Posts Tagged 'The Prison Epistles'



The Prison Epistles, Part Four

Colossians 3

In Colossians 2:12 we read these words:

[H]aving been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead.

Paul is describing baptism as dying and rising with Christ. The ethical implications of dying with Christ are discussed in 2:20-23,

Since you died with Christ to the basic principles of this world, why, as though you still belonged to it, do you submit to its rules: “Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch!”? These are all destined to perish with use, because they are based on human commands and teachings. Such regulations indeed have an appearance of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence.

In chapter 3, Paul tells the Colossians what being “raised with” Christ should mean in terms of our moral conduct here and now. This chapter is very typical of one of Paul’s favorite doctrines: the moral conduct of believers is not the means of salvation, but rather the consequence of salvation. It is evidence of a new relationship with God entered into by faith. Our behavior changes, it improves, not because we wish to earn God’s favor, but because we have experienced it.

1. A new frame of reference, 3:1-4

Seeking after things of God should be the lifelong pursuit of every believer. The phrase set your hearts on is a translation of the Greek zeteite, which means to strive for those heavenly things. The believers thoughts, attitudes, ambitions, worldview, and interests should be centered on Jesus Christ. The sense in which believers are to seek is not to discover but to “lay hold of” or “to obtain.” So then, at the very beginning of Paul’s discussion of how we are to live our lives, the very first thing he says is to continually seek heavenly things, striving to grab hold of them.

Verse two seems to be essentially the same as verse one, but there is a very slight difference. Lightfoot observes:

You must not only seek heaven; you must think heaven.

In other words, believers should live with their hearts set on eternal values, not earthly ones. In the natural, human beings cannot do this. But, we are “dead to the world” and “risen to Christ,” therefore, it is possible to live like this. Of course, Paul in no way intends to say that believers are to withdraw from the world; the following verses indicate the exact opposite. However, while we are to have normal relations with the world, Barclay explains:

But there will be a difference: from now on the Christian will see everything in the light and against the background of eternity; they will no longer live as is this world is all that mattered; they will see this world against the background of the large world of eternity.

Verses 3 and 4 give the reader two motives for seeking after and setting their minds on the things above:

First, the believer’s union with Christ in death and in resurrection. Paul implicitly says that if Christians have died with Christ, all that is alien to Him should be alien to them. If Christ is dead to the things of the life, then believers should be also.

But the believer is not only dead in Christ, they are risen with Christ and their lives are “hidden with Christ in God.” This marvelous statement tells us that not only are our lives safe and secure, but that our lives actually belong to God in the heavenly realms (Vaughn). Right now, we experience this spiritually, but one day our relationship will be fully realized. Kelly writes,

The blessed portion of the Christian is that he is dead even to the best things in the world, and alive to the highest things in the presence of God.

The second motivation for seeking after and setting our minds on things above is the prospect our future glory. The “appearing” of Christ refers to His Second Coming, and it is the only time that eschatological reference is made in this Colossians. Differing somewhat from other references of the Second Coming in terms of catastrophic judgment, Paul writes of the Second Coming as a time of manifestation: a revealing of that which is for now hidden. John enlightens us on what Paul is getting at with this verse:

Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is. (1 John 3:2)

Again, Lightfoot offers an interesting take:

The veil which now shrouds your higher life from others, and even partly from yourselves, will be withdrawn. The world which persecutes, despises, ignores now, will then be blinded with the dazzling glory of the revelation.

Believers should live with that reality in their minds.

2. Off with the old habits!, 3:5-11

John Nielson makes this observation on this group of verses:

A mystical theology that has no practical ethical outcome is spurious.

Preaching without application yields few results, so Paul gives his readers some concrete examples on holiness of heart and life. This is typical of the way Paul writes his letters; first he writes about the doctrine then he gives the practicalities of putting that doctrine to work in everyday life.

Since believers have died with Christ, Paul begins, they need to “put to death” or kill their tendencies to sin. He lists a group of five vices, and all but the last one have to do with sexual sins.

  • Sexual immorality. The Greek is porneia, and generally refers to illicit sexual activity, although is came to include all manner of habitual sexual immorality.
  • Impurity, or akatharsia, usually refers to physical impurity, but as it is used here has a moral connotation, including impure thoughts and actions. It is a much more inclusive word that porneia.
  • Lust is how the NIV has translated pathos, which means “feeling” or “experience.” It is generally a passive word which refers to emotions, good or bad. In Greek literature, this word came to denote violent emotions, and in the New Testament it always refers to “uncontrolled desires.”
  • Evil desires is closely related to “lust,” but it a much broader term.
  • Greed. The English word “greed” carried bad connotations, but the Greek term from which it is derived, pleonexian, is a much stronger word and describes one who is so arrogant and ruthless that they assume other people exist only for their benefit. It is taking the idea behind “selfishness” to the highest degree. This attitude is described as idolatry because it puts material things and one’s own comfort in the place of God.

These sins, according to Paul, incur God’s wrath. The apostle goes into great detail about God’s wrath in Romans 1:18-32. This idea of divine wrath is at variance with much of what the Church teaches today. Modern man recoils at the notion of a God who actually punishes one who sins. God’s wrath is linked to His holiness; a holy God cannot be in the presence of sin. This is a cornerstone of Pauline theology and as far as Paul is concerned, avoiding God’s wrath is a good reason to avoid those sins.

Paul also tells his reader to get rid of other sins; sins of the mouth and sins of the mind. Just as before, he lists five of them.

  • The first three terms, anger, rage, malice, are all sins of temperament. They are all committed because we can’t control our tempers and because a general miserable disposition.
  • Slander is rendered “blasphemy” in the KJV, really means insulting and slanderous talk about other people.
  • Filthy language has the idea of being “foul mouthed.”

Finally, Paul tells his Colossian readers to stop lying to each other. The way this phrase is written in the Greek suggests that this was an ongoing problem in this particular church.

3. On with the new habits! 3:12-14

Without these verses, it would seem Christianity is nothing but a negative system of belief. But the reality is Christianity does not involve a long list of restraints and prohibitions; rather it involves imparting a new life that continues to grow and progress. Paul has reminded the Colossians that they “died with Christ,” and after death comes the resurrection: believers have been “raised with Christ.” Being raised with Christ to a new life means the believer needs to “put on” or develop new habits in keeping with their new life. Paul uses the figure of “clothing” ones self with the new habits as one puts on their clothes.

As God’s “chosen people” who are “holy,” believers have been set apart by God, cleansed by the blood of Christ from the guilt of our sins and are being actively delivered, as we grow and mature in the faith, from sin’s pollution, and we are being renewed according to the image of God.

Because of all this, we should be clothed with heavenly virtues, such as those listed by Paul. Among them are:

Compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience. These qualities, if they are present in a congregation, will go a long way in reducing or eliminating factions and friction among the members.

  • Compassion speaks of a kind of pity and tender-heartedness toward those who are suffering and hurting.
  • Kindness, chrestotes, combines several virtues: goodness, kindliness and graciousness (Vaughn). It simply means having a sweet disposition (Ellicott).
  • Humility comes from a Greek word that originally meant to think lowly of yourself because you are so (Ellicott).
  • Gentleness, prautes, is the exact opposite of arrogance and pride. Moule says it pictures a man who is willing to concede to others and put others ahead of himself.
  • Patience, which translates literally as “longsuffering,” suggests restraint or patience under provocation, a withholding of retaliation.
  • Bear with each other, forgive each other. These are the last of the “heavenly garments” Paul says believers should put on. To “bear with each other” suggests an attitude that overlooks or tolerates things in others that may irritate us or things that we dislike in a person. It’s not the idea of not noticing these traits but not allowing them to influence how we treat these people or what we think of them.
  • Lastly, believers are to wear love. The NIV correctly says “over all” as opposed to “above all” because love is pictured as an outer garment, or more a belt, as noted by Eerdman. It covers and unites all the other virtues; it binds them together in perfect harmony.

4. The result of living the new life, 3:15-17

Some see this group of verses as a continuing appeal to have love and concern for others. They see “peace” as peace between the members of the congregation. Others view this section as introducing a new topic: living according to the dictates of a new life in Christ will result in an inner peace. Probably both interpretations are correct. When one is a peace with themselves, they are able to live at peace with others.

This supernatural peace is to “rule” the hearts of believers. The Greek for “rule” is brabeuo, and occurs only here in the New Testament. Originally it meant “to act as umpire.” Scholars debate exactly what sense Paul was intending to convey; perhaps the “peace of Christ” is seen as acting as an umpire, helping the believer as they live their lives in the Body of Christ. A right decision results in peace, a wrong decision results in a lack of inner peace.

Being thankful should be the normative state for anybody who has received grace from God. Literally, the phrase is “become thankful,” and means to cultivate an thankful attitude.

Letting the word of Christ dwell in you means several things. It refers to the teachings of Christ, the Word of God. This must dwell in all believers. The Word of God must have for its home the hearts and minds of individual believers and in the congregation of a church. It is to dwell in us “richly,” meaning in all its power and influence and meaning. Nielson comments:

The Christian must know the Word so well that it remains in the heart and mind, ruling all the actions and presiding over all decisions. That Word is the only basis for teaching and admonishing another.

The punctuation in verse 16 is a little confusing; the most generally accepted way to read it is to link “with all wisdom” to “teach” and “admonish.” Under the leading of the Holy Spirit, believers are to do two things:

  • teach and admonish (counsel) one another using the knowledge of the Word of God;
  • sing with grateful hearts to God using psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs.

On the first point of believers being called to “admonish one another.” In the Body of Christ we are all called to take notice of each other and to watch out for each others spiritual well-being. When we see a brother or sister in danger spiritually, it is our duty to “admonish” or counsel them, not according to church doctrine or our own opinions, but according to what the plain Word of God says. This, naturally, means believers are to know the Word of God.

On the second point, of psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs, William Kelly’s observations are most helpful:

I suppose a psalm was a more stately composition than a spiritual song, which admits more of Christian experience and expression of our feelings. This may be very good in its way and season, but it is not the best or highest thing. A psalm, then, is more solemn; a hymn is a direct address to God and consists of praise.

Finally, with verse 18, Paul reaches the climax of his teaching. Obedience to this one admonition ennobles all life. Not only hymns of praise, but every word and every deed should be an act of worship to God. For the believer, there is no separation between the sacred things and the secular things of life. Everything we do, whether in church or not, is to be done in “the name of the Lord Jesus. This does not mean that we are to use his name as a magic talisman. A “name” is how one is identified, or shows what one is. Whatever we do, however we do it, should be done in trusting in Him, in His power, obeying His will; that is real worship.

The Prison Epistles, Lecture 3

Colossians 2

1. The Pastor’s Heart Revealed, 2:1-5

Paul begins this second chapter of Colossians with a note of concern:

I want you to know how much I am struggling for you and for those at Laodicea, and for all who have not met me personally. (2:1)

Previously, Paul had laid the groundwork for his confrontation with those in the Colossian church who had become embroiled in the emerging heresy. Obviously the Laodicean church was having a similar problem and Paul wrote he was “struggling” for both congregations. The word for “struggling” is the Greek agona, and suggests a wrestling match, strenuous combat between two persons. Of course, Paul is not speaking of physical combat here, but a spiritual one, in prayer. This verse brings to mind another of Paul’s:

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. (Ephesians 6:12)

The reasons for Paul’s spiritual exertion for his congregations are as follows:

  • [T]hat they may be encouraged in heart. William Kelly writes that these people were not happy now, they were oppressed, their were getting clouded in their thoughts. The Greek for “encouraged” comes from parakaleo, “to call to the side of.” It is the root of a more familiar NT word: paraclete, the Holy Spirit. Hendriksen, commenting on this verse, writes: The heart of all true pastoral activity is to be an instrument in God’s hand to bring the hearts of those entrusted to one’s care to the heart of Christ..
  • [U]nited in love. According to Moule, the thought behind “united,” symbibasthentes, denotes being “compacted, welded together.” This is the ideal state for the church to be in, but with the false teaching making its way through the congregation, member was pitted against member and unity was absent.
  • [S]o that they may have the full riches of complete understanding. The strengthening of love between members of a congregation creates the atmosphere where learning and complete understanding can take place. Quarreling and disunity within a church hinders the clear comprehension of the gospel of truth. A person may be a Christian, sing hymns, raise their hands in church, and say all the things Christians are supposed to say, but at the same time be completely in dark about Jesus Christ. The riches of being a believer are not emotional worship services or witnessing signs and wonders; the the riches of the Christian life involve a deeper knowledge of Jesus Christ.
  • [T]hat they may know the mystery of God, namely, Christ. Paul would also write these words concerning the purpose of pastoral ministry:

…to prepare God’s people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ. (Ephesians 4:12, 13)

Believers grow into maturity through a knowledge of Jesus Christ, and that knowledge comes from an understanding of the Word of God. Romans 10:17 says,
[F]aith comes from hearing the message, and the message is heard through the word of Christ.

2. The Pastor’s Ministry Revealed, 2:8-23

In these verses, Paul makes his direct attack against “the Colossian heresy.” One of the unpleasant tasks of the pastor is to admonish members of his congregation when he sees them running into error. The tone of this section is both admonitory and affirmative. His admonitions are built around the supremacy of Christ. Even in his discipline, Paul makes it all about Jesus Christ, not man.

Verse 4 is a kind of prelude to this section and serves to illustrate exactly what had taken place in this church: I tell you this so that no one may deceive you by fine-sounding arguments. The KJV translates this verse:

And this I say, lest any man should beguile you with enticing words.

Notice a couple points. First, evil is potent, and though a church is built up spiritually through the preaching of the Word, it is torn down by words of false teaching. Words are powerful tools for good or evil, and that all depends on what is being preached from the pulpit. Second, the tiny word “lest” or “so that” must not be overlooked. As powerful and destructive a force false teaching may be, it can be resisted. False teaching need not overpower any congregation. It may be resisted as long as that congregation is united in love, brought to maturity through the preaching and teaching of God’s Word.

[a] The Warning, verse 8

As verses 6 and 7 state, it’s not enough to simply “confess Christ,” a believer must be rooted and built up in Him, that is, they must have a firm grasp on fundamental doctrines and not caught up in wild ideas and strange philosophies. It becomes clear that in this group of verses (8-10) Paul is intensely concerned about the false teaching of those in the church whose speculative theories, cleverly presented might undermine the confidence of the Colossians in Christ as their only complete savior.

The exact nature of this errant philosophy is not known, although many speculate. It was an early error that had crept into the church, likely of Jewish origin, that joined itself to Christianity in order to make it’s teachings more palatable and easy to believe. Williams observes, how better to attract Jews and Gentiles to a new religion than to engraft into it some of the teachings of Judaism or of Aristotle or Plato?

Curtis Vaughn calls these false teachers “men-stealers.” The word translated “takes captive” is the Greek sylagogon, which is used of taking captives during war and leading them away as booty. this is a perfect description of false teachers: their goal is to entrap and steal members of the church and drag them into spiritual servitude.

How does this happen? Through a “philosophy” that is “hollow and deceptive.” This is the only time the word “philosophy” appears in the New Testament. Paul is not condemning philosophy in general, merely the destructive philosophy or teaching that is killing the church in Colosse. Paul describes this teaching in three ways:

  • It depends on human tradition. This teaching was taken from the apostles, nor did it belong to the mainstream teachings of Judaism. It was a mixture of Christianity, Judaism, Ceremonialism, Angelolatry, and Ascetism. In other words, man had taken bits and pieces of various religions and combined them with Christianity to come up with a dangerous and deceptive hybrid that so many found appealing.
  • It followed the basic principles of this world. The original term for “basic principles” is taken from the Greek stoicheia, referring to the “ABC’s,” or the elemental teachings of something, in this case, of the world. This passage is fraught with translation difficulties. The term stoicheia came to be used to of the elements of the physical world, things like stars and other heavenly bodies and of elemental spirits. The meaning of this phrase may be “basic principles of this world,” as the NIV reads, or as the RSV reads, “elemental spirits.” Regardless of Paul’s precise meaning, this philosophy is man’s substitute God’s truth as revealed in the Gospel.
  • [R]ather than on Christ. Literally the phrase is “not according to Christ.” If the previous phrase is unclear, this one is clear as crystal: what the heretics are teaching has nothing to do with the truth as revealed by Christ. Christ is the standard by which all doctrine is to be measured.

[b] Christ is the basis of truth because He is God, verse 9

As many commentators have noted, virtually every word in this verse is important, and along with verse 10, crowns Paul’s argument against the false teachers in his letter. Let’s consider the words and their impact:

  • For. This word links this verse and the verses that follow to verse 8, and it shows that Paul’s warning against the false teaching is founded on what he is about to write concerning Christ and His fullness.
  • In Christ. This phrase is placed in the emphatic position within the structure of the sentence which means that in Christ alone the fullness of God dwells. His fullness is not spread across anything or anybody else; it is shared with no angel or man or organization .
  • Lives. Literally the word means “dwells,” and it in the present tense, meaning “now.” This is a powerful thought, for when God the Father placed His fullness in His Son for the Incarnation, it remains in the Son to this day, even while the Son is in His glorified state. The word is katoikei and suggests permanence.
  • Fullness. All English versions translate pleroma that way. It was also used back in 1:19, but here tes theotetos is added to it, “fullness of the Deity.” This is the only time theotetos is used in the New Testament so it’s appearance is significant. It means “the very essence” of God is found in Christ; nothing is lacking. What God is, is found in Christ.

This exalts Christ while decimating the false teachers and their lies. Docetism said that Christ only appeared to be a man. Gnosticism taught that God’s essence was shared among many beings, of which Christ was one. But Paul is teaching that Jesus Christ is God incarnate; that in the Son are to be found all the attributes of God. The Godhead dwells entirely in Jesus Christ! True knowledge is in Christ and Christ is as superior to man as man is to the ants that swirl around a crumb.

Since all the fullness of God is found in Christ, there is no need to look elsewhere for help. So Paul adds immediately:

and you have been given fullness in Christ, who is the head over every power and authority (verse 10).

The thought it is: In Christ, believers have reached the source of all blessing and wisdom and power. If we abide in Him, He abides in us. The fullness of God is within all believers, then. Calvin is helpful on this point:

Ye are made full does not mean that the perfection of Christ is transfused into us, but that there is in Him resources from which we may be filled, that nothing be wanting in us.

A relationship with Christ meets our every need so that we should never need to look to any man or organization to give us what we lack. Possessing Him, we possess all (Vaughn).

The Prison Epistles, Lecture One

Paul’s letters to the Ephesians, Colossians, Philippians and Philemon are referred to the “Prison Epistles” or “Captivity Epistles” because all of them were written while Paul was in prison. On this there is no debate. The debate is over assigning them to the proper imprisonment. Several of Paul’s imprisonments are mentioned in the book of Acts and almost all Bible scholars rule out the idea that Paul wrote any letters from Philippi. This seems to leave the imprisonments at Caesarea and Rome. Guthrie in his New Testament Introduction makes a compelling argument for an Ephesian captivity, a third alternative. After almost four pages, Guthrie concludes that there is not enough evidence to suggest an Ephesian imprisonment, although, as he states,such an imprisonment is not impossible. In other words, from precisely what prison wrote his letters is unknown and open to some conjecture. However, we will deal with this issue further as we approach epistle in turn.

A Study of Philemon

1. Background and Introductory Comments

Paul’s letter to Philemon is so short, merely 25 verses long, that most people don’t even realize it is in the Bible; they pass over it on the way to Hebrews. Yet is a powerful letter, full of meaning. Darby comments:

It is an expression of the love which works by the Spirit within the assembly of God in all the circumstances of the human life.

Being so brief, one has to ask why it is even in the Bible; it is a personal letter, dealing with a personal matter, although it is also addressed to the church that met in Philemon’s home. When Paul wrote it, he likely had no idea that it would find a home in a collection of writings that would become the Scriptures of the Church of Jesus Christ. The occasion that moved Paul to write this letter was his wish to plead with his friend Philemon for a runaway slave by the name of Onesimus.

While Philemon is not mentioned anywhere else in the New Testament, Onesimus is referred to several times, including a mention in Colossians 4:9–

He is coming with Onesimus, our faithful and dear brother, who is one of you. They will tell you everything that is happening here.

So now we know that Onesimus is from Colossae. It is also noteworthy that the five men mentioned who send their greetings to Philemon; Epaphrus, Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, and Luke, are also mentioned at the end of the letter to the Colossians, suggesting that the two letters were written at the same time.

This letter is extremely valuable because in it we get a glimpse of how the apostle Paul’s mind and ministry worked. The man who could write the theologically profound letter to the Romans could also write a deeply personal letter to a good friend, revealing his tact and his special consideration for the well-being and feelings of others, his understanding of human relationships and psychology and, especially, his remarkable capacity for friendship (Rolston).

2. Commentary

[A] Salutation, verses 1-3

Paul, a prisoner of Christ Jesus, and Timothy our brother, To Philemon our dear friend and fellow worker—also to Apphia our sister and Archippus our fellow soldier—and to the church that meets in your home: Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. (TNIV)

In Colossians, Paul refers to himself as a “servant,” but here he writes that he is a “prisoner of Jesus Christ.” Paul is both bound to Christ in faith and commitment, but he is also bound in a Roman prison because of that faith in and commitment to Christ.

The fact that this salutation varies so much from Paul’s other salutations shows that Paul is writing with a distinct purpose and had chosen his words carefully for maximum impact so as to get the right kind of response from Philemon.

Just as in Colossians, young Timothy is by Paul’s side and is included here as one of the letter’s senders. They not only to greet Philemon, the owner of Onesimus, but also his wife Apphia. As the “woman of the house,” she would have had charge over the household help and her opinion in this matter would have been a major consideration as Philemon decided whether or not to receive Paul’s words favorably.

Even though this issue is a personal one between Paul and Philemon, he includes Archippus and the church. Why? Archippus may have been a leading member of the Christian community and pastor of the church that met in Philemon’s house. The early Christian churches often met in large homes; it wasn’t until about the third century that we have records of separate church buildings. Not only could the church bring appropriate pressure to bear on Philemon to make the right decision, but this also shows the interconnectedness of the Body of Christ. Every decision a believer makes can effect their church in a positive or a negative way. If ever a message was important for the church today, this is it. So many of our members have so little regard for their church that they think of it regularly, usually on a Saturday night as they debate whether or not they should go to service on Sunday morning. But here we see the significance and the influence of the church on a member’s life as they are to be included in a personal, seemingly non-church related decision. Really, there is no such thing. We all represent our respective churches in the community.

[b] Thanksgiving and prayer, verse 4-8

I always thank my God as I remember you in my prayers, because I hear about your love for all his people and your faith in the Lord Jesus. I pray that your partnership with us in the faith may be effective in deepening your understanding of every good thing we share for the sake of Christ. Your love has given me great joy and encouragement, because you, brother, have refreshed the hearts of the Lord’s people. (TNIV)

As Gould observed, Paul is a master of psychology. He prepares the ground before he plants the seed (Acts 26:2ff). He notices and commends the good before he applies the words of rebuke or correction.

There is a play on words in the Greek that goes unnoticed in the English. Even though there are a number of people addressed in this letter, it is clear that the comments are directed to Philemon. In verse two, we read the phrase, “in your home.” The “your” is singular, referring to Philemon’s home. Here, in verses 4 to 7, the words “you” and “your” are also in the singular, referring again to Philemon. This is important because we learn something about Philemon. His love for people was legendary, as was his faith in Christ. He was a faithful partner with Paul in the ministry and he demonstrated his love in all he did, both materially and spiritually for the community of faith. Paul’s intent is that he should continue to demonstrate that faith in action in his treatment of his runaway slave, Onesimus. This is the thought that pervades the whole letter, and in the next group of verses is expressed explicitly.

So, Paul’s expression of gratitude for Philemon is combined with a prayer for him. Paul prays that Philemon’s love and his treatment of those in the faith, might continue because that is would be a demonstration of Christian maturity. Love finds it’s roots in actions which bring glory to Christ.

What a pertinent message for the Church of the 21st century, which is full of talk but very little action. What makes a believer mature in grace are actions that are born out of a relationship with Jesus Christ. As we engage in “good works” for Him, that glorify Him, we are filled with knowledge of Him. This is Paul’s prayer for his friend Philemon.

[c] Plea for Onesimus, verses 8-16

Therefore, although in Christ I could be bold and order you to do what you ought to do, 9 yet I prefer to appeal to you on the basis of love. It is as none other than Paul—an old man and now also a prisoner of Christ Jesus—that I appeal to you for my son Onesimus, who became my son while I was in chains. Formerly he was useless to you, but now he has become useful both to you and to me.

I am sending him—who is my very heart—back to you. I would have liked to keep him with me so that he could take your place in helping me while I am in chains for the gospel. But I did not want to do anything without your consent, so that any favor you do would not seem forced but would be voluntary. Perhaps the reason he was separated from you for a little while was that you might have him back forever—no longer as a slave, but better than a slave, as a dear brother. He is very dear to me but even dearer to you, both as a fellow man and as a brother in the Lord. (TNIV)

This is the heart of the letter. Arthur Rupprecht makes the insightful observation that is often overlooked in studies of this letter. Paul’s circumstances are just as significant as those of Onesimus. Because Paul was in prison, he could not do the things a free man could do to help the slave. All he can do is ask his old friend to for clemency for his new-found brother in the Lord, and he can suggest that as soon as he is able, he will visit his friend. Had Paul been free, under the law he could have assumed responsibility of a runaway slave.

Onesimus, for his part, had reached the lowest that one could reach in the ancient world. Being a runaway slave, he had no social status and no protection under the law. This made him subject to all kinds of abuse at the hands of whoever might find him.

Consider the precarious position Paul put his friend Philemon in. In asking for forgiveness and restitution for Onesimus without punishment, Paul is doing something that cut against the cultural grain of his day and stood in defiance of Roman tradition.

Verse 8 reveals Paul’s sense of authority. He uses the Greek parresia, which as it is used here, means “right” or “authority.” Paul is saying, he could literally order Philemon to do something because of his apostolic authority. But he wants Philemon to do this voluntarily from a sense of love, which he knows his friend possesses. There are times when leaders need to command, and other times when the stronger position is to let the followers come to a decision on their own.

In verse 9 Paul refers to himself as an “old man.” Since Paul was a young man at the stoning of Stephen, by now he was probably in his late 50’s or at the latest in his very early 60’s, so he wasn’t that old. The word he used was presbytes, from which we get our word “presbyter.” It means “old age,” but usually has a hint of authority. In antiquity, wisdom and old age were assumed to go along with advanced age. Some versions use the word “ambassador” instead of “old man,” and that is not a bad way to look at Paul.

Finally Paul mentions the subject of his plea, Onesimus. The imagery could not be stronger. Paul calls him his “child,” whose father he has become in his incarceration. This means that Onesimus became a Christian through the witness of Paul and he has grown in his faith to the point where Paul can think of him as his spiritual son, as he wrote of Timothy.

There is a humorous play on words in verse 11. Onesimus was a very common name for slaves. It means “useful” or “profitable.” He who had been “useless” has now become “useful,” finally Onesimus is living up to his name! But there is a secondary play on words that is much more clever. There is another Greek word that means the same things as Onesimus, and it the word chrestos. That in turn sounds a lot like Christ, so much so that the Roman historian Suetonius thought that was Jesus’ name: Useful.

With verse 12, we see how precious Onesimus had become to Paul. If he was so precious to Paul, then he was certainly worthy of consideration and kindness on the part of Philemon. Yet, Paul waits for fully five more verses before making the request of Philemon. He paves the way for the request by saying that he will be sending the slave back a changed person. Onesimus, the once-vagabond slave (Erdman) has become so special to the apostle that sending him away was like losing his right arm! One can only imagine the thoughts running through the minds of both Philemon and his wife as they read those words.

Verse 13 is masterful and is the climax of Paul’s appeal, even before making that appeal. In one single verse, without any fanfare or warning, Paul makes a statement that elevated the slave to the level of the slave owner, and the slave owner to the level of the slave:

I would have liked to keep him with me so that he could take your place in helping me while I am in chains for the gospel. (TNIV)

Paul had just finished praising Philemon for his spiritual maturity and Christian witness, and he declares that Onesimus can take his place. How that must have made Philemon feel. This reminds of a couple of verses:

So the last will be first, and the first will be last. (Matt. 20:16, TNIV)

And Galatians 3:28–

There is neither Jew nor Greek, neither slave nor free, neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. (TNIV)

Some have been critical of Paul for not demanding Philemon to free his slaves. After all, if Philemon was such a super-Christian, surely he shouldn’t want to own slaves! Paul actually does that implicitly. Notice what he says in verses 14-16; Philemon may have Onesimus back “forever,” not as a slave, but “better than a slave”: a brother in the Lord. Erdman writes that earthly friendships become eternal if they are grounded in a common relationship with Jesus Christ. The sense of brotherhood in Christ is what bound Paul to Onesimus to Philemon together in an eternal friendship; none more important than the other.

[d] A Profound Lesson, verses 17-20

So if you consider me a partner, welcome him as you would welcome me. If he has done you any wrong or owes you anything, charge it to me. I, Paul, am writing this with my own hand. I will pay it back—not to mention that you owe me your very self. I do wish, brother, that I may have some benefit from you in the Lord; refresh my heart in Christ. (TNIV)

Not only are Philemon and Paul friends, but they are partners. This is a translation of a Greek word koinonos, which is related to a more familiar word, koinonia, or “fellowship.” As it is used here, it has the idea of being a “business partner.” That is quite a statement to make in regards to a slave! Philemon is to receive Onesimus as he would receive Paul himself, as a friend and as a business partner. Only God can do that; only God put all people on a level playing field!

Given what Onesimus did, this is a remarkable request for Paul to make. First, there is no record of what Onesimus did to make him so valuable to Paul, but it seems as though Paul really didn’t want him to go. Second, Onesimus not only ran away from Philemon, but he stole property from Philemon. Not only must Onesimus repent, which he has done, but there must be restitution. It’s relatively easy to repent, but restitution is another matter all together. The great apostle anticipates this, and makes one of the most prodigious statements in all Scripture:

I, Paul, am writing this with my own hand. I will pay it back… (verse 19a, TNIV)

Paul is not only responsible Onesimus’ salvation, but he has assumed the convert’s guilt and debt. As if to emphasize his seriousness and genuineness, Paul says he wrote this pledge himself, in his own hand, making it not only a pledge, but a promissory note: an IOU. Again, to quote Rupprecht:

Philemon’s spiritual indebtedness to [Paul] should easily cover all of Onesimus’ wrongdoing. Again, Paul’s hint can hardly be missed: “I will repay it. Charge it to the bank of heaven.”

Verse 19 is so deep on so many layers. It shows, first, that no matter how serious we think things on earth are, they pale in the face of eternal values. Whatever loss Philemon may have experienced, it’s relatively unimportant compared to faith. But second, and more importantly, what Paul did for Onesimus reflects the infinitely greater intercession and redemptive act of Christ for us. Gary McSpadden wrote these lyrics many decades ago:

He paid a debt He did not owe;
I owed a debt I could not pay.
I needed someone to wash my sins away;
And now I sing a brand new song “Amazing Grace,”
Christ Jesus paid a debt that I could never pay.

He paid that debt at Calvary,
He cleansed my soul and set me free.
I’m glad that Jesus did all my sins erase:
I now can sing a brand new song “Amazing Grace,”
Christ Jesus paid a debt that I could never pay.

Martin Luther said:

Here we see how Paul laid himself out for poor Onesimus, and with all his means pleaded his cause with his master, and so set himself as if he were Onesimus, and he himself had done no wrong to Philemon. Even as Christ did for us with God the Father, this also did Paul for Onesimus with Philemon. We are all his Onesimi, to my thinking.

[e] Concluding requests, verse 22

And one thing more: Prepare a guest room for me, because I hope to be restored to you in answer to your prayers. (TNIV)

Here we see another glimpse of how Paul worked. In all likelihood, Paul never made it to Colossae. This may well have been one of last things Paul ever wrote. But he fully expected to be welcomed when he arrived, and he fully believed that his friend was praying for him.

3. Concluding Comments

It is obvious after studying these few verses why God thought it was so important they find a place in this collection of inspired writings. First, for many people, the heady theological concept of Christ’s substitutionary and atoning death are difficult to understand. But almost everybody can grasp the ideas of debt and indebtedness. Everybody can appreciate having a friend who can “bail you out” of trouble. And there isn’t a person alive who has never needed somebody to help them out of trouble. This is what Paul did for Onesimus, and it is a human illustration of what Jesus Christ did for us. And secondly, we see here a perfect example of tact; of how to broach a difficult and embarrassing situation where feelings could be hurt.

Does God Supply All Our Needs?

A MiniStudy of Philippians 4:19

And my God will meet all your needs according to his glorious riches in Christ Jesus.

What exactly is this verse saying? Do you think there are some needs God does not meet? Have you ever experienced God’s provision in your life?

This single verse is one that countless Christians have relied on as one of the truly magnificent promises in the whole Bible. But it is merely a “blanket promise?” Or are there “conditions” that need to be met before God honors this promise?

1. A little context

In order to understand the context for this promise, we need go back to verse 10 of this chapter.

I rejoice greatly in the Lord that at last you have renewed your concern for me. Indeed, you have been concerned, but you had no opportunity to show it.

This verse begins Paul’s conclusion to his letter. Other commentators see Paul as showing his “pastor’s heart” with this section. From this verse, we learn that the Apostle received some sort of gift from the congregation at Philippi. He wrote this letter from prison, probably during his first imprisonment in Rome sometime around AD 60. The Philippians had sent Epaphroditus to Paul with a substantial financial gift and with instructions that he should help Paul with his work (2:25).

The congregation at Philippi had heard about Paul’s imprisonment and wanted to do something for him in a tangible way. It seems like it took a long time for them to decide what to do for the Apostle. Perhaps no messenger had been available, perhaps the church leaders couldn’t decided the best course of action to take, or perhaps it took a long time collect the gifts from the church members. Whatever the reason, Paul acknowledges their concern for him and as soon as it was possible, the church got a substantial gift on the way to Rome. The Greek suggests that Paul believed that the Philippians were genuinely concerned and that he understood the gift would have gotten to him sooner if it had been possible. In other words, Paul believed the best about these people.

Verses 11-13 opens Paul’s soul to the reader like no other verses in his epistles.

I am not saying this because I am in need, for I have learned to be content whatever the circumstances. I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty. I have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want. I can do everything through him who gives me strength.

No doubt Paul was impressed with the extremely generous gift and was grateful to the Philippians. His praise of them had been “exuberant” (Hendriksen). To keep this matter in total perspective, Paul makes it clear why he was so excited about the gift. It was not the relief of his need made Paul rejoice. Indeed, to Paul, the ability to be content in every circumstance represented true riches. Over the years of Paul’s ministry travels, Paul had learned to be “content” with whatever God provided him.

The Greek word translated “content” is autarkes and has no English equivalent. In classic Greek literature this word was used of a river running low. Kent has observed that in Stoic philosophy this word described a person who sat back and passively accepted whatever came his way. This Stoic philosophy is unchristian at its core because is suggests that all the resources needed for coping with life are located within man himself. We know Paul never took this attitude. Verse 13 indicates that Paul knew his sufficiency in Christ is what gave him the contentment. It was Christ who continually poured His strength (Greek, dynamis) into the Apostle, and it was the strength that enabled Paul to face whatever circumstances should come his way.

Despite God’s help, we read this in verse 14:

Yet it was good of you to share in my troubles.

Paul doesn’t want to leave the impression with his friends that he considered their gift superfluous and that he didn’t appreciate it. Quite the contrary, in fact. He considered the gift proof that the Philippians were sharing in, not only his work, but also his sufferings.

Not only was Paul thankful for their present gift, verses 15-16 indicate that the same church had consistently supported Paul from the early days of his ministry.

Moreover, as you Philippians know, in the early days of your acquaintance with the gospel, when I set out from Macedonia, not one church shared with me in the matter of giving and receiving, except you only; for even when I was in Thessalonica, you sent me aid again and again when I was in need.

While he was in Thessalonica, Paul had to work to support himself. Thessalonica was a prosperous city, yet Paul apparently received little support during his tenure there. The generosity of the Philippians obviously meant a lot to Paul.

But to Paul, the actual gifts were of secondary importance. He was frequently misquoted and misunderstood and his opponents often distorted and used his statements against him. So, Paul uses financial terms in verses 17 and 18,

Not that I am looking for a gift, but I am looking for what may be credited to your account.I have received full payment and even more; I am amply supplied, now that I have received from Epaphroditus the gifts you sent. They are a fragrant offering, an acceptable sacrifice, pleasing to God.

Literally, verse 17 looks like this: “…not because I seek after the gifts, but I seek after the fruit that abounds to your account.” (Knight). Again, Hendricksen’s obserations are priceless:

The gift was really an investment entered as a credit on the account of the Philippians, an investment which is increasingly paying them rich dividends. These dividends or fruits are the object of Paul’s concern.

What are the fruits of generous giving? Perhaps Paul has in mind things like a clear conscience, an interest in the work of the Gospel, assurance of salvation, increased joy and love for the body of Christ. All of these things are what Paul is wanting the Philippians to enjoy as a result of their generosity toward him and his work.

The best thing Paul can say about the gifts he received from the Philippians is that, even though given to him, they are like a “fragrant offering” and a “sacrifice” to God.

2. Give and it shall be given back, verse 19

That is the context in which we must read verse 19:

And my God will meet all your needs according to his glorious riches in Christ Jesus.

The use of “and” is important. This means that verse 19 is not written in a vacuum, but rather its meaning must be understood in connection with what preceded it. Because the Philippians generously met the needs of Paul, God would in turn meet the Philippian’s needs. This verse brings to mind another, from the teachings of our Lord:

Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. (Luke 6:38)

Continuing the financial metaphor, we would say that the gifts of the Philippians were like a loan to Paul that he could never hope to pay back. But his God (“my God” is a very tender phrase showing how Paul viewed his relationship with God) would make sure their needs would be taken care of as He repays the loan made to Paul, with interest (Lightfoot).

This a perfect example of the law of reaping and sowing. As believers, we reap what we sow. The Philippians’ generosity did not go unnoticed by either Paul or God. And as they looked after a fellow servant in need, so they too would be looked after, but they would be looked after by God Himself.

God would care for the Philippians “according to His riches,” not according to their need. Since His riches are inexhaustible, there is no need that God cannot meet. However, the loving care promised here is predicated on their efforts to meet the needs of another.

Conclusion

So, does God meet all our needs? The answer is a resounding “yes.” However, how much God helps us depends on how much we help others in the Body of Christ.


Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 410,655 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 295 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket