Posts Tagged 'Pastoral Leadership'

The Prison Epistles, Lecture One

Paul’s letters to the Ephesians, Colossians, Philippians and Philemon are referred to the “Prison Epistles” or “Captivity Epistles” because all of them were written while Paul was in prison. On this there is no debate. The debate is over assigning them to the proper imprisonment. Several of Paul’s imprisonments are mentioned in the book of Acts and almost all Bible scholars rule out the idea that Paul wrote any letters from Philippi. This seems to leave the imprisonments at Caesarea and Rome. Guthrie in his New Testament Introduction makes a compelling argument for an Ephesian captivity, a third alternative. After almost four pages, Guthrie concludes that there is not enough evidence to suggest an Ephesian imprisonment, although, as he states,such an imprisonment is not impossible. In other words, from precisely what prison wrote his letters is unknown and open to some conjecture. However, we will deal with this issue further as we approach epistle in turn.

A Study of Philemon

1. Background and Introductory Comments

Paul’s letter to Philemon is so short, merely 25 verses long, that most people don’t even realize it is in the Bible; they pass over it on the way to Hebrews. Yet is a powerful letter, full of meaning. Darby comments:

It is an expression of the love which works by the Spirit within the assembly of God in all the circumstances of the human life.

Being so brief, one has to ask why it is even in the Bible; it is a personal letter, dealing with a personal matter, although it is also addressed to the church that met in Philemon’s home. When Paul wrote it, he likely had no idea that it would find a home in a collection of writings that would become the Scriptures of the Church of Jesus Christ. The occasion that moved Paul to write this letter was his wish to plead with his friend Philemon for a runaway slave by the name of Onesimus.

While Philemon is not mentioned anywhere else in the New Testament, Onesimus is referred to several times, including a mention in Colossians 4:9–

He is coming with Onesimus, our faithful and dear brother, who is one of you. They will tell you everything that is happening here.

So now we know that Onesimus is from Colossae. It is also noteworthy that the five men mentioned who send their greetings to Philemon; Epaphrus, Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, and Luke, are also mentioned at the end of the letter to the Colossians, suggesting that the two letters were written at the same time.

This letter is extremely valuable because in it we get a glimpse of how the apostle Paul’s mind and ministry worked. The man who could write the theologically profound letter to the Romans could also write a deeply personal letter to a good friend, revealing his tact and his special consideration for the well-being and feelings of others, his understanding of human relationships and psychology and, especially, his remarkable capacity for friendship (Rolston).

2. Commentary

[A] Salutation, verses 1-3

Paul, a prisoner of Christ Jesus, and Timothy our brother, To Philemon our dear friend and fellow worker—also to Apphia our sister and Archippus our fellow soldier—and to the church that meets in your home: Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. (TNIV)

In Colossians, Paul refers to himself as a “servant,” but here he writes that he is a “prisoner of Jesus Christ.” Paul is both bound to Christ in faith and commitment, but he is also bound in a Roman prison because of that faith in and commitment to Christ.

The fact that this salutation varies so much from Paul’s other salutations shows that Paul is writing with a distinct purpose and had chosen his words carefully for maximum impact so as to get the right kind of response from Philemon.

Just as in Colossians, young Timothy is by Paul’s side and is included here as one of the letter’s senders. They not only to greet Philemon, the owner of Onesimus, but also his wife Apphia. As the “woman of the house,” she would have had charge over the household help and her opinion in this matter would have been a major consideration as Philemon decided whether or not to receive Paul’s words favorably.

Even though this issue is a personal one between Paul and Philemon, he includes Archippus and the church. Why? Archippus may have been a leading member of the Christian community and pastor of the church that met in Philemon’s house. The early Christian churches often met in large homes; it wasn’t until about the third century that we have records of separate church buildings. Not only could the church bring appropriate pressure to bear on Philemon to make the right decision, but this also shows the interconnectedness of the Body of Christ. Every decision a believer makes can effect their church in a positive or a negative way. If ever a message was important for the church today, this is it. So many of our members have so little regard for their church that they think of it regularly, usually on a Saturday night as they debate whether or not they should go to service on Sunday morning. But here we see the significance and the influence of the church on a member’s life as they are to be included in a personal, seemingly non-church related decision. Really, there is no such thing. We all represent our respective churches in the community.

[b] Thanksgiving and prayer, verse 4-8

I always thank my God as I remember you in my prayers, because I hear about your love for all his people and your faith in the Lord Jesus. I pray that your partnership with us in the faith may be effective in deepening your understanding of every good thing we share for the sake of Christ. Your love has given me great joy and encouragement, because you, brother, have refreshed the hearts of the Lord’s people. (TNIV)

As Gould observed, Paul is a master of psychology. He prepares the ground before he plants the seed (Acts 26:2ff). He notices and commends the good before he applies the words of rebuke or correction.

There is a play on words in the Greek that goes unnoticed in the English. Even though there are a number of people addressed in this letter, it is clear that the comments are directed to Philemon. In verse two, we read the phrase, “in your home.” The “your” is singular, referring to Philemon’s home. Here, in verses 4 to 7, the words “you” and “your” are also in the singular, referring again to Philemon. This is important because we learn something about Philemon. His love for people was legendary, as was his faith in Christ. He was a faithful partner with Paul in the ministry and he demonstrated his love in all he did, both materially and spiritually for the community of faith. Paul’s intent is that he should continue to demonstrate that faith in action in his treatment of his runaway slave, Onesimus. This is the thought that pervades the whole letter, and in the next group of verses is expressed explicitly.

So, Paul’s expression of gratitude for Philemon is combined with a prayer for him. Paul prays that Philemon’s love and his treatment of those in the faith, might continue because that is would be a demonstration of Christian maturity. Love finds it’s roots in actions which bring glory to Christ.

What a pertinent message for the Church of the 21st century, which is full of talk but very little action. What makes a believer mature in grace are actions that are born out of a relationship with Jesus Christ. As we engage in “good works” for Him, that glorify Him, we are filled with knowledge of Him. This is Paul’s prayer for his friend Philemon.

[c] Plea for Onesimus, verses 8-16

Therefore, although in Christ I could be bold and order you to do what you ought to do, 9 yet I prefer to appeal to you on the basis of love. It is as none other than Paul—an old man and now also a prisoner of Christ Jesus—that I appeal to you for my son Onesimus, who became my son while I was in chains. Formerly he was useless to you, but now he has become useful both to you and to me.

I am sending him—who is my very heart—back to you. I would have liked to keep him with me so that he could take your place in helping me while I am in chains for the gospel. But I did not want to do anything without your consent, so that any favor you do would not seem forced but would be voluntary. Perhaps the reason he was separated from you for a little while was that you might have him back forever—no longer as a slave, but better than a slave, as a dear brother. He is very dear to me but even dearer to you, both as a fellow man and as a brother in the Lord. (TNIV)

This is the heart of the letter. Arthur Rupprecht makes the insightful observation that is often overlooked in studies of this letter. Paul’s circumstances are just as significant as those of Onesimus. Because Paul was in prison, he could not do the things a free man could do to help the slave. All he can do is ask his old friend to for clemency for his new-found brother in the Lord, and he can suggest that as soon as he is able, he will visit his friend. Had Paul been free, under the law he could have assumed responsibility of a runaway slave.

Onesimus, for his part, had reached the lowest that one could reach in the ancient world. Being a runaway slave, he had no social status and no protection under the law. This made him subject to all kinds of abuse at the hands of whoever might find him.

Consider the precarious position Paul put his friend Philemon in. In asking for forgiveness and restitution for Onesimus without punishment, Paul is doing something that cut against the cultural grain of his day and stood in defiance of Roman tradition.

Verse 8 reveals Paul’s sense of authority. He uses the Greek parresia, which as it is used here, means “right” or “authority.” Paul is saying, he could literally order Philemon to do something because of his apostolic authority. But he wants Philemon to do this voluntarily from a sense of love, which he knows his friend possesses. There are times when leaders need to command, and other times when the stronger position is to let the followers come to a decision on their own.

In verse 9 Paul refers to himself as an “old man.” Since Paul was a young man at the stoning of Stephen, by now he was probably in his late 50’s or at the latest in his very early 60’s, so he wasn’t that old. The word he used was presbytes, from which we get our word “presbyter.” It means “old age,” but usually has a hint of authority. In antiquity, wisdom and old age were assumed to go along with advanced age. Some versions use the word “ambassador” instead of “old man,” and that is not a bad way to look at Paul.

Finally Paul mentions the subject of his plea, Onesimus. The imagery could not be stronger. Paul calls him his “child,” whose father he has become in his incarceration. This means that Onesimus became a Christian through the witness of Paul and he has grown in his faith to the point where Paul can think of him as his spiritual son, as he wrote of Timothy.

There is a humorous play on words in verse 11. Onesimus was a very common name for slaves. It means “useful” or “profitable.” He who had been “useless” has now become “useful,” finally Onesimus is living up to his name! But there is a secondary play on words that is much more clever. There is another Greek word that means the same things as Onesimus, and it the word chrestos. That in turn sounds a lot like Christ, so much so that the Roman historian Suetonius thought that was Jesus’ name: Useful.

With verse 12, we see how precious Onesimus had become to Paul. If he was so precious to Paul, then he was certainly worthy of consideration and kindness on the part of Philemon. Yet, Paul waits for fully five more verses before making the request of Philemon. He paves the way for the request by saying that he will be sending the slave back a changed person. Onesimus, the once-vagabond slave (Erdman) has become so special to the apostle that sending him away was like losing his right arm! One can only imagine the thoughts running through the minds of both Philemon and his wife as they read those words.

Verse 13 is masterful and is the climax of Paul’s appeal, even before making that appeal. In one single verse, without any fanfare or warning, Paul makes a statement that elevated the slave to the level of the slave owner, and the slave owner to the level of the slave:

I would have liked to keep him with me so that he could take your place in helping me while I am in chains for the gospel. (TNIV)

Paul had just finished praising Philemon for his spiritual maturity and Christian witness, and he declares that Onesimus can take his place. How that must have made Philemon feel. This reminds of a couple of verses:

So the last will be first, and the first will be last. (Matt. 20:16, TNIV)

And Galatians 3:28–

There is neither Jew nor Greek, neither slave nor free, neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. (TNIV)

Some have been critical of Paul for not demanding Philemon to free his slaves. After all, if Philemon was such a super-Christian, surely he shouldn’t want to own slaves! Paul actually does that implicitly. Notice what he says in verses 14-16; Philemon may have Onesimus back “forever,” not as a slave, but “better than a slave”: a brother in the Lord. Erdman writes that earthly friendships become eternal if they are grounded in a common relationship with Jesus Christ. The sense of brotherhood in Christ is what bound Paul to Onesimus to Philemon together in an eternal friendship; none more important than the other.

[d] A Profound Lesson, verses 17-20

So if you consider me a partner, welcome him as you would welcome me. If he has done you any wrong or owes you anything, charge it to me. I, Paul, am writing this with my own hand. I will pay it back—not to mention that you owe me your very self. I do wish, brother, that I may have some benefit from you in the Lord; refresh my heart in Christ. (TNIV)

Not only are Philemon and Paul friends, but they are partners. This is a translation of a Greek word koinonos, which is related to a more familiar word, koinonia, or “fellowship.” As it is used here, it has the idea of being a “business partner.” That is quite a statement to make in regards to a slave! Philemon is to receive Onesimus as he would receive Paul himself, as a friend and as a business partner. Only God can do that; only God put all people on a level playing field!

Given what Onesimus did, this is a remarkable request for Paul to make. First, there is no record of what Onesimus did to make him so valuable to Paul, but it seems as though Paul really didn’t want him to go. Second, Onesimus not only ran away from Philemon, but he stole property from Philemon. Not only must Onesimus repent, which he has done, but there must be restitution. It’s relatively easy to repent, but restitution is another matter all together. The great apostle anticipates this, and makes one of the most prodigious statements in all Scripture:

I, Paul, am writing this with my own hand. I will pay it back… (verse 19a, TNIV)

Paul is not only responsible Onesimus’ salvation, but he has assumed the convert’s guilt and debt. As if to emphasize his seriousness and genuineness, Paul says he wrote this pledge himself, in his own hand, making it not only a pledge, but a promissory note: an IOU. Again, to quote Rupprecht:

Philemon’s spiritual indebtedness to [Paul] should easily cover all of Onesimus’ wrongdoing. Again, Paul’s hint can hardly be missed: “I will repay it. Charge it to the bank of heaven.”

Verse 19 is so deep on so many layers. It shows, first, that no matter how serious we think things on earth are, they pale in the face of eternal values. Whatever loss Philemon may have experienced, it’s relatively unimportant compared to faith. But second, and more importantly, what Paul did for Onesimus reflects the infinitely greater intercession and redemptive act of Christ for us. Gary McSpadden wrote these lyrics many decades ago:

He paid a debt He did not owe;
I owed a debt I could not pay.
I needed someone to wash my sins away;
And now I sing a brand new song “Amazing Grace,”
Christ Jesus paid a debt that I could never pay.

He paid that debt at Calvary,
He cleansed my soul and set me free.
I’m glad that Jesus did all my sins erase:
I now can sing a brand new song “Amazing Grace,”
Christ Jesus paid a debt that I could never pay.

Martin Luther said:

Here we see how Paul laid himself out for poor Onesimus, and with all his means pleaded his cause with his master, and so set himself as if he were Onesimus, and he himself had done no wrong to Philemon. Even as Christ did for us with God the Father, this also did Paul for Onesimus with Philemon. We are all his Onesimi, to my thinking.

[e] Concluding requests, verse 22

And one thing more: Prepare a guest room for me, because I hope to be restored to you in answer to your prayers. (TNIV)

Here we see another glimpse of how Paul worked. In all likelihood, Paul never made it to Colossae. This may well have been one of last things Paul ever wrote. But he fully expected to be welcomed when he arrived, and he fully believed that his friend was praying for him.

3. Concluding Comments

It is obvious after studying these few verses why God thought it was so important they find a place in this collection of inspired writings. First, for many people, the heady theological concept of Christ’s substitutionary and atoning death are difficult to understand. But almost everybody can grasp the ideas of debt and indebtedness. Everybody can appreciate having a friend who can “bail you out” of trouble. And there isn’t a person alive who has never needed somebody to help them out of trouble. This is what Paul did for Onesimus, and it is a human illustration of what Jesus Christ did for us. And secondly, we see here a perfect example of tact; of how to broach a difficult and embarrassing situation where feelings could be hurt.

Structure For Success, Part Two

A Study of 2 Timothy 2:14-26

Keep reminding them of these things. Warn them before God against quarreling about words; it is of no value, and only ruins those who listen. Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. Avoid godless chatter, because those who indulge in it will become more and more ungodly. Their teaching will spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, who have wandered away from the truth. They say that the resurrection has already taken place, and they destroy the faith of some. Nevertheless, God’s solid foundation stands firm, sealed with this inscription: “The Lord knows those who are his,” and, “Everyone who confesses the name of the Lord must turn away from wickedness.”

In a large house there are articles not only of gold and silver, but also of wood and clay; some are for noble purposes and some for ignoble. If a man cleanses himself from the latter, he will be an instrument for noble purposes, made holy, useful to the Master and prepared to do any good work.

Flee the evil desires of youth, and pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace, along with those who call on the Lord out of a pure heart. Don’t have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels. And the Lord’s servant must not quarrel; instead, he must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful. Those who oppose him he must gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth, and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will.

The recent General Assembly closed this past week with the usual amount of controversy. Rev. Cindy Rigby preached a sermon on the theme of this year’s Assembly, “do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with your God.” As if to emphasize every problem the PC(USA) has, Rev. Rigby made this astonishing comment, which is baffling to say the least.

“God isn’t very specific about what it is that we should do”

What a curious statement for a minister of the Word to make. Perhaps her Bible doesn’t have the Great Commission in it. Or the book of Acts. Or this group of verses which is just a small part of Paul’s theology of Ecclesiology.

Far from God “not being very specific about what…we should do,” the truth is, God was very specific about what both individual believers should do and the Body of Christ should do as they seek to live lives that glorify God. In doing so, success is guaranteed. As we are obedient to God’s will for our lives and for our church, we will move into the mainstream of His will and experience success like we could never have imagined.

1. First piece of advice: seek the Lord’s approval and know His Word, verses 14, 15

As Paul gives guidelines to the young preacher Timothy, his first bit of advice and instruction involves advice for Timothy the preacher to pass along to “reliable men” and to the people under his charge. Paul challenges Timothy to be “an approved workman” who is to “keep on reminding” believers of all the things Paul dealt with in the previous verses.

  • Don’t quarrel over words. In other words, God’s people are to stick to the essentials and defend them. Arguing over mere words is a waste of time; it is of no value. How bad is fighting over empty words or philosophies? Paul says it “ruins” people. That’s a serious consequence: the Greek word for “ruin” is katastrophe, from which we get our word catastrophe.
  • Know the Word. Rather than wasting time endlessly debating useless words, believers should put forth an effort to know the Word of God. Paul says to Timothy to “do your best,” which the Greek word spoudason, suggests that a person “make haste” and should be “zealous.”

There is a parallel verse in 1 Timothy 6:3-5 which is helpful understanding such “word quibbling”:

If anyone teaches false doctrines and does not agree to the sound instruction of our Lord Jesus Christ and to godly teaching, he is conceited and understands nothing. He has an unhealthy interest in controversies and quarrels about words that result in envy, strife, malicious talk, evil suspicions and constant friction between men of corrupt mind, who have been robbed of the truth and who think that godliness is a means to financial gain.

Far from getting sidetracked into endless arguments, Timothy must give a powerful personal example to leaders within the church and without. Hendriksen and Kistemaker make this astute observation:

Timothy must exert every effort so to conduct himself that even now before the bar of God’s judgment he stands approved.

Notice that Timothy will stand approved before God if he reaches two conditions:

a workman who has nothing to be ashamed of,
rightly dividing the word of truth

To “rightly divide with word of truth” is a very interesting phrase in the Greek. The word is orthotomounata and is found only here in the whole New Testament. It really means “holding a straight course.” Elsewhere in ancient secular writings, the word has been used to describe “a plowman who drives a straight furrow.” The meaning here, then, becomes very clear, especially in the Dutch Bible, where the phrase looks like this:

He who cuts the Word of God straight

Of course, this means handling the Bible in a proper, straightforward manner. This is so much more preferable to the useless words we should all avoid.

2. Second piece of advice: steer clear of false teaching, verses 16-18

The proper handling of God’s Word means that we must reject whatever teaching is in opposition to it. And so Paul continues his admonition against godless “chatter.” Lock paraphrases the phrase like this:

But to all these irreligious and frivolous hair-splittings give a wide birth.

Believers are to avoid getting caught up in “profane empty chatter.” It seems like Paul is overstating his case, but verse 17 is all-important:

Their teaching will spread like gangrene.

Getting caught up in discussions and debates that are best avoided will lead one deeper and deeper into more serious heresies. It all starts with seemingly unimportant discussions over seemingly trivial matters. But all the devil needs is a foothold.

Paul lists a couple of false teachers by name, and without going into detail, their false teaching involved the notion that the resurrection had already happened. Of course, it’s a silly teaching to those of us grounded in our faith, but to those with a weaker faith, their false teaching caused them to doubt their faith. What’s worse is that these two false teachers professed to be Christians! And they claim to know more than they really do. But, as if to give credence to the phrase “little knowledge is a dangerous thing,” we read this:

They want to be teachers of the law, but they do not know what they are talking about or what they so confidently affirm. (1 Tim. 1:7)

The question that comes to mind is, How can people believe such blatantly false teaching? Christians want to believe the best in people, and these false teachers were subverting the faith of some by their clever words. Ralph Earl suggests this:

They were evidently explaining the resurrection in a spiritual sense, equating it with regeneration, on the new birth. 1 Corinthians 15 is Paul’s extended answer to this false teaching, which was propagated by some at Corinth.

It’s easy to see how the truth can be manipulated by some to the detriment of others. Little wonder Paul warned Timothy to stay clear of all useless chatter! If it infects the hearer, it can spread through the body of their faith, like gangrene or cancer.

3. Third piece of advice: a word of encouragement, verse 19

Despite the seriousness of false teaching and the terrible consequences of dabbling in it, nothing can destroy the true Church of Jesus Christ. In spite of the subversion, the “solid foundation of God stands firm.” What does Paul mean by “solid foundation?” Given the context, Paul probably has in mind the solid foundation of God’s Word and the doctrines it contains. No false teacher is strong enough in himself to tear down what God has built up. Jesus Himself declared that not even the “gates of Hell” can quash the Church.

4. Fourth piece of advice: be kind and don’t argue, verses 22-26

Timothy, despite his youth, must be mature and avoid the pitfalls of youth. Even though he was probably in his early 30’s Timothy must continue to flee youthful lusts. The verb is in the present tense, meaning it must be continuous action. But fleeing from sin isn’t enough. Timothy must “flee to” something positive. Paul lists four things worth pursuing: righteousness, faith, love and peace. When one is busy striving for those things, avoiding what should be avoided will be easy.

Verse 23 is a powerful verse. Timothy is told to have nothing to do with “foolish and stupid arguments.” “Foolish” refers to the nerves, being dull or sluggish, and to the mind, being slow. “Stupid” means “uninstructed” or “ignorant.” “Arguments” is from a word that refers to “questions” or “debates.” Of these things, Paul advises Timothy simply to refuse involvement with. Again, Earl’s insight is priceless:

Such questions will be brought before you: refuse to even discuss them. Sometimes the wise pastor has to do this. Why? Because “they produce quarrels” and tend to divide the church and so destroy it.

But what do you do with a troublesome person who wants to argue? While this is addressed to Timothy as a pastor, this is good advice for all strong believers. Every believer must NOT quarrel with such a troublesome person, but rather he must be “kind” to him. The word also means “gentle.” And, with God’s grace, the believer needs to be willing to be patient with and instruct the erring person.

Conclusion

This is the “structure for success” as Paul outlines for the individual believer. If the believer could follow Paul’s teachings, they would experience success in their daily Christian walk and witness. But, as a final note. Verses 25 and 26 are worth considering as a summation for being obedient to the Word:

Those who oppose him he must gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth, and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will.

Even a troublemaker, while his empty words need to avoided, he himself should be approached and “gently instructed.” This really means that the troublemaker needs to be taught “in meekness” by those who have the knowledge. The reason for this is not so Timothy or the pastor can be proven right, but so that the person in the wrong may find correction and that they may “return to soberness” (that’s the thought of the Greek behind “come to their senses”). And it is knowledge that will change the person’s heart. Nobody needs to be “given up on” until the Lord indicates it’s time to do so.

What an awesome responsibility the mature believer has. He must avoid useless arguments, immerse himself in the Word, and gently confront the argumentative person and try to persuade them with knowledge of the Word. This is the structure for success.

Structure For Success: The Body of Christ

A Study of Acts 6:1-10

In those days when the number of disciples was increasing, the Grecian Jews among them complained against the Hebraic Jews because their widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution of food. So the Twelve gathered all the disciples together and said, “It would not be right for us to neglect the ministry of the word of God in order to wait on tables. Brothers, choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will turn this responsibility over to them 4and will give our attention to prayer and the ministry of the word.”

This proposal pleased the whole group. They chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit; also Philip, Procorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicolas from Antioch, a convert to Judaism. They presented these men to the apostles, who prayed and laid their hands on them.

So the word of God spread. The number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly, and a large number of priests became obedient to the faith.

Now Stephen, a man full of God’s grace and power, did great wonders and miraculous signs among the people. Opposition arose, however, from members of the Synagogue of the Freedmen (as it was called)—Jews of Cyrene and Alexandria as well as the provinces of Cilicia and Asia. These men began to argue with Stephen, but they could not stand up against his wisdom or the Spirit by whom he spoke.

Chapter six of Acts opens with a seemingly innocuous verse, but this verse has led centuries of speculation surrounding what Luke meant when he wrote “Grecian Jews” and “Hebraic Jews.” The purpose of this study is not settle this argument, but rather to examine the amazing success of the early church in light of the structure God ordained for it. It was not accident that the church grew so fast in those early years, and we will see that obedience to God’s instructions and employing His godly wisdom resulted in that undeniable success.

1. The Problem, verse 1

In those days when the number of disciples was increasing, the Grecian Jews among them complained against the Hebraic Jews because their widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution of food.

Luke is vague as he begins this chapter. We aren’t sure exactly when “In those days” refers to, but it seems likely that he has in mind the days immediately following the trial of the apostles and their concerted effort to preach and teach the Gospel of Jesus Christ in Jerusalem. A result of this hard work and concentrated effort was that the Christian church in that city grew at an astonishing rate. Because Luke doesn’t give us exact figures, we can only surmise what the membership of the Jerusalem church was by now. Kistemaker estimates that “the church doubled in size from the last figure Luke provided: five thousand men.”

Notice that the new converts to Christianity were called “disciples” by now. It is used here for the first time in Acts and means literally “learners.” Early on in the development of the Church, it was used only of the Twelve, but as the Church grew and grew, the word came to describe all believers in general. F.F. Bruce notes:

“Disciples” is perhaps the most characteristic name of the Christians in Acts.

In our modern minds we think of “discples” as “followers,” but they were not merely followers of Christ or followers of the Twelve. They were students; they were ones who learned the teachings of Christ through the words of the Apostles. To be a disciple was not merely signing the Jerusalem church register, but being an active learner of the ways of Christ.

That should describe church members today, but all too often it does not. Our churches seem to be populated not only by lazy preachers behind the pulpit, but but lazy pupils in the pews as well.
The number of the disciples was growing at a continual rate, as suggested by the Greek. It is a “golden rule” of Ecclesiology that the more members a church has, the more potential problems is has. This certainly was the case in Jerusalem at this time. The church grew, and the “complaining” started. The Greek word is often translated as “murmuring” and suggests the buzzing sounds bees make.

The complaining came from “Hellenists,” or Greek-speaking Jews. We know from the early chapters of Acts that many Jews came to Jerusalem from all over the world at Pentecost to worship. Apparently many of these devout Jews were elderly and wanted to live out the remainder of their lives in the holy city. Many, also, had accepted Christ’s Gospel and had become believers. Because they spoke Greek, they worshiped in their own synagogue and read from their own Scriptures, the Septuagint, the Greek Old Testament.

On the other hand, there were the Hebraic Jews, or Jews that spoke Aramaic. They worshiped in their own synagogues and read from the Hebrew Scriptures.

And the problem involved the daily distribution of food for widows, primarily food for the Hellenistic Jewish widows. Apparently with the increasing number of believers came an increasing number of Hellenistic widows dependent on relief from the Church. The Aramaic-speaking Jews were the majority in Jerusalem, but the widows in the minority group felt overlooked. Because of their newfound faith in Christ, they could no longer ask for or expect help from their Synagogues.

The first problem in the Church, sadly, is a common problem to this day. Many commentators note the prejudice that existed between these two groups, but the problem was a much deeper one and it has to do a prevailing attitude of envy. One person sees what another has and feels they are entitled to it. It is entirely probable that the Greek-speaking Jewish widows were unintentionally neglected, but their responsibility was not to complain, but to approach the leaders of the Church with their concern.

2. The Simple Solution, verses 2-3

So the Twelve gathered all the disciples together and said, “It would not be right for us to neglect the ministry of the word of God in order to wait on tables. Brothers, choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will turn this responsibility over to them.

What is particularly noteworthy is that the moment the Apostles were made aware of the problem, they gathered the believers together to propose a solution. They did not ignore the problem; they dealt with it straightway. Implicit in the Apostle’s swift action is the realization that spiritual and material needs are often intimately connected in Christian experience, and one affects the other.

At the meeting of all the believers, the Apostles presented a God-ordained solution and a simple lesson in pastoral theology: “It is not right for us to stop teaching the word of God to serve at tables.” In other words, the primary duty of the Apostles was to teach and preach the gospel of Jesus Christ. That is also the primary task of the pastor today. All other duties are secondary no matter how important they may be. Funerals, marriages, baptisms, committees , food banks, all these things are important, but they all take a backseat to the ministry of the Word of God to the people of God.

The solution was remarkably simple: qualified men in the church are able to perform certain duties, including the distribution of food to the Greek-speaking widows. Therefore, the Apostles proposed that seven men be appointed to this job.

Some observations about this solution.

  • Why seven? In the Bible, the number seven represents “fullness” or “completeness.”
  • While Luke does not refer to these men as “deacons,” the Apostles did ordain seven men to look after this particular need.
  • The qualified men had to meet two basic requirements: they had to have a good reputation and be full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom.

These are still the qualifications essential in Christian workers today. The seven candidates were to be chosen by the whole congregation. This was important so as to head off any complaints from any member of favoritism or preference for one person or group above another.

3. The Intentional Result, verse 4

[We] will give our attention to prayer and the ministry of the word.

The immediate result of this action was that the Apostles could devote themselves to the two most pressing needs of the Church, and the primary purposes for it’s very existence: prayer and the preaching the Word. F.F. Bruce offers an interesting take on this intentional result. Concerning prayer, Bruce wrote: “The regular worship of the church is what was meant.” In other words, whatever else the Church of Jesus Christ can be involved with, nothing takes precedence over the ministry of the Word of God.

4. Unintended Results, verses 5a, 7

This proposal pleased the whole group. So the word of God spread. The number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly, and a large number of priests became obedient to the faith.

Because the Apostles’ decision and solution was ordained by God and they were simply following God’s will, all the people were in accord with them, and they chose, curiously enough, seven men, all with Greek names, in an obvious attempt to make an overture to the Hellenistic Jewish believers. Luke writes that the solution “pleased” the church in Jerusalem. The word suggests a basic harmony between leaders and members. Whenever there is obedience to God and His Word, there will be harmony within the Church. This is one minor unintentional result of the Apostle’s decision.

Strife and disunity follow when church leaders work in opposition to God’s will and God’s Word.

As a sidelight, the first one chosen and mentioned was Stephen. The fact that Luke places him at the head of the list is likely due to the fact that he would become the first Christian martyr. Appropriately, Stephen means “crown,” and he was the first to receive the martyr’s crown.

Verse seven gives us the major unintentional results of this godly decision: The word of God spread and the number of disciples increased rapidly.

First, the Word of God spread. This was a natural result when those who were best qualified to preach and teach it were now free to do so because they weren’t mired in the day-to-day management of church business.

In a bygone era, ministers used to put the initials V.D.M. after their name. This was not some kind of academic or professional degree, but was an abbreviation of the Latin phrase Verbi Domini Minister, which means “minister of the Word of the Lord.” In the strictest sense, a pastor is not a minister of a local congregation, even though the Session or board of a local church oversees his work and the local church pays his salary. A pastor is a minister of Christ’s Gospel, he is a servant of God’s Word, and as such he must devote fully to the task of proclaiming the Good News.

And second, the church grew even faster because the Word was promulgated. It is the Word causes the Church of Christ to grow. The Church may be engaged in many, many worthy and worthwhile activities, and it should be, but it is the Word of God, preached faithfully, respectfully, and honorably that the Lord honors.


Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 409,427 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 282 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket