Posts Tagged 'Samaria'

The Fall of Israel – Halfway in is All the Way Out!

Click to listen to this teaching.

 

A QUICK AND EASY SURVEY OF HEBREW HISTORY

 The Fall of Israel

 2 Kings 17

 Introduction.  The northern kingdom of Israel had a long and troubled history after the division of the united monarchy.  From the moment Jeroboam son of Nebat led the ten tribes away from the House of David, idolatry and political instability were commonplace.  One king after another, we are told, did evil in the eyes of the Lord, and the prophetic warnings of Amos, Hosea, and many other prophets went largely unheeded.  By the time we get to 2 Kings 17, the end has come.  The fall of the capital of the northern kingdom, Samaria, happened in 722 BC and it wasn’t just a political or military disaster; it was the decisive judgment of God upon the people who had systematically rejected His covenant.

Hoshea – Israel’s last king.

Pressure from Assyria, 2 Kings 17:1 – 4.

In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, Hoshea son of Elah became king of Israel in Samaria, and he reigned nine years. [2] He did evil in the eyes of the Lord, but not like the kings of Israel who preceded him. [3] Shalmaneser king of Assyria came up to attack Hoshea, who had been Shalmaneser’s vassal and had paid him tribute. [4] But the king of Assyria discovered that Hoshea was a traitor, for he had sent envoys to So king of Egypt, and he no longer paid tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year. Therefore Shalmaneser seized him and put him in prison.  (2 Kings 17:1 – 4 | TNIV)

Hoshea, son of Elah, came to the throne in a kingdom already under the shadow of Assyria.  The northern kingdom had already been reduced to vassal status under previous rulers.  Tiglath-Pileser III had already carved significant territory and deported many Israelites.  Hoshea 9-year reign was the final chapter.

The text tells us that Hoshea “did evil in the eyes of the Lord, but not like the kings who preceded him.”  That’s pretty faint praise.  He was still an evil king, yet the historian seems to indicate that the open, state-sponsored excesses of earlier rulers such as King Ahab or the later kings of the Jehu dynasty were somewhat restrained.  Whatever the relative degree of wickedness, it made no difference in the end.  Judgment was already determined.

Assyria under Shalmaneser V (and later Sargon II) demanded regular tribute.  Hoshea had paid it for a time, but then he made a fatal political calculation.  He sent messengers to “So, the king of Egypt” (probably Osorkon IV) seeking an alliance that would free him from Assyrian domination.  The move was classic Near Eastern realpolitik:  Play one great power against another.  Well, it failed completely.  Egypt offered no effective help, and the Assyrian king discovered the conspiracy.  Hoshea was arrested and imprisoned.  The last king of Israel never returned to the throne.

This is a recurring pattern in Israel’s history.  Political maneuvering without repentance and trust in the Lord only hastens disaster.  Hoshea tried to secure the nation’s future through foreign alliances rather than through renewed covenant faithfulness.  The result was the opposite of what he intended.

The capital falls, 2 Kings 17:5, 6.

The king of Assyria invaded the entire land, marched against Samaria and laid siege to it for three years. [6] In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Assyria captured Samaria and deported the Israelites to Assyria. He settled them in Halah, in Gozan on the Habor River and in the towns of the Medes.  (2 Kings 17:5, 6 | TNIV)

With King Hoshea in prison, the Assyrian army moved against the capital itself.  Samaria, the fortified hill city founded by King Omri, withstood a three-year siege.  The duration of the siege testifies both to the strength of the city’s defenses and to the determination of the Assyrians.  In the end, the city fell.

The Assyrian policy of deportation was systematic and brutal.  Large numbers of the surviving population were carried away to various parts of the empire – Halah, Gozon on the Habor River, and the towns of the Medes.  The goal was clear:  Break the national identity of conquered peoples by scattering them and resettling foreign populations in their place.  The northern kingdom of Israel ceased to exist as a political entity.  The 10 tribes as a coherent people disappear from history.

The fall of Samaria marks the end of a 200-year experiment in independent northern monarchy.  What began with rebellion against the House of David ended in exile and national extinction.

Why Israel Fell.

The historian doesn’t leave the reasons for the catastrophe to speculation.  He provides a detailed theological diagnosis.

The catalogue of sins, 2 Kings 17:7 – 12.

Israel’s root problem is stated plainly:  They sinned against the Lord their God, the One who had redeemed them from Egypt.  The Exodus is deliberately recalled.  Israel’s identity and obligation rested on that act of deliverance.  To abandon their Redeemer for other gods was covenant treason of the highest order.

The catalogue painfully comprehensive:  They adopted the religious practices of the Canaanite nations the Lord had driven out of the land before them.  They also followed the innovations of their own kings – especially the golden calves of the Jeroboam and the Baal worship introduced under King Ahab.  High places multiplied all over Israel.  Sacred stones and Asherah poles sprang up on every hill and under every green tree.  Incense was burned to foreign deities.  The people en mass did “wicked things that aroused the Lord’s anger.”

Notice the language:

The Israelites secretly did things against the Lord their God that were not right.  (2 Kings 17:9 | NIV)

Idolatry often begins in private compromise and then becomes public and institutionalized.  What starts as a hidden practice ends as a national way of life.

This catalogue is not merely a list of religious offenses.  It is a description of a people who had lost the fear of the Lord.  The first commandment – “You shall have no other gods before me” – had been systematically violated for generations.  The land that was to be holy to the Lord had been filled with rival altars.

Swept away, 2 Kings 17:13 – 18.

God’s patience is obvious.  He didn’t bring sudden destruction without warning.  Through “all his prophets and seers” God called the people to turn from their evil ways and return to the Law.  The prophetic ministry of the 8th century BC – Amos, Hosea, Isaiah, Micah, and others – stands as evidence of God’s long-suffering nature.

Yet the response was always hardness of heart.  The people simply “would not listen.”  They were “stiff-necked.”  They rejected the covenant, the statutes, and the warnings.  The result is described with devastating clarity:  The people followed worthless idols and themselves became worthless.  Those who pursue emptiness become empty.

The list of specific sins intensifies:  The golden calves of Jeroboam, the Asherah pole, worship of the starry hosts, Baal, child sacrifice, divination, and the deliberate selling of themselves to do evil.  None of this was minor deviations from God’s expectations.  Each sin was part of a comprehensive rejection of everything the Lord had commanded.

The people angered the Lord and as a result, He cast them out of His presence.  The language used is covenant language.  He couldn’t look at them; the people who broke His covenant.  The land was the place of God’s special dwelling with His people.  To be thrust out of the land was to be thrust out of the sphere of covenant blessing.  Only Judah was left, and even Judah was already infected with the same practices.

The fall of Israel was not an accident of history or the inevitable result of Assyrian military superiority.  It was the result of the righteous judgment of a holy God upon a people who had exhausted His patience.

Israel’s ongoing idolatry.

The story doesn’t end with the deportation of the Israelites.  The land itself becomes the stage for a new chapter of religious confusion.

Learning to live in the land, 2 Kings 17:24 – 28.

Assyria’s policy of population transfer brought a mixed group of people into the former territory of Israel.  These newcomers didn’t know the Lord, obviously.  When the lions began to attack them, they interpreted the disaster in typical Near Eastern fashion:  The local deity was angry because they didn’t know to worship properly.

The Assyrian king’s solution was pragmatic.  He ordered that one of the captive Israelite priests be sent back to teach the new settlers what the local god requires of them.  A priest from the northern kingdom, trained in the corrupt, compromised religion of Bethel and Dan, returned to instruct the foreigners in the so-called “worship of Yahweh.”

The result was a syncretistic mixture from the very beginning.  The newcomers learned something of the Lord, but they never abandoned their own gods.  The land that had been given to Abraham’s descendants as a place of exclusive devotion to the one true God now became a religious marketplace.

Halfway in is all the way out, 2 Kings 17:29 – 34.

The final picture is sobering.  Each group brought its own deities and set them up in the high places that Israel had already polluted.  The list of foreign gods is given in detail:  Sukkoth, Benoth, Nergal, Ashima, Nibhaz, Tartak, Adrammelek, and Anammelek.  Worst of the all, child sacrifice continued unabated.

They key statement appears twice so the reader doesn’t miss its importance:  “They worshipped the Lord, but they also served their own gods.”  This is the essence of syncretism.  It’s not open atheism or pure paganism.  It’s the attempt to combine the worship of the true God with loyalty to other gods or powers.

The historian’s verdict is clear and final:

To this day they persist in their former practices. They neither worship the Lord nor adhere to the decrees and regulations, the laws and commands that the Lord gave the descendants of Jacob, whom he named Israel.  (2 Kings 17:34 | TNIV)

In other words, partial worship is no true worship.  Halfway in is all the way out.  The God of Israel will not share His glory with rivals.

This mixed population in the former northern kingdom became the Samaritans of later history.  Their religion was a hybrid that the Jews of Judah rightly regarded as compromised.  When the remnant returned to Jerusalem from their Babylonian exile, the tension between the true faith and this syncretistic faith would surface again and again.

Conclusion.  The fall of Israel stands as a permanent warning in the Biblical narrative.  Several powerful truths come to the surface that are worth noting.

First, God’s patience is real, but not infinite.  Generation after generation of prophets called the northern kingdom to repentance.  The people refused to listen.  There comes a point when the Lord simply removes a people from His presence.  That point arrived for Israel in 722 BC.

Second, idolatry is never just a religious preference.  It is covenant betrayal.  Whether the idols are golden calves, Baal, the stars, or the modern equivalents of power, pleasure, security, and self, the result is always the same:  Those who follow worthless things become worthless themselves.

Third, political solutions without spiritual repentance solve nothing.  Hoshea’s appeal to Egypt couldn’t save a nation under divine judgment.  Military strength and diplomatic cleverness are useless when the fundamental problem is sin against a holy God.

Fourth, syncretism is deadly.  The resettled people worshipped the one true God, but they also remained loyal to and served their own gods.  Many in every age attempt the same arrangement.  They want the comfort and respectability of biblical faith while retaining loyalty to other masters.  Scripture declares that such halfway posture is no worship at all.

Finally, the fall of the northern kingdom highlights the faithfulness of God to His Word.  He had warned through Moses that persistent disobedience would end in exile (Deuteronomy 28).  He had spoken through the prophets.  When judgment came, it was exactly what He said it would be.  The same God who judged Israel is the God who later restored a remnant from Judah and who, in the fullness of time, sent His Son to redeem a people from every nation.

The story of Israel’s fall is tragic, but it isn’t the end of the story.  The God who removed the northern tribes from His presence is also the God who, in Christ, brings near those who were afar off.  The call that went unheeded in Samaria still goes out today:  “Turn from your evil ways.  Observe my commands and decrees.”  Those who hear and obey find life.  Those who don’t will discover that the patience of God, though long, has an end.

STUDIES IN ACTS, Part 7

Acts 8:1—25

“The Blood of Martyrs is the Seed of the Church”

Sometimes, God has to act through surprisingly harsh circumstances in order to “force” His saints to “get with His program.” It’s human nature to desire security and sometimes predictability. If we have learned anything about God, it’s that God’s idea of “security”  isn’t always the same as ours, and He is nothing if not unpredictable sometimes.

It was always God’s intention that His Gospel should be preached to the whole world. He was not just a God to the Jews; He is the God of all people, everywhere, but it was up to His people to bring that good news to those who had never heard it. Up until the persecution of Stephen, it seemed as though the Christians of Jerusalem were more or less content to remain there. This new faith experienced by so many Jews was closely linked to Judaism, so much so that to the casual observer it might very well have been a mere sect of Judaism. The church had the respect of the city, and with the exception of some of the religious elite, nobody in Jerusalem seemed to have a problem with this new faith.

But the Gospel of Jesus Christ, like a force of nature, must always be moving; proclaimed by His followers to new listeners all the time. In a sense, we might consider the period from Pentecost to the death of Stephen a kind of “transitional period,” where the early church learned how to walk. In the time that followed the coming of the Holy Spirit, the church learned about its faith, saw the power of God made manifest in their midst, was emboldened by the Holy Spirit and each other, learned what the purpose of Christian fellowship was all about, and discovered that the there were different levels of leadership within the Body of Christ. It took followers of Christ some time to see their work as Christ saw it. The martyrdom of Stephen brought their mission into focus the hard way.

1. Good from bad, 8:1—4

Those who had been scattered preached the word wherever they went. (verse 4)

This verse reminds us of an Old Testament verse:

You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives. (Genesis 50:20)

Sometimes it takes a lot of faith to see the hand of God at work in a bad situation! Joseph had that kind of faith, which is why he was able to to make that astonishing proclamation, which is arguably the most poignant and powerful verse in the Old Testament.

It is likely that the religious establishment martyred Stephen, not so much for what he said, but for the implication of what he said. It rocked their world, and being faced with their own irrelevance in the face of what Jesus Christ brought to the world, these men killed Stephen and began a campaign of persecution against the church. Most scholars believe their anger was directed primarily at the Hellenistic or Greek-speaking Jewish-Christians at this time. These believers fled Jerusalem in the face of this persecution, though the apostles remained there to shepherd the many Jewish-Christians who did not feel the need to leave.

Stephen’s death was not in vain; nor was the persecution that followed, for thanks to those awful circumstances, the Gospel was carried far beyond the confines of Jerusalem, in fulfillment of Jesus’ mandate to take it to the whole world. Without Stephen’s martyrdom and subsequent persecution, who knows how long it would have taken the church grow out of Jerusalem?

The driving force behind this persecution of the Jewish-Christians was a young man named Saul. The death of Stephen infuriated him:

But Saul began to destroy the church. Going from house to house, he dragged off both men and women and put them in prison. (verse 3)

The Greek word behind “destroy” is rare and seen only here in the New Testament; it is a violent word and was used to describe the actions of a wild boar tearing up a vineyard. Saul was not content with arresting these Christians in public, he went into their homes and dragged them out. Saul was a busy man prior to his own conversion. Though not a verse in Scripture, this whole incident proves the veracity of William Cowper’s powerful hymn: God moves in a mysterious way!

2. Philip in Samaria, 8:5—8

Philip went down to a city in Samaria and proclaimed the Messiah there. (verse 5)

The Philip who went proclaiming Jesus Christ in Samaria was not Philip the apostle, but Philip, the deacon. Here was a man who was originally ordained to make sure the needy widows of the Jerusalem church got their temporal needs met, yet he was also a powerful evangelist and preacher, who was making sure the Samaritans got their eternal need for salvation met! Any church could use several of these Philips! Even though he was one of the first deacons ever, this mighty man of God has the distinction of being forever known as “the first evangelist” (Acts 21:8).

Technically, nobody ever “went down” to Samaria since it was north of Jerusalem. But in the Jewish mind, one always “went up” to Jerusalem” and “down” to any other place. It makes perfect sense that the first missionary effort would start in a place like Samaria; it was a “halfway house” between Judaism and the Gentile world (MacGregor). Excluded from the Word of God within Judaism, they were not excluded from the Word of God found in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. His Gospel was and is universal in scope; the Word of God is for all people.

Apparently these fine people hung on Philip’s every word, just as the crowd in Jerusalem hung on Peter’s every word when he preached after Pentecost. And just as the apostles performed signs and wonders as they preached, Philip did as well, and he wowed the crowd.

When the crowds heard Philip and saw the signs he performed, they all paid close attention to what he said. (verse 6)

The way this sentence is worded in the Greek, it seems as though Philip kept on preaching and kept on working signs and wonders all the while the people listened to him. Through the preaching of the Gospel and the evidence of divine miracles, many Samaritans came to have faith in Jesus Christ.

Here we see Philip, like Peter and Stephen, exercising the “sign gifts” that were so common in the early church. Not all the early evangelists had them; it appears that only those in places of leadership, like the apostles, were able to work these various signs. These “sign gifts” had their day, and that day is past. After the apostolic age, the “sign gifts” ceased. This is not a denial of the supernatural, nor is it a denial that God is able to heal the sick or free the demon possessed today. When the canon of Scripture was complete and established, the credentials of a genuine minister of God became correct doctrine, not the ability to work “signs and wonders.”

Verse 8 is short but profound:

So there was great joy in that city.

“Joy” is one of the supernatural fruits of the Spirit (see Galatians 5:22), which Christians can’t help but manifest when they first come to know Jesus Christ. Obviously, many Samaritans found Jesus under Philip’s ministry!

3. Simon the Sorcerer, 8:9—13

Satan’s number one goal is to stop the work of the Church of Jesus Christ any way he can. In Jerusalem, the Devil’s opposition to the church came in the forms of deceit (Ananias and Sapphira), the imprisonment of the apostles, the death of Stephen, and finally the persecution of many Jewish-Christians. In Samaria, Satan used a different kind of strategy to hinder the work of Philip and the great move of God. He used a man by the name of Simon, who was known to be a sorcerer in Samaria.

Apparently Simon was very well-known, for we read this:

They followed him because he had amazed them for a long time with his sorcery. (verse 11)

Was Simon a master of sleight of hand? Or was he able to perform genuine magic deeds because he was enabled to do so by Satan? Opinion varies on this. This kind of witchcraft and practice of the black arts posed a real threat to the early church, whether the so-called magic arts were real or merely tricks. Magic arts run contrary to the law of God and are routinely condemned in Scripture.

Simon the sorcerer was a popular figure in and around Samaria, and had an ego to match has talents. But as popular as he was the people, he could in no way compete with the Word of God and with the manifest power of God, so many who followed Simon now followed Jesus Christ. Simon’s response is noted in verse 13:

Simon himself believed and was baptized. And he followed Philip everywhere, astonished by the great signs and miracles he saw.

The inevitable question is raised: Did Simon become a genuine Christian? There are many kinds of beliefs, but only one kind of belief will result in salvation. It is possible to accept and believe many historical facts about Jesus Christ yet not be born again. It is possible to have a great knowledge about all things concerning Jesus Christ yet that does not make Him your Savior. The Samaritans heard the Word of the Lord, placed their faith in Christ and were baptized into the faith. Simon listened, believed many things Philip said, was impressed with the signs and wonders, and was even baptized. That, however, does not mean he was genuinely repentant.

There are many people in the church today like Simon. They have given mental assent to the doctrines of God, have a measure of faith, but have never faced their sins, owned them, confessed them, and repented of them before God. They, like Simon, want a place in the Christian community. However, anybody depending on church membership or the fact that they have been baptized to get them into heaven will be sadly disappointed, just as Simon was.

4. The Samaritan Pentecost, 8:14—17

When the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they sent Peter and John to Samaria. (verse 14)

Why did the apostles feel the need to go to Samaria? Did Philip’s work there need their “stamp of approval?” Did Philip lack the gift of the Holy Spirit? Understanding why this happened the way it did, is as simple as understanding Jesus’ command to the His followers at His Ascension:

But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth. (Acts 1:8)

The growth of the church would be like the ever-widening ripples we see when we throw a stone into the water. It all started in Jerusalem and rippled out from there. The Spirit was poured out on the believers in Jerusalem and the church began to grow in earnest. When it reached Samaria under Philip’s ministry, the apostles came down from Jerusalem to welcome the new believers into the common church. Once there, God bound the Jewish-Christians and the Samaritan-Christians together as one. When the Spirit fell in Samaria, the wall of separation between Jew and Samaritan was broken down. It was vital for the apostles to see this, to be present when the Spirit fell, and it was vital for the Samaritans to have the apostles with them during this momentous event.

This narrative in Acts is significant. It shows, first, that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is an event subsequent to salvation. We know that upon conversion, all believers receive the Holy Spirit, so assuming the Samaritans were genuinely born again, then the Holy Spirit was actually dwelling in them. When the text says that the Samaritans “received the Holy Spirit” when the apostles laid hands on them and prayed, clearly something else is meant. It seems from what follows that “receiving the Holy Spirit” here refers to receiving the “gifts of the Holy Spirit.”  Since Simon saw something after the Spirit fell, it would seem the the new believers began to manifest some of the miraculous gifts of the Spirit. Though tongues is not mentioned, that is one possibility.

Second, why did Philip not lay hands on the new Samaritan believers and baptize them in the Holy Spirit? Why did he wait for the apostles from Jerusalem to do that? The answer is likely that it was necessary to establish the unity of the Church at the very beginning. There was to be only ONE church, not a whole series of independent “movements” or “revivals” all over the land. It had to be clear to all involved that regardless of culture or language, there was only ONE church.

5. Simon’s heart revealed, 8:18—24

When Simon saw that the Spirit was given at the laying on of the apostles’ hands, he offered them money and said, “Give me also this ability so that everyone on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit.” (verses 18, 19)

“Simony” is a word the sprang this this very incident. It means the buying or selling of church offices or authority. Simon’s response to God’s presence and the gifts of the Spirit is truly tragic story. We learn many lessons from this story, not the least of which is that whenever God moves and is at work in people, there are not only genuine responses but also counterfeit ones. Luke indicates that “Simon believed” and that he was “baptized.” These are matters of fact; Luke simply reported the facts. Matters of the heart are not always so easily discerned, but eventually a person’s heart will always be revealed for all to see.

No spiritual blessing can ever be bought, neither with money nor with tears. A gift is given at the discretion of the one giving it. If that person has to be bribed or manipulated into giving it, then it’s not a gift.

Peter’s response is terse:

“May your money perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money! You have no part or share in this ministry, because your heart is not right before God. Repent of this wickedness and pray to the Lord in the hope that he may forgive you for having such a thought in your heart. For I see that you are full of bitterness and captive to sin.” (verses 20—23)

Peter was not pronouncing a curse on Simon, he simply speaking to him with the authority given him by the Spirit, and possibly exercising a gift of the Spirit, like the word of knowledge. Simon was completely unfit for any kind of ministry because his heart was not right. In his rebuke of the sorcerer, Peter actually quotes from Psalm 78:37—

…their hearts were not loyal to him, they were not faithful to his covenant.

The psalmist was recording the unfaithfulness of the rebellious Israelites who died in the desert. Peter was given the ability to see into Simon’s heart, and he saw that Simon had the same problem as those ancient Israelites had. Simon was not serving God, he was serving himself. Obviously, Simon missed the whole point of Philip’s preaching! So Peter gave Simon another chance to get it right by urging him to repent and pray for forgiveness.

There are three interesting points in Peter’s dealing with Simon:

(1) Why did Peter give Simon a second chance but not Ananias and Sapphira? In the case of Ananias and Sapphira, they were Jewish-Christians who professed to know God and were filled with the Holy Spirit. They were genuine believers and had been taught by the apostles. They sinned against the Holy Spirit purposefully; they deceived Him and they tested Him. God took their lives as a measure to keep His church pure, and as a sign that He would not tolerate that kind of behavior from His people.

Simon, on the other hand, was a Samaritan who had a measure of belief but had never confessed faith in Christ. He had not received the Holy Spirit and sinned in ignorance because he was still in bondage to his sin. Simon did not sin against the Holy Spirit, he simply did what all unrepentant people do. Peter was stern with Simon, yet offered him a chance to make things right.

(2) Peter urged Simon to ask God for forgiveness. Notice how Peter phrased this:

Repent of this wickedness and pray to the Lord in the hope that he may forgive you for having such a thought in your heart. (verse 22)

Was there a chance that He wouldn’t forgive Simon? No; God’s forgiveness of anybody’s sins is always conditional on them. A person must be willing to repent. Feeling sorry for your sins is not repenting of them. Being embarrassed that you got found out is not the same thing are repenting. Simon must take responsibility for the sin in his heart, stop trying to buy the gift of the Spirit and he must change the whole course of his life so that it lines up with God’s purpose for him.

(3) Finally, Peter urged Simon not to become bitter in any way. What would Simon have to be bitter about? Peter is actually alluding to various passages in the Old Testament where Moses warned the Israelites not to worship false gods and to avoid bitterness taking root among them (see Deuteronomy 29:18, for example). Moses taught that God could not forgive them of their sins if any of them were bitter.

How does all this relate to Simon? God wanted Simon, as He wants all people, to be free from all kinds of bitterness because when Christians are bitter they stifle the work of God in their lives and in their church. Bitterness is the opposite of joy, and believers are commanded to be joyful.

Did Simon take Peter’s advice to heart? It would seem so, although Luke gives no details beyond this:

Then Simon answered, “Pray to the Lord for me so that nothing you have said may happen to me.” (verse 24)

It’s marvelous how God deals with people on an individual basis; He never deals with two people in exactly the same way.  God created us, and He respects our “bent,” our temperaments and personalities.  He dealt with the Jews one way, the Samaritans another.  He dealt with rebellious Jewish believers one way, and an ignorant Samaritan another way.   But God is ever gracious and His will is always accomplished when we trust Him and submit to Him.

(c)  2011 WitzEnd

Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 418,994 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 277 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket