, the things of God that build a Godly character. We can’t find righteousness unless we are looking for it. And we won’t be looking for it if we are busy running after the things of this world.

(5) God says if we are “merciful” toward those who are hurting and in misery, then we will be treated with mercy. The world wants us to be selfish and associate only with those who will be of some benefit to us. Who wants to be around a downcast, lonely, hurting person? Jesus does, and so should we, if we want to be like Him. Developing a compassionate, loving, empathetic disposition takes work, but it will result in a divine disposition and you will be an answer to prayer for the one who is hurting.

(6) God says the “pure in heart” will see God. The person who is “pure in heart” is one who is sincere and honest.

(7) God says “peacemakers” are His children. A “peacemaker” is not to be confused with a “peacenik,” who protests all day, carrying some kind of placard, and who seldom showers or shaves. A Biblical peacemaker can only be one who has experienced the peace of God through being completely reconciled to Him.

(8) God says it’s a blessing to be “persecuted” for the sake of righteousness. This kind of persecution is not like be punished for some wrongdoing, but being treated unfairly or unjustly for living a Godly life and being obedient to God’s Word and will.

3. Cooperate with God’s grace, 2 Peter 1:2-11

a. Use God’s resources, vs. 2-4

Notice what Peter says believers have received from God:

To those who through the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ have received a faith as precious as ours.

Faith is the first resource God gives us to live for us. But we have more; faith is merely the beginning. Peter goes on to talk about more resources:

Grace and peace be yours in abundance… (vs. 2)

We can accomplish much more when we are at peace than when we are bound up with frustration and anxiety. Peace sets the mind free and enables us to see things clearly and in perspective.

But these things don’t come into the life of a believer by chance!

through the knowledge of God and of Jesus Christ our Lord. (vs. 2)

It’s not an exaggeration to say that we get many great and precious gifts as part of our new relationship with God in Christ, but those things come into our lives only as the Word of God is given great prominence in our every day thinking. As we read and study it more, we become aware of all that God wants from us, and all that He wants to do for us, if we would just yield our wills to His and let Him have His way with us.

Yes it all begins with faith, but it can’t end there. There is so much more in store for us if we would just do our part.

b. Move ahead in love and toward love, vs. 5-7

Verse 5 really gives us an idea about what is involved in developing a Godly character:

Make every effort to add to your faith…

Yes, it’s an effort to add to your faith all the qualities necessary to have a Godly character. It is our responsibility to supplement our faith with excellent qualities, each one added to the other one. The word “add” means “to supply” or to “super-add.” It’s a compound word, epichorigeo, meaning “to join to, to furnish one thing after another, so that there be no want or chasm.” It’s an odd word used in the Greek arts with the meaning “to lead a chorus.” So Peter wants his readers, and us, to add one thing to another after another in a beautiful order until the chorus is complete and we have developed a character that is in  harmony with that of God.

The whole process of becoming righteous and Godly reaches its completion when on top of every single virtue is added agape love. This kind of love is manifested, not only toward the Body of Christ, or toward our neighbors, but also toward God. When we are living and loving like that, we will have developed Godly character.

(c)  2011 WitzEnd

PRIORITIES AND VALUES, Part 3

Loving Others

“Love your neighbor.” Those words are so easy to say, yet so hard to do. Do you really have to love all your neighbors? Can’t you just love the ones you like? Jesus seems to be making a blanket statement: Christians are supposed to love all their neighbors. But we can’t blame Jesus for inventing such a hard thing to do. The concept of “loving your neighbors” is as old as the Old Testament:

Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the LORD. (Leviticus 19:18)

In all three Synoptic Gospels, Jesus advised His followers to “Love your neighbor.” This is admonition is found in Matthew 22:39; Mark 12:31; and Luke 10:27.

The Hebrew word used in the Leviticus reference means “tenderness and fullness of affection.” For the ancient Hebrews, their challenge was to love other people as God loved Israel. In the Gospels, the word Jesus chose to use is agape. Yes, we are to love our neighbors unconditionally. It seems the more we talk about this, the worse it gets! Let’s discover what it really means to “love others.”

1. Love your neighbor as yourself, Matthew 22:37—40; Romans 13:8—10

a. The biblical social ethic, Matthew 22:37—40

Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” (Matthew 22:37—40)

In answer to a question about which commandment is the greatest, Jesus gave the perfect answer. However, in giving this simple, yet profound answer, Jesus is really teaching us seven things:

  • The entire duty of man, the whole moral-spiritual law is summed up in a single, all encompassing word: love.

  • This love must be directed both up and over: up to God and over toward our fellow man.

  • All parts of man—heart, soul, and mind—must involved in loving God. The heart is the mainspring of all man’s thoughts, words and deeds. The soul refers to the seat of man’s emotions. And the mind has reference to man’s thoughts, his disposition, and his attitudes. What all this means is that man must love God with all of his being; in his thoughts, his attitudes, and his actions.

  • In loving God, man must not hold back. Note the use of the “all.” We cannot love God in a half-hearted manner. We can’t claim to love God with our words but never think good things about Him, for example. We can’t pay lip service to God. Our actions must flow from our confession of love for God.

  • This commandment is called “the greatest” because if flows from our response to God. Because God loved us so much, we ought to feel compelled to as lest aspire to love Him with the same intensity of love.

  • That “second commandment,” says Jesus resembles the first one because it involves love. This time, it is loving a fellow human being, who has been created in God’s image. Our love for him should be motivated out of our love for God.

  • The two-fold admonition (love God, love your neighbor) is the hook upon which the entire Old Testament hangs. Take away that hook, and the Old Testament falls apart.

b. Paul’s expanded statement, Romans 13:8—10

Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law. The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,” and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.

Paul had just commanded submission to ruling authorities as part of the believer’s obligation to live at peace with the world around him. Now he turns to another commandment: love one another.

The underlying thought behind all of Paul’s teaching in this chapter is to live submissively as living sacrifices in light of the fact the Jesus could return at any moment. The very concept of “submission” means doing something you’re rather not do. Loving others does not come naturally to most people; it requires a conscious effort to do so. What’s more (or what’s worse, depending on your temperament!) this admonition to love others is much bigger that merely loving fellow believers! The context favors the broader interpretation of loving all our neighbors, even those who are far outside of the Church.

Loving your neighbor as yourself does not suggest a sick infatuation with self! It’s a way of saying: “Look after your neighbor with the same effort with which you look after yourself.” Paul said roughly the same thing to husbands and wives:

In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. After all, no one ever hated their own body, but they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church… (Ephesians 5:28, 29)

2. Brotherly love described, Romans 12:9—21

The essence of Paul’s teaching in Romans 12 is the dedicated Christian life—a life of sacrifice. It is only when believers are living sacrificially that they are able to live according to God’s will. God’s will is not knowable to those who are not living the dedicated, sacrificial life.

But what does “living sacrificially” look like? It is manifested in a million small ways, in the day-to-day relationships we have with each other. Love of other people, including love of enemies!, is the acid test. If one is loving those around them consistently, they they are in reality a “living sacrifice.”

Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good. Be devoted to one another in love. Honor one another above yourselves. (vs. 9, 10)

The “love” Paul is writing about is the unconditional, selfless kind of love that only Christians are capable of demonstrating: agape. We are to love all people, especially fellow believes, but all people, with agape love. Why? because that’s how God loves us!

In Romans 8:35, Paul asks a pointed question: Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? The answer, of course, is NOBODY. Well, just as nobody and nothing can separate us from the love of Christ, so nothing and nobody should keep believers from loving each other or loving the lost. But this love must be “sincere.” The Greek word means “genuine,” not hypocritical. In other words, Christians should like open books; what you see is what you get. And other people, when they look at us, should see love. But what does agape love look like? It looks like verses 9 to 21, with verse 21 acting as a kind of summary:

Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Christians must do their level best to live like Paul has outlined in verses 9 to 20. The temptation, though, is to meet evil with evil; to hit back and hit back hard. We can’t afford to do that because we are supposed to be “living sacrifices,” meaning since our whole being is dedicated to living for God and living like God, we must always strive act in a way that is usually opposite to our natural inclinations: overcome evil with good. The world’s philosophy is the opposite to God’s; it leads people to treat others as they have been treated. However, to treat other with love when they are expecting something else can sometimes warm the coldest heart!

The foundation of living as sacrifices is that God is ultimately in control of our lives:

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. (Romans 8:28)

If that can be our attitude, then we learning to leave outcomes in God’s hands should be our goal. Learning to let the Holy Spirit control our behavior, especially during times of contention, allows Him to work not only in our lives but also in the lives of others and He will bring about God’s desired result.

3. Brotherly love in action, Romans 14:1—10

Martin Luther once observed:

A Christian in a most free lord of all, subject to none. a Christian is a most dutiful servant of all, subject to all.

In Romans 14, Paul continues talking about living sacrificially in a most practical manner. Apparently thee was a problem in Rome between Gentile and Jewish converts over the matter of food and holy days.

a. Convictions regarding diet, vs. 1—3

Accept the one whose faith is weak, without quarreling over disputable matters. One person’s faith allows them to eat anything, but another, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted them.

This group of verses concerns believers behavior among themselves, not relationships between believers and unbelievers. The real secret behind Paul’s admonition in verse 1 is a simple one: focus on who, not what. When believers get together and their focus wanders away from the center of their faith, Jesus Christ, and settles on peripheral matters, then pretty soon disunity appears. E. Stanley Jones put it succinctly:

Talk about what you believe and you have disunity. Talk about who you believe and you have unity.

The church in Rome had been around long enough to have some minor problems that were threatening to become major problems. Differences of opinion about what believers should eat and what they shouldn’t eat were pretty common in this era and, as we all know, people love to give their opinions and defend their opinions. Paul describes the believer who was obsessed with diet as “one whose faith is weak” because that person’s faith isn’t strong enough to perceive the extent of the freedom he has in Christ. He thoughts, attitudes, and behavior are still governed by somebody else’s rules and regulations. This kind of believer may be doctrinally sound but full of doubt when it comes what he should have for lunch or whether or not he should wear man-made fabric. The advice to stronger, more mature believers is to “accept” this weak believer. This means that strong believers are not to judge the weaker ones, but to wholeheartedly fellowship with them and do nothing to make them feel unwelcome or uncomfortable.

The issues that the Roman church were encountering were non-essentials and therefore not worth fighting over. Issues not involving Biblical doctrines or theology can often, though not always, be deemed “non-essential.” Oddly enough, these inconsequential things, like what to eat, for example, are things that cause the most problems in a church and lead to disunity. This should never be allowed to happen in a local church because unity among believers is how the world knows that Jesus is our Lord and unity among Christians is an attribute that draws unbelievers to Christ.

This was a real “hot button” issue with Paul; one that he fought against his whole ministry. Here was a man gloriously set free from the shackles of legalism, and Paul wanted all believers to experience the freedom he himself experienced in Christ. So convinced was Paul of this, he once had a rough encounter with Peter over it:

When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong. (Galatians 2:11)

So sometimes even great church leaders, like Peter for instance, who may be full of wisdom and spot-on when it comes theology and doctrine, can be completely out in left field when it comes to matters of inconsequence.

b. Holy days, vs. 4—6

What was true of food was also true of holy feast days. Jewish converts still believed in their special days and thought it was important to observe them even though they had become Christians.

Whoever regards one day as special does so to the Lord. Whoever eats meat does so to the Lord, for they give thanks to God; and whoever abstains does so to the Lord and gives thanks to God.

The principle is the same. The church may be full of weak, immature believers, yet genuinely living their faith, but the only person Paul chastises is the one who would look down on or condemn that other person who holds a different view than his own.

c. Be dedicated to the Lord, vs. 7—10

For none of us lives for ourselves alone, and none of us dies for ourselves alone.

The issue of whether or not believers in Rome should eat certain foods or abstain from them seems like one of those mundane issues that can be quickly settled over a cup of coffee. But in this group of verses, as John Stott noted, Paul “lifts up the very mundane question of our mutual relationships in the Christian community to the high theological level of the death, resurrection, and consequent universal lordship of Jesus.”

So, in fact, these mundane issues are very important to the extent that they have the potential of ripping apart a church. If Christ is going to judge every person some day, why should Christians be doing it now?

You, then, why do you judge your brother or sister? Or why do you treat them with contempt? For we will all stand before God’s judgment seat. (vs. 10)

It’s God’s job to judge, not ours. Paul’s observation in verse 7, “none of us lives for ourselves alone” is often thought of in the same sense as John Donne’s famous statement, “No man is an island.” However, that is not what Paul is teaching here. Paul’s point is not a sociological one but a deeply theological one. All Christians live out their lives accountable to God. Decisions about food or holy days should never be made apart from a desire to be faithful to God’s will.

The “weak” or immature Christian needs to stop passing judgment on the other believer who does not share his convictions about disputable matters and the “strong” or mature Christian must stop looking down on his brother who may be clinging to them. Both mature and immature believers will stand before God to give account of how they lived their lives, so let God do the judging.

(c)  2011 WitzEnd

HEBREWS, Part 11

Melchizedek blesses Abraham

A man without beginning of day or end of life

Hebrews 7

As we begin looking at this chapter of Hebrews, we need to understand and appreciate what its author is trying to do. He is building an exegetical and logical position hoping to eliminate any remaining dependence on Judaism that may have existed in is readers. It seems he had decided to convince his Hebrew-Christian readers of three things:

  • The priesthood of Christ is so superior to that of the Jewish religion, that it has replaced it. The old wine skins cannot hold the new wine, in other words. The old way of “doing worship” is finished, having been abandoned by God it must be abandoned by Christians.

  • Jesus Christ in His priesthood established a brand new covenant between God and His people, making the old covenant, with its reliance on ritualism and priestly forms completely obsolete. This new covenant is really a fulfillment of what the old covenant foreshadowed. Therefore, this new covenant is qualitatively superior to the old in every way possible because it is made up of substance, not shadow.

  • The work of Jesus Christ, and indeed His Person, are final and cancel out all other options. Having come to know Jesus Christ, having entered into a person relationship with Him, they could not go back to the old religion.

Many Christians find Hebrews hard to understand because they aren’t Jews; they don’t come from a Jewish background, so much of Hebrews is just so many words. But, while the non-Hebrew Christian does not have to contend with ghosts of his former religion coming back to haunt him, he does have to watch out for other ghosts. Ghosts like religious pride, legalism, compromise, worldliness, and others come back to haunt believers all their lives. Paul contended with this all-too common problem when he wrote a letter to the church in Galatia:

You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified. I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by observing the law, or by believing what you heard? Are you so foolish? After beginning with the Spirit, are you now trying to attain your goal by human effort? (Galatians 3:1—3)

The remainder of Hebrews deals with the living Christ who is currently in Heaven, ministering at the right hand of God the Father. This subject isn’t dealt with much these days. You may hear a lot about the birth, death, and the resurrection of Christ, but it might be helpful if we stopped and considered the living Christ, and what He is doing right now, in Heaven, for us.

The writer to the Hebrews will help us with that, and be begins with a subject he brought up in the last chapter, but will explore much more in depth here in chapter 7: Melchizedek.

1. The order of Melchizedek, 7:1—10

This Melchizedek was king of Salem and priest of God Most High. He met Abraham returning from the defeat of the kings and blessed him, and Abraham gave him a tenth of everything. First, his name means “king of righteousness”; then also, “king of Salem” means “king of peace.” Without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life, like the Son of God he remains a priest forever.

This brings us back to 6:20, which indicates that this man Melchizedek is a type—a foreshadow—of Jesus Christ. In other words, there is something about Melchizedek that should remind us of Jesus. Melchizedek is a key figure in the Bible, yet he is mentioned only in a handful of verses in Genesis 14. In fact, his story is so brief, most Bible readers would be tempted to just forget all about him, except that his name pops up in Psalm 110:4, in reference to the coming Messiah:

You [the Messiah, Christ] are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.”

So, right away, we know that this man, Melchizedek, must be important if Jesus Christ is compared to him. And that’s why he deserves to be studied. The author briefly reviews the facts of Melchizedek as found in Genesis 14:18—20, then gives the reader an interpretation of the identity of this mysterious man.

a. His history, vs. 1—3

As the story goes, Abraham’s nephew, Lot, had moved into Sodom, the wicked city, and become one of its prominent citizens.  When a coalition of kings from the East defeated Sodom, Lot and many other citizens were taken away as captives. Abraham, feeling a sense of responsibility for his nephew, formed an army and went out and conquered those who had defeated Sodom, rescuing Lot and the other captives.

As he returned home from battle, Abraham stopped at Salem, which would later be known as Jerusalem, where he paid tithes to the priest-king of that great city, Melchizedek.

…and [Melchiedek] blessed Abram, saying, “Blessed be Abram by God Most High, Creator of heaven and earth. And blessed be God Most High, who delivered your enemies into your hand.”   Then Abram gave him a tenth of everything. (Genesis 14:19, 20)

Melchizedek was king of Salem, and priest of God Most High (verse 2). Nations outside of Israel combined the two roles—king and priest—into a single office, and single person. The Jews separated the two offices, but this combination of king-priest in one person becomes very important in this section as it relates to Christ.

Like Abraham, Melchizedek worshiped the one true God. It is truly remarkable that these two men, in a sea of heathens and pagans, found each other! Even during these dark times before the establishment of Israel and the giving of the Law, we find true believers. Somehow, Abraham sensed that Melchizedek was his superior, and Melchizedek in turn blessed Abraham in a way which only a greater person could do.

Abraham’s “tithe” was a kind of “thank offering” to God for victory in battle. This offering of a tithe showed the superiority of this Melchizedek and his right to receive it.

“Melchizedek” means “king of righteousness.” We need to note this carefully because, among other reasons, Jews viewed names with great significance; they revealed the nature and character and sometimes the position of a person.

“Salem” was another name for Jerusalem. It comes from the Hebrew word shalom, meaning peace. So Melchizedek was also the “king of peace.” In Ephesians 2:14 Jesus Christ is called “our peace.” So we can see the similarities between earthly Melchizedek and the Son of God: both are known as “kings of righteousness” and “kings of peace!”

Verse 3 gives us even more similarities between Melchizedek and Jesus. He is described as being “without beginning of days or end of life.” This trait of the king of Salem sort of sounds like Jesus, who lives eternally and therefore has en eternal priesthood.

Some Bible readers, based on what is said in verse 3, take Melchizedek to be some kind of divine being—a heavenly creature in his own right. But that can’t be possible; the whole point of Hebrews concerning Melchizedek is to point out that he was a mere human being who bore a resemblance to Christ in a handful of ways. The fact that the Bible gives us absolutely NO information about Melchizedek’s past and future is taken by the author to be inspired: it shows that his birth, death, and genealogy was a type or foreshadow which resembled, in an imperfect way, the eternal priesthood of Christ.

So we can see how Jesus bore similarities to Melchizedek. The question, though, is why did the author feel the need to do this? It was Moses, the man his readers had so much regard for and who wrote Genesis, who declared Melchizedek to be a priest of God, even though he had no formal credentials, no official pedigree, no record of his birth date or even the date of his death. In these things, or in spite of these thing, Melchizedek was still considered, by the great Moses, to be high priest and like the Son of God!

For the Hebrew readers, this would have cinched the argument about Jesus being our great High Priest.

2. The greatness of his priesthood, vs. 4—10

Just think how great he was: Even the patriarch Abraham gave him a tenth of the plunder! (vs. 4)

Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek and this fact demonstrates how great this priest-king was. Consider the greatness of Abraham for a moment. He had been given the ultimate “divine land grant!” To him and his descendants had been given the greatest promise even given to a human being from God. To Abraham, God appeared time and time again to reiterate and re-state His promise. God had the kind relationship with Abraham that He never had with any other human being. Yet this great man, Abraham, acknowledged the superiority of Melchizedek by paying tithes to him.

Now, Jews normally gave tithes to the Levites according to the Law, and the Levitical priesthood owed it existence to Abraham. But Melchizedek was not a Levitical priest, yet still received tithes from father Abraham! Not only that, this priest-king actually blessed the patriarch, further proving how much greater Melchizedek was than Abraham and his descendants, including Levi.

If this is the case, then, the the priesthood of Melchizedek must have been far superior to that of Aaron, since Levi in figure paid tithes to Melchizedek through his forefather, Abraham.

3. The old displaced by the new, vs. 11—22

The Jews believed that their access to God through their Temple worship was the high-water mark of possibilities; that things couldn’t get any better than that. But we read this:

If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? (vs. 11)

Obviously, then, the Levitical priesthood was not perfect; it was, in fact, not the high-water mark of possibilities. Hebrews actually presents Jesus Christ as our great High Priest—the true high water mark; the greatest High Priest who ever lived. However, His genealogy is through the tribe of Judah, a tribe with absolutely no connection to the priesthood. So, then, how could Jesus Christ be considered to be a true High Priest? The answer is crystal clear, especially since the groundwork had just been laid—the discussion about the priesthood of Melchizedek. Jesus was not a typical Lecitical priest, but He is, in fact, part of a more ancient and honorable order of high priests than that of Levi:

For it is clear that our Lord descended from Judah, and in regard to that tribe Moses said nothing about priests. And what we have said is even more clear if another priest like Melchizedek appears, one who has become a priest not on the basis of a regulation as to his ancestry but on the basis of the power of an indestructible life. For it is declared: “You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.” (vs. 14—17)

In other words, the Law gave the Jews their priesthood, but that priesthood was meant to be temporary in duration. It met certain needs among the people of God for a time, but that Levitical priesthood was always meant to be a “stop-gap” measure, proposed by God, until another Priest came along, who, like Melchizedek, had no relationship with Law in regards to the preisthood. And when this great High Priest would eventually come along, the old priesthood would come to it’s predetermined end, replaced by the New Order—the New Covenant.

The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God. (vs. 18, 19)

So the Law did not make anybody perfect in any way, nor could it fulfill God’s purpose for man, but it did serve a purpose: it introduced a better hope. The Law prepared the way for the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The Law forced sinful man to stand away from God, but through Jesus Christ, the “better hope,” we can come boldly into God’s presence.

4. The upshot, vs. 23—27

Now, why is all this “Jewish stuff” so important to Christians? This group of verses, for the most part is why gives this whole discussion of Melchizedek its universal application. Think about what the writer says:

Now there have been many of those priests, since death prevented them from continuing in office; but because Jesus lives forever, he has a permanent priesthood. Therefore he is able to save completely those who come to God through him, because he always lives to intercede for them. (vs. 23—25)

The old priesthood, even though it came from the mind of God, was woefully inadequate to meet the needs of man for all time, therefore it had to be replaced by something much better. Jesus Christ is what makes the New Covenant work. He is more than a man. He is the only One able to save completely those who come to God. Why? Because unlike any earthly priest—or pastor, or spiritual leader, or parent—Jesus Christ will never stop working on your behalf and He will never give up on you because He cannot die. He is alive and will remain so forever and ever!

How shocking all this must have been for the Jews! Bound by rules, rituals, and regulations as they were, this was a whole new way of thinking. No wonder this letter was written. There is always the temptation to wander back into old habits, old attitudes, and old ways of thinking.

Jews and Christians alike should rejoice that both have such a great High Priest, representing them before God the Father in Heaven. Jesus is perfectly suited to that task. In Jesus Christ, God has given His people a great and powerful representative in His very presence. The high priests under the Old Covenant, as good and as effective as they could have been, did not produce godly people, But Jesus’ ministry for us is different; it is completely effective because it is permanent and it does change lives.

We can rejoice and praise God for the ongoing ministry of Jesus Christ. We can find everlasting hope in Christ because He is able to save completely. We are able to cast all our cares—our burdens and our failures—on Christ because He has paid for all our sins.

(c)  2011 WitzEnd

Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 406,942 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 282 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket