Posts Tagged 'Kings'

The Fall of Israel – Halfway in is All the Way Out!

Click to listen to this teaching.

 

A QUICK AND EASY SURVEY OF HEBREW HISTORY

 The Fall of Israel

 2 Kings 17

 Introduction.  The northern kingdom of Israel had a long and troubled history after the division of the united monarchy.  From the moment Jeroboam son of Nebat led the ten tribes away from the House of David, idolatry and political instability were commonplace.  One king after another, we are told, did evil in the eyes of the Lord, and the prophetic warnings of Amos, Hosea, and many other prophets went largely unheeded.  By the time we get to 2 Kings 17, the end has come.  The fall of the capital of the northern kingdom, Samaria, happened in 722 BC and it wasn’t just a political or military disaster; it was the decisive judgment of God upon the people who had systematically rejected His covenant.

Hoshea – Israel’s last king.

Pressure from Assyria, 2 Kings 17:1 – 4.

In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, Hoshea son of Elah became king of Israel in Samaria, and he reigned nine years. [2] He did evil in the eyes of the Lord, but not like the kings of Israel who preceded him. [3] Shalmaneser king of Assyria came up to attack Hoshea, who had been Shalmaneser’s vassal and had paid him tribute. [4] But the king of Assyria discovered that Hoshea was a traitor, for he had sent envoys to So king of Egypt, and he no longer paid tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year. Therefore Shalmaneser seized him and put him in prison.  (2 Kings 17:1 – 4 | TNIV)

Hoshea, son of Elah, came to the throne in a kingdom already under the shadow of Assyria.  The northern kingdom had already been reduced to vassal status under previous rulers.  Tiglath-Pileser III had already carved significant territory and deported many Israelites.  Hoshea 9-year reign was the final chapter.

The text tells us that Hoshea “did evil in the eyes of the Lord, but not like the kings who preceded him.”  That’s pretty faint praise.  He was still an evil king, yet the historian seems to indicate that the open, state-sponsored excesses of earlier rulers such as King Ahab or the later kings of the Jehu dynasty were somewhat restrained.  Whatever the relative degree of wickedness, it made no difference in the end.  Judgment was already determined.

Assyria under Shalmaneser V (and later Sargon II) demanded regular tribute.  Hoshea had paid it for a time, but then he made a fatal political calculation.  He sent messengers to “So, the king of Egypt” (probably Osorkon IV) seeking an alliance that would free him from Assyrian domination.  The move was classic Near Eastern realpolitik:  Play one great power against another.  Well, it failed completely.  Egypt offered no effective help, and the Assyrian king discovered the conspiracy.  Hoshea was arrested and imprisoned.  The last king of Israel never returned to the throne.

This is a recurring pattern in Israel’s history.  Political maneuvering without repentance and trust in the Lord only hastens disaster.  Hoshea tried to secure the nation’s future through foreign alliances rather than through renewed covenant faithfulness.  The result was the opposite of what he intended.

The capital falls, 2 Kings 17:5, 6.

The king of Assyria invaded the entire land, marched against Samaria and laid siege to it for three years. [6] In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Assyria captured Samaria and deported the Israelites to Assyria. He settled them in Halah, in Gozan on the Habor River and in the towns of the Medes.  (2 Kings 17:5, 6 | TNIV)

With King Hoshea in prison, the Assyrian army moved against the capital itself.  Samaria, the fortified hill city founded by King Omri, withstood a three-year siege.  The duration of the siege testifies both to the strength of the city’s defenses and to the determination of the Assyrians.  In the end, the city fell.

The Assyrian policy of deportation was systematic and brutal.  Large numbers of the surviving population were carried away to various parts of the empire – Halah, Gozon on the Habor River, and the towns of the Medes.  The goal was clear:  Break the national identity of conquered peoples by scattering them and resettling foreign populations in their place.  The northern kingdom of Israel ceased to exist as a political entity.  The 10 tribes as a coherent people disappear from history.

The fall of Samaria marks the end of a 200-year experiment in independent northern monarchy.  What began with rebellion against the House of David ended in exile and national extinction.

Why Israel Fell.

The historian doesn’t leave the reasons for the catastrophe to speculation.  He provides a detailed theological diagnosis.

The catalogue of sins, 2 Kings 17:7 – 12.

Israel’s root problem is stated plainly:  They sinned against the Lord their God, the One who had redeemed them from Egypt.  The Exodus is deliberately recalled.  Israel’s identity and obligation rested on that act of deliverance.  To abandon their Redeemer for other gods was covenant treason of the highest order.

The catalogue painfully comprehensive:  They adopted the religious practices of the Canaanite nations the Lord had driven out of the land before them.  They also followed the innovations of their own kings – especially the golden calves of the Jeroboam and the Baal worship introduced under King Ahab.  High places multiplied all over Israel.  Sacred stones and Asherah poles sprang up on every hill and under every green tree.  Incense was burned to foreign deities.  The people en mass did “wicked things that aroused the Lord’s anger.”

Notice the language:

The Israelites secretly did things against the Lord their God that were not right.  (2 Kings 17:9 | NIV)

Idolatry often begins in private compromise and then becomes public and institutionalized.  What starts as a hidden practice ends as a national way of life.

This catalogue is not merely a list of religious offenses.  It is a description of a people who had lost the fear of the Lord.  The first commandment – “You shall have no other gods before me” – had been systematically violated for generations.  The land that was to be holy to the Lord had been filled with rival altars.

Swept away, 2 Kings 17:13 – 18.

God’s patience is obvious.  He didn’t bring sudden destruction without warning.  Through “all his prophets and seers” God called the people to turn from their evil ways and return to the Law.  The prophetic ministry of the 8th century BC – Amos, Hosea, Isaiah, Micah, and others – stands as evidence of God’s long-suffering nature.

Yet the response was always hardness of heart.  The people simply “would not listen.”  They were “stiff-necked.”  They rejected the covenant, the statutes, and the warnings.  The result is described with devastating clarity:  The people followed worthless idols and themselves became worthless.  Those who pursue emptiness become empty.

The list of specific sins intensifies:  The golden calves of Jeroboam, the Asherah pole, worship of the starry hosts, Baal, child sacrifice, divination, and the deliberate selling of themselves to do evil.  None of this was minor deviations from God’s expectations.  Each sin was part of a comprehensive rejection of everything the Lord had commanded.

The people angered the Lord and as a result, He cast them out of His presence.  The language used is covenant language.  He couldn’t look at them; the people who broke His covenant.  The land was the place of God’s special dwelling with His people.  To be thrust out of the land was to be thrust out of the sphere of covenant blessing.  Only Judah was left, and even Judah was already infected with the same practices.

The fall of Israel was not an accident of history or the inevitable result of Assyrian military superiority.  It was the result of the righteous judgment of a holy God upon a people who had exhausted His patience.

Israel’s ongoing idolatry.

The story doesn’t end with the deportation of the Israelites.  The land itself becomes the stage for a new chapter of religious confusion.

Learning to live in the land, 2 Kings 17:24 – 28.

Assyria’s policy of population transfer brought a mixed group of people into the former territory of Israel.  These newcomers didn’t know the Lord, obviously.  When the lions began to attack them, they interpreted the disaster in typical Near Eastern fashion:  The local deity was angry because they didn’t know to worship properly.

The Assyrian king’s solution was pragmatic.  He ordered that one of the captive Israelite priests be sent back to teach the new settlers what the local god requires of them.  A priest from the northern kingdom, trained in the corrupt, compromised religion of Bethel and Dan, returned to instruct the foreigners in the so-called “worship of Yahweh.”

The result was a syncretistic mixture from the very beginning.  The newcomers learned something of the Lord, but they never abandoned their own gods.  The land that had been given to Abraham’s descendants as a place of exclusive devotion to the one true God now became a religious marketplace.

Halfway in is all the way out, 2 Kings 17:29 – 34.

The final picture is sobering.  Each group brought its own deities and set them up in the high places that Israel had already polluted.  The list of foreign gods is given in detail:  Sukkoth, Benoth, Nergal, Ashima, Nibhaz, Tartak, Adrammelek, and Anammelek.  Worst of the all, child sacrifice continued unabated.

They key statement appears twice so the reader doesn’t miss its importance:  “They worshipped the Lord, but they also served their own gods.”  This is the essence of syncretism.  It’s not open atheism or pure paganism.  It’s the attempt to combine the worship of the true God with loyalty to other gods or powers.

The historian’s verdict is clear and final:

To this day they persist in their former practices. They neither worship the Lord nor adhere to the decrees and regulations, the laws and commands that the Lord gave the descendants of Jacob, whom he named Israel.  (2 Kings 17:34 | TNIV)

In other words, partial worship is no true worship.  Halfway in is all the way out.  The God of Israel will not share His glory with rivals.

This mixed population in the former northern kingdom became the Samaritans of later history.  Their religion was a hybrid that the Jews of Judah rightly regarded as compromised.  When the remnant returned to Jerusalem from their Babylonian exile, the tension between the true faith and this syncretistic faith would surface again and again.

Conclusion.  The fall of Israel stands as a permanent warning in the Biblical narrative.  Several powerful truths come to the surface that are worth noting.

First, God’s patience is real, but not infinite.  Generation after generation of prophets called the northern kingdom to repentance.  The people refused to listen.  There comes a point when the Lord simply removes a people from His presence.  That point arrived for Israel in 722 BC.

Second, idolatry is never just a religious preference.  It is covenant betrayal.  Whether the idols are golden calves, Baal, the stars, or the modern equivalents of power, pleasure, security, and self, the result is always the same:  Those who follow worthless things become worthless themselves.

Third, political solutions without spiritual repentance solve nothing.  Hoshea’s appeal to Egypt couldn’t save a nation under divine judgment.  Military strength and diplomatic cleverness are useless when the fundamental problem is sin against a holy God.

Fourth, syncretism is deadly.  The resettled people worshipped the one true God, but they also remained loyal to and served their own gods.  Many in every age attempt the same arrangement.  They want the comfort and respectability of biblical faith while retaining loyalty to other masters.  Scripture declares that such halfway posture is no worship at all.

Finally, the fall of the northern kingdom highlights the faithfulness of God to His Word.  He had warned through Moses that persistent disobedience would end in exile (Deuteronomy 28).  He had spoken through the prophets.  When judgment came, it was exactly what He said it would be.  The same God who judged Israel is the God who later restored a remnant from Judah and who, in the fullness of time, sent His Son to redeem a people from every nation.

The story of Israel’s fall is tragic, but it isn’t the end of the story.  The God who removed the northern tribes from His presence is also the God who, in Christ, brings near those who were afar off.  The call that went unheeded in Samaria still goes out today:  “Turn from your evil ways.  Observe my commands and decrees.”  Those who hear and obey find life.  Those who don’t will discover that the patience of God, though long, has an end.

Three Kings of Israel, the Northern Kingdom

Click to listen to this teaching.

 

 A QUICK AND EASY SURVEY OF HEBREW HISTORY

 The Kings of Israel, the Northern Kingdom

Introduction.  After Solomon’s death, the kingdom of Israel split in two.  Ten tribes in the north rejected the House of David and formed their own nation under Jeroboam, son of Nebat.  The southern kingdom of Judah retained the Temple, the Davidic line of kings, and the capital at Jerusalem.  From that day forward, the northern kingdom – simply called Israel – walked a path marked by instability, idolatry, and eventual total destruction.

The Books of Kings give us a long list of northern kings.  Almost without exception, the verdict is the same for all of them:  “He did evil in the eyes of the Lord.”  Three of those northern kings stand out with special clarity:

  • Jeroboam established the pattern of syncretistic worship that would plague the nation for two hundred years.
  • Ahab took that pattern and plunged it into open Baal worship.
  • Jehu was raised up by God Himself to execute judgment on the House of Ahab – yet even he couldn’t bring himself to abandon the golden calves of Jerusalem.

Together, these three kings show us the tragic trajectory of people who traded the living God for political security, personal power, and cultural/religious compromise.  Their stories still speak with force to every generation that is tempted to do the same.

Jeroboam, the first king of the north.

Insecure leadership, 1 Kings 12:25 – 27.

Then Jeroboam fortified Shechem in the hill country of Ephraim and lived there. From there he went out and built up Peniel. [26] Jeroboam thought to himself, “The kingdom will now likely revert to the house of David. [27] If these people go up to offer sacrifices at the temple of the Lord in Jerusalem, they will again give their allegiance to their lord, Rehoboam king of Judah. They will kill me and return to King Rehoboam.”  (1 Kings 12:25 – 27 | TNIV)

If you’ll recall, God had promised Jeroboam the ten tribes through the prophet Ahijah (1 Kings 11:29 – 39).  The Lord’s generous promise, though, was conditioned on Jeroboam’s obedience.   Jeroboam had every reason  to trust the God who had specifically raised him up.

Instead, he looked at the political realities and panicked.  He fortified cities.  He calculated the risk of pilgrimages to Jerusalem.  He imagined assassination plots.  In short, he measured the future by what he could see rather than by what God had spoken.

Insecurity is a powerful engine of unbelief.  When a leader’s first question is “How do I keep my position?” rather than “How do I honor the Lord?” compromise is almost inevitable.  Jeroboam’s fear was not irrational on a human level – loyalty to Jerusalem could indeed undermine his throne – but it was faithless.  The same God who tore the kingdom from Solomon could preserve it under Jeroboam if Jeroboam stayed faithful to him.

We see this pattern repeatedly in Scripture and in our own hearts.  Abraham feared for his life and passed Sarah off as his sister.  Saul feared the people more than God and kept the best of the Amalekite spoil.  Peter feared the servant girl and denied his Lord.  Insecurity almost always drives us to take matters into our own hands.

Setting up idols, 1 Kings 12:28 – 33.

After seeking advice, the king made two golden calves. He said to the people, “It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem. Here are your gods, Israel, who brought you up out of Egypt.” [29] One he set up in Bethel, and the other in Dan. [30] And this thing became a sin; the people came to worship the one at Bethel and went as far as Dan to worship the other. [31] Jeroboam built shrines on high places and appointed priests from all sorts of people, even though they were not Levites. [32] He instituted a festival on the fifteenth day of the eighth month, like the festival held in Judah, and offered sacrifices on the altar. This he did in Bethel, sacrificing to the calves he had made. And at Bethel he also installed priests at the high places he had made. [33] On the fifteenth day of the eighth month, a month of his own choosing, he offered sacrifices on the altar he had built at Bethel. So he instituted the festival for the Israelites and went up to the altar to make offerings.  (1 Kings 12:28 – 33 | TNIV)

Jeroboam’s solution was brilliant politics but disastrous theology.  He created a convenient alternative religion.  Two golden calves – like the ones at Mount Sinai – were placed at opposite ends of the kingdom so that no one had to travel far.  Non-Levitical priests were appointed so that the religious system would be loyal to the king and not to the Mosaic Law.  A new festival was invented on a date of Jeroboam’s choosing so that the people would not feel the pull of the true feasts in Jerusalem.

Notice the language:  “Here are your gods, Israel, who brought you up out of Egypt.”  Jeroboam didn’t invent a brand-new deity; he claimed to be representing the God of the Exodus.  This is the essence of syncretism.   It keeps the language of faith while emptying it of its content.  These golden calves were not meant to replace Yahweh so much as to make Yahweh manageable, accessible, and politically useful.

The text is very blunt:  “And this thing became a sin.”  From that day forward, every northern king is measured against “the sins of Jeroboam, son of Nebat.”  The calves at Bethel and Dan became the defining idolatry of the northern kingdom until it fell to Assyria.

Jeroboam teaches us that the most dangerous compromises are often the ones that look most practical.  “It’s too much for you to go to Jerusalem.”  Convenience is still one of the most effective evangelists for false worship.  When the true worship of God requires inconvenience, cost, or risk, the temptation is to invent a more use-friendly version is strong.  Churches and individual believers alike need to guard against this impulse to reshape the faith to fit our fears or our preferences.

Ahab, Israel’s worst king.

Ahab’s depravity, 1 Kings 16:29 – 33.

In the thirty-eighth year of Asa king of Judah, Ahab son of Omri became king of Israel, and he reigned in Samaria over Israel twenty-two years. [30] Ahab son of Omri did more evil in the eyes of the Lord than any of those before him. [31] He not only considered it trivial to commit the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat, but he also married Jezebel daughter of Ethbaal king of the Sidonians, and began to serve Baal and worship him. [32] He set up an altar for Baal in the temple of Baal that he built in Samaria. [33] Ahab also made an Asherah pole and did more to arouse the anger of the Lord, the God of Israel, than did all the kings of Israel before him.  (1 Kings 16:29 – 33 | TNIV)

The historian’s evaluation of Ahab is devastating.  Ahab did more evil than all who preceded him.  The sins of Jeroboam – already having catastrophic effects on the people – were treated as trivial.  Ahab moved beyond syncretism into open cultic/occultic polytheism.

The decisive factor was his marriage to the wicked Jezebel, a Sidonian princess and aggressive promoter of Baal worship.  Under her influence, Ahab built a temple for Baal in the capital, erected an altar, and raised an Asherah pole.  Baal, the Canaanite storm god and Asherah, the mother goddess, were given official state sponsorship in the land that rightfully belonged to the Lord.

The northern kingdom had long tolerated the golden calves.  Ahab took the next logical step:  If the God of Israel could be reduced to a pair of golden calves, why not just add the gods of the surrounding nations?  Cultural accommodation became full-blown apostasy.

Leadership always multiplies influence – for good or evil.  Ahab’s personal choices shaped the spiritual climate of an entire nation.  The prophets of Baal multiplied.  The prophets of the Lord were hunted down.  Ordinary Israelites found it easier to blend in with the new religious landscape than to stand against it.

We must never underestimate the power of a leader’s private compromises.  What begins in the palace, eventually reaches the village.

A prophecy of judgment, 1 Kings 21:17 – 29.

 

The immediate occasion for this judgment was the judicial murder of Naboth.  King Ahab wanted Naboth’s vineyard.  Naboth was one of the few righteous men left in Israel, and he refused to sell his ancestral inheritance.  So Queen Jezebel arranged a false witness, a show trial, and an execution.  Ahab got his vineyard.

God sent Elijah with a word of irreversible judgment.  The dynasty would be wiped out.  Jezebel would die a disgraceful, horrible death.  Dogs and birds would consume the bodies of Ahab’s house.  The language deliberately sounds like the earlier judgments against Jeroboam and Baasha.

But something very odd happens.  Ahab tears his clothes, puts on sackcloth, fasts, and humbles himself.  The Lord notices this, and because of Ahab’s temporary humility, the full disaster is postponed until the next generation.

Two truths jump out.  First, God is not mocked and sin has consequences – and those consequences can be far-reaching.  Second, God is astonishingly patient.  Even the most wicked king in Israel’s history received a measure of mercy when he humbled himself.

This episode also reveals the power of a godly prophet.  Elijah didn’t have a political office or military force.  He had the word of the Lord.  That word exposed Ahab’s sin, pronounced judgment, and still left room for a flicker of repentance.  The church today needs men and women who still speak the truth of God without fear or favor, trusting that the word itself carries the power.

Jehu, God’s avenger.

God chooses a king, 2 Kings 9:1 – 10.

Years after the prophecy against Ahab, God raised up the instrument of judgment.  Elisha sent a young prophet to anoint Jehu, a military commander, as the next king of Israel.  The commission was explicit:  Destroy the House of Ahab and avenge the blood of the Lord’s servants.

Jehu was not a reformer in the modern sense.  He was a warrior who was chosen for a specific and very violent ask.  The anointing was private and hurried; the young prophet was told to run.  God’s purposes often move through unexpected people and unconventional means.  Jerhu’s rise reminds us that the Lord isn’t limited to the “nice” and “acceptable” instruments.  He can use a ruthless soldier to accomplish His justice.

Vengeance belongs to God, 2 Kings 10:11, 17 – 31.

Jehu carried out his commission with ruthless efficiency.  The entire house of Ahab was eliminated.  Jezebel died exactly as predicted.  The prophets of Baal were gathered under false pretenses and slaughtered.  The temple of Baal was destroyed and turned into a public toilet – a deliberate act of permanent desecration.

The Lord Himself approved of Jehu’s work.

The Lord said to Jehu, “Because you have done well in accomplishing what is right in my eyes and have done to the house of Ahab all I had in mind to do, your descendants will sit on the throne of Israel to the fourth generation.”  (2 Kings 10:30 | TNIV)

 And yet, the final assessment is sobering and disappointing.  Jehu destroyed Baal worship but left the golden calves standing.  He was zealous for the Lord’s judgment against Ahab, but he wasn’t at all careful to keep the Law of the Lord with all his heart.  Partial obedience is still disobedience.

Jehu shows us the reality of divine judgment and the danger of incomplete repentance.  God will not allow evil to go unpunished forever.  At the same time, the instruments of judgment are themselves accountable.  Zeal for one aspect of God’s will doesn’t excuse neglect of another.

Conclusion.  The northern kingdom of Israel ever recovered from the pattern set by these three kings.  Jeroboam’s calves remained until the bitter end.  Ahab’s Baal worship left scars that even Jehu’s purge couldn’t fully erase.  In 722 BC the Assyrians carried away what was left of the ten tribes into exile and Israel ceased to exist.

What do these stories teach us today?

First, leadership matters.  Insecure leaders create false religions.  Compromising leaders open the door to greater evil.  God-raised leaders may accomplish significant good, but still fall short if their hearts are not full given to the Lord.

Second, idolatry is subtle and progressive.  It begins with practical concerns – “It’s to much for you to go to Jerusalem.”  It always ends with temples to foreign gods.  The church must always examine whether convenience, cultural accommodation, or political advantage has begun to shape our worship.

Third, God is both just and patient.   He judges sin, sometimes through surprising means and instruments.  He also notices even the imperfect humility of a wicked man like Ahab.  His patience is meant to lead to repentance, not presumption.

Fourth, these kings point us beyond themselves to the true King.  Jesus Christ is the opposite of Jeroboam:  Secure in the Father’s love and purpose.  He doesn’t invent alternative ways of approaching God.  He is the opposite of Ahab:  Instead of selling Himself to do evil, He gave Himself to redeem the ungodly.  He is the perfect fulfillment of what Jehu only partially accomplished.  He will one day execute perfect judgment while remaining the perfect embodiment of God’s Law and grace.,

Until that day, the people of God are called to walk in the light of His Word, to reject every golden calf, and to trust the King who never fails.

Panic Podcast: The Everything Bible study, Part 17

A brand new week is here, and on today’s podcast, we will survey the Old Testament historical books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles. I know some of you struggle with these books, but their history is important for all believers to know. There are timeless, divine lessons to be learned from the lives of the kings, prophets, and others mentioned throughout these wonderful books.

 

JOSIAH: Rediscovering the Word

Rediscovering the Word

Looking at the spiritual state of America today, we might have a good idea what the spiritual condition was in Judah by the time Josiah assumed the throne. Judah had forgotten the Word of God. In 2004, the Barna Research Group reported that a mere 4% of American adults have a “biblical worldview.” A “biblical worldview” is a way of viewing the world through the lens of Scripture; a way of life that demands faithfulness to the dictates of Scriptures while living in world that does not. What is disturbing is that the majority of those who identify themselves as “Christian” also do not have a “biblical worldview.” St. Jerome famously wrote:

Ignorance of Scriptures is ignorance of Christ.

The mantra of far too many well-intentioned Christians today is “Christ is all you need,” and while that sounds good, it isn’t. Let’s face it, you can’t know Christ if you don’t know the Scriptures. And ignorance of the Scriptures is not without consequence.

Where there is no revelation, people cast off restraint; but blessed are those who heed wisdom’s instruction. (Proverbs 29:18)

That sounds a lot like modern America! Instead of a passion for right and justice, we have a culture that has “cast off all restraint,” where any kind freakish and abhorrent behavior is now considered “alternative.” There is even confusion among church leaders as to what is right and wrong, in spite of the fact that the Bible has already settled that issue. The consequence of not knowing Scripture! John Wesley once put into words a healthy passion for every Christian to pursue:

O give me that book! At any price give me the Book of God! I have it. Here is knowledge enough for me. Here I am, far from the busy ways of men. I sit down alone; only God is here. In His presence I open, I read His Book.

King Josiah, like King Hezekiah before him, was praised by both the Historian in 2 Kings and the Chronicler in 2 Chronicles. Of Hezekiah, it is written:

Hezekiah trusted in the LORD, the God of Israel. There was no one like him among all the kings of Judah, either before him or after him. (2 Kings 18:5)

Concerning Josiah, though, we read this:

Neither before nor after Josiah was there a king like him who turned to the LORD as he did—with all his heart and with all his soul and with all his strength, in accordance with all the Law of Moses. (23:23)

Hezekiah was known for his trust in God and Josiah was known for his careful attention to knowing and obeying the Word of God. But in between these two godly kings were two extremely wicked and evil kings, Manasseh, son of Hezekiah, and Amon, father of Josiah.

1. A son unlike his father

Josiah was another king who began as a boy-king. Unlike Manasseh, Josiah was surrounded by godly men who were interested in promoting godliness and holiness in Judah. In contrast to his father, Josiah was a good and outstanding king; the last godly king Judah would have. No wonder both records of his reign read like this:

He did what was right in the eyes of the LORD and followed the ways of his father David, not turning aside to the right or to the left. (2 Chronicles 34:2)

In many respects, in addition to being one of the godliest kings of Judah, Josiah was also one of the greatest kings of Judah, instituting the most thorough and far-reaching reforms of Judah’s history. Just how significant were the reforms of Josiah? Thanks to Josiah’s devotion to the Word of God, the Jews that eventually went into exile in Babylon had the Word of God to give them the hope they needed to remain faithful. Thanks to Josiah’s far-sighted commitment to the teachings of the Law, when the exiles returned home after 70 years, they had copies of the Word to guide them in rebuilding the Temple and their lives. Indeed, the influence of Josiah was felt from the Babylonian Captivity, throughout the centuries of rebuilding, through the silent years in between the Old and New Testaments, into the New Testament era and beyond.

1. Discovering God’s Word, 2 Kings 22:1—13

After having endured almost 60 years of utter paganism, it was time for a change.

(a) Repairing the Temple, verse 1—7

The Historian moves at lightening speed to give the most outstanding example of Josiah’s devotion to God—he repaired the Temple when he was 18 years old. According to what the Chronicler wrote, though, this act was preceded by successful attempts to purge the land of idols and idolatry, 2 Chronicles 34:3—7. In summary form, here is what he did:

  • Got rid of the high places, Asherah Poles, and idols;
  • Tore down altars built to honor Baal;
  • Smashed incense altars;
  • Burned the bones of priest on their very own altars;
  • Went in to the ruins of Israel and did the same things!

This man studied the reign of David and emulated him, but it was his devotion to the Word that propelled this young king to move ahead. Once he had rid the land of idols, Josiah turned his full attention to the neglected Temple. He would discover the long neglected Word of God later, but the first thing he did was bring the Temple into shape. Notice that Josiah did not depend on volunteer help to repair the Temple! Skilled workers and artisans were hired and paid a wage to do the work. Nothing was too good for the House of God. The work was done right and the work was done fast because Josiah refused to get bogged down bureaucratic nonsense:

But they need not account for the money entrusted to them, because they are honest in their dealings. (2 Kings 22:7)

The king delegated responsibility and trusted the people who did the work. Unlike the modern idea of leadership, Josiah did not micromanage his people or their work.

(b) The forgotten Torah, verse 8—13

Two people who were leaders in this massive restoration project, Hilkiah, who was the high priest, and Shaphan, the secretary, were responsible for telling the King about their discovery: the found the book of the Law in the rubble of the Temple. In all likelihood, this was the “official” Temple copy of the Law, which had been lost for a long, long time.

In spite of Josiah’s devotion to God, his reaction to reading the Law of God gives us a glimpse into his character:

When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law, he tore his robes. (verse 11)

Why would he tear his robes? It was because it confirmed something he already knew in his heart: his people, his nation, and he himself were far, far from God. The act of tearing one’s robes was an act of contrition; a sign of remorse because of personal and national disobedience to God. The nation of Judah had sinned grievously in rebelling against the commands of the Law, both in its idolatry and its treatment of its citizens. When God’s Word is forgotten, everything in a society suffers!

2. Response to God’s Word, 22:14—23:3

(a) A difficult word, verses 14—28

One of the simple truths this section of the story conveys is that God’s Word is not always cheery and positive! Sometimes it is downright painful:

For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. (Hebrews 4:12)

Josiah’s initial, personal response to hearing the Word was tearing his robe. But he didn’t stay there; he acted on what he heard by trying to find out more. He pursued God by inquiring of Him by going to see the prophetess Huldah. We don’t know why Josiah sent his men to see this godly, respected woman when he could consulted the likes of Jeremiah, Zephaniah and Habakkuk, all of whom were living and ministering in Judah at this time.

Huldah gave a message of good news and bad news to Josiah’s representatives. On the one hand, because Judah’s persistent idolatry and her stubborn refusal to repent and obey the Law God, her fate was already sealed:

This is what the LORD says: I am going to bring disaster on this place and its people—all the curses written in the book that has been read in the presence of the king of Judah. (22:24)

So the message for the nation was definitely bad news; Judah was to reap exactly what she had sown. On the other hand, Josiah was given an upbeat message:

Now I will gather you to your ancestors, and you will be buried in peace. Your eyes will not see all the disaster I am going to bring on this place and on those who live here. (22:28)

Even though history tells us Josiah died in battle, he did not live long enough to see the decimation of his once-great kingdom in the face of Babylon.

(b) A historic reading, 23:1—3

Even though he was promised peace, the word from Huldah gave the king no peace. Despite the gloomy future of Judah, Josiah was now more determined than ever that his people repent and return to God. After calling for a meeting with the elders of the nation, he read to them and to all the people from the newly found scroll, and then he led the nation in a renewal of the covenant:

The king stood by the pillar and renewed the covenant in the presence of the LORD—to follow the LORD and keep his commands, statutes and decrees with all his heart and all his soul, thus confirming the words of the covenant written in this book. Then all the people pledged themselves to the covenant. (verse 3)

Like Moses and Joshua, King Josiah assumed the place of mediator of the covenant between his people and their God. Notice the order of events. First, Josiah read the Word himself and dedicated himself to the covenant. Only after that did he give the people an opportunity to respond. This teaches us something of the nature of Scripture; it is communal. In other words, the Word of God was not and is not for just some; it is not just for church leaders. It is for all people. The Word is for all people because the blessings of God are for all and God desires to enter into a covenant relationship with all people. But all this begins with the Word. Spurgeon remarked,

No promise is of private interpretation. Whatever God has said to any one saint, He has said to all.

The moment the people heard the Word of God and responded, the real work began; the kingdom needed to be rebuilt. It would never be the same.

3. Living according to God’s Word, 2 Kings 23:4—25

There is a distinct pattern in spiritual growth that becomes apparent when we study Hebrew history, especially from the perspective of the Kings. The first step is knowledge, or we might say “information.” Josiah, for example, sprang alive spiritually when he was made aware of aspects of God’s character as disclosed in the Word. The second step is response; that is, people are given a chance to respond to what they have learned about God. Josiah had to respond and his people had to respond. The last step in spiritual growth is action. People must do something with what they now know about God. This is always hard work, and this is where a lot of Christians get stuck.

Here is what Josiah had to do because of what he learned about God.

(a) A spiritual purging, verses 4—20

It seems as though the spiritual reforms Josiah began early in his career continued for some time. This purging of idols and idolatry from Judah was a separate and distinct act from re-establishing the central worship at the Temple. It is one thing to get the faithful to come and worship together, but what about the rest of their lives? What about the ungodly influences? A spiritual leader needs to be concerned about them, and Josiah had proven to be more than just a king.

This purge was nationwide and all encompassing. So complete was this religious clean-up of Judah and the remnants of Israel, that we read this:

The king also desecrated the high places that were east of Jerusalem on the south of the Hill of Corruption—the ones Solomon king of Israel had built for Ashtoreth the vile goddess of the Sidonians, for Chemosh the vile god of Moab, and for Molek the detestable god of the people of Ammon. (verse 13)

Josiah was literally a man of fire! He was so on fire to set things right, he went right back to the very beginning of Israel’s trouble with idolatry; back to the days of Solomon. When God comes in to a person’s life, the only correct response is a complete, unfettered one.

(b) A holy Passover, verses 21—25

Josiah’s approach to spiritual reform wasn’t all negative; he didn’t just destroy evil. He also made sure Passover could be observed as soon as possible. Passover was the most important annual feast of Judah. It served as a reminder of God’s mercy toward His people in delivering them out of slavery into freedom. This feast reminded the people that they were His special possession and that they had a particular calling to fulfill. They were to be different from all other people on the earth. They were to be a light to the nations.

Neither in the days of the judges who led Israel nor in the days of the kings of Israel and the kings of Judah had any such Passover been observed. (verse 22)

Not even Hezekiah’s Passover could match that of Josiah’s.

At the close of the record of Josiah’s reforms, we see that the scope of the king’s reforms went far beyond just abolishing idols and idolatry from Judah and encouraging a return to God. Josiah tackled the occult and occult practices.

Furthermore, Josiah got rid of the mediums and spiritists, the household gods, the idols and all the other detestable things seen in Judah and Jerusalem. This he did to fulfill the requirements of the law written in the book that Hilkiah the priest had discovered in the temple of the LORD. (verse 24)

When the Word of God entered Josiah’s heart, it took over his life. He did not just commit to it half-way. The Word of God was not a convenience to Josiah, it was his passion. And because it was his passion, it was the rule of his life. It guided everything he did and every decision he made. It was his worldview.

(c) 2011 WitzEnd

Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 418,994 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 277 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket