Posts Tagged 'Deacons'

Panic Podcast – Acts, Part 5

Today I want to focus on two problems the faced the early church in Jerusalem. Squabbling widows threatened to rip the church apart from the inside and persecution threatened to do the same thing from the outside.

 

GOD’S GREATEST CREATION, Part 3

Membership in the Church

The Church of Jesus Christ is made up of believers in Christ, called out from the world of sin, separated unto God, whether they be Jews or Gentiles. Members are those who acknowledge Jesus Christ as their personal savior, Matthew 10:32; Romans 10:9. Immediately upon conversion, one becomes a member of the church invisible, Hebrews 12:23. The life of a member of the Church corresponds with his profession in that he ceases the practice of sin, 1 John 3:6, 8.

While the Church is not the Kingdom of Heaven, it is part of the Kingdom of Heaven—the part we can see. Matthew 13 gives a series of parables illustrating the state of the Kingdom of Heaven today.  Even a cursory look at those parables shows us that many members of the visible church are Christians in name only, for they certainly are not living up to their potential as disciples of Christ!

It is the duty of members to gather for worship, spiritual ministry, and exhortation, Hebrews 10:25; 1 Thessalonians 5:11; Hebrews 3:13.

The spiritual quality of the Church

The spiritual quality of the Church is determined by the spiritual quality of its members. In the very early Church, the spiritual quality was very high, Acts 5:13, and the member’s complete separation from the world and sin made them a powerful witness in Jerusalem, Acts 5:14. The spiritual quality of the early Church was very different from that of the church at Laodicea, which boasted of its wealth and members, but was nauseating to God, Revelation 3:14—18.

The spiritual quality of a church is seen in—

  • The exercise of spiritual gifts often but not to excess, Romans 12:6; 1 Corinthians 14;
  • The teaching and practice of sound doctrine, 1 Corinthians 1:10;
  • Good and healthy fellowship between members, Ephesians 4:3;
  • The witness the church has in the community, Philippians 1:27;
  • Healthy unity within the congregation, 1 Peter 3:8

Duties of members in spiritual things

The primary duty of church members in spiritual matters is to assemble for worship, Hebrews 10:25; 1 Thessalonians 5:11; Hebrews 3:13. The results of regular fellowship in the Church include: (1) the creation of ideas, for example, of how to reach the lost; (2) accountability to one another; and (3) direction of energies in terms of service. A lopsided church is one that is all worship and no teaching; or all teaching and exhorting but no worship; all ideas and no action. A spiritually healthy church is one where the work of the Spirit is manifested in the work of the saints, Matthew 28:19; Acts 8:4.

Civic duties of members

The work of the Church is primarily spiritual in nature, but its members live and work in the world. Members of the Church are to take what they learn in Church and live lives that testify to Christ’s presence in their hearts. They engage in honest business and politics, have healthy marriages, and so on. A guiding principle is found in Matthew 22:21.

The Work of the Church

The work or the purpose of the Church is frequently misunderstood by its members. Here is what the work of the Church involves:

  • To preach salvation. Technically speaking, it is work of each member of the Church preach salvation; the job of the Church is to teach its members how to do that. Many members think the primary job of the Church is to save sinners. This is not so. The Church is the place where saints come to learn how to save sinners. Christ provided salvation, the Church expounds the Scriptures to its members, and they do the work of the ministry.

  • To provide a means of worship. Israel possessed a divinely appointed system of worship by which they approached God in all the needs and crises of their life. Similarly, the Church is to be the place where Christians gather for prayer, worship and testimony.

  • To provide a place of fellowship. Human beings are social by nature; we crave fellowship and an exchange of fellowship. It is most natural to fellowship with those who share the same interests and values. The Church provides fellowship based on the Fatherhood of God, the Lordship of Christ, in the warmth of the Holy Spirit.

  • To hold up a moral standard. The Church is supposed to be “the light of the world,” to show the world what true morality and ethics look like. The conduct of the members of the Church should expose moral corruption and ethical lapses in the community. The life of a Christian should set the example for others to follow.

Officers of the Church

An organization implies some sort of leadership structure. This leadership structure in the early church was very simple, consisting of three distinct offices.

  • Pastor, elder, bishop, overseer, shepherd. These terms denote essentially the same office in the New Testament. See Acts 20:17, 28; 1 Peter 5; Titus 1; etc. So, episkapos, poimen, didaskalos, presbuteros are Greek terms translated variously as “elder,” “shepherd,” pastor,” or “overseer” but describe the same office within the church. Those who hold this office are concerned with the spiritual well-being of the congregation.

  • Deacons. Coming from the Greek diakonos, the one who is a deacon in the church cares for the physical needs of the church. Interestingly, while their duties are different from those of elders, their qualifications are the same.

  • Deaconess. In the early church, this seems to have been a distinct office. Pheobe is called a deaconess, Romans 16:1.

It doesn’t take a lot study to see how different denominations structure their ecclesiastical bureaucracy from each other.  Hierarchical denominations, like the Roman Catholic Church and the Anglican Church, have complicated levels of church leadership while Congregation churches have the simplest.  Somewhere in the middle we find Presbyterian-type bureaucracies which are, arguably, closes to the New Testament pattern.

PHILIPPIANS, Part One

From Slaves to Saints, 1:1, 2

Some two thousand years ago, an itinerant preacher and occasional tentmaker was unceremonially thrown into a Roman prison because he created a “public disturbance.”  It was from that dark, damp prison that he dictated a short letter that may have taken up all of one or two pages of rough paper.  Very few of us would even know who the Roman emperor was at that time, and even though Nero was said to have been a very prolific author, nothing remains of anything he wrote.  On the other hand, the “apostle Paul” is a name recognized by millions upon millions of people all around the world; by Christians, Jews, and unbelievers alike.  While not all of Paul’s writing has survived the intervening 20 centuries, some has, and his short letter to his friends in Philippi one that has and is a source of great comfort to all who have read it.

No doubt Paul would be befuddled by his “success.”  He was, after all, just a “preacher.”  He was an evangelist who, in his travels, got to know many people as he founded and preached in churches all over the Roman Empire and beyond.  Little did know that people in 2010 would still be reading and studying some of his letters.

As we read Paul’s letters, they all have certain characteristics.  He greets his readers in the name of the Lord.  Sometimes his letters were written to churches—large and small—and sometimes he was addressing a single person.  In some of his letters he rebukes and corrects a congregation or individual for some deviation from the Word of God.  Paul’s main concern was for the health of the Church, which would lead to healthy individual believers.

Of all the letters Paul wrote to churches, this one is the most personal.  It contains no rebukes; there were no major problems in the church, apparently.  All the warnings Philippians contains are cautionary; they are warning to take care and watch out.  Within the 104 verses of this letter, the names and titles of Jesus Christ occur over 50 times; clearly He is the reason for this letter.

1.  The setting:  Town and church

During the time of Paul, Philippi was not a big city, but it was an important one.  It was named after Philip, the father of Alexander.  In 42BC, a great battle between Brutus and Octavian took place at Philppi.  Octavian (Augustus) prevailed and he, as the leader of the new state, rebuilt Philippi and filled it with his own soldiers, making it a military outpost and colony of Rome.  Because of its strategic location, and its fairly rapid grown, it became the chief city of Macedonia.

The citizens of Philippi were diverse and highly educated.  The town was filled with Greeks, Asians, and Romans and all were devoted to their various philosophies and religions.  Temples abounded in Philippi, and the when the Gospel of Jesus Christ was first brought there, it was readily accepted.

The church there was founded by Paul and his friends during his second missionary journey, sometime in 52 AD.  There were very few Jews living in Philippi, and so Paul had to use a different tact in presenting the Gospel.  Normally, he would visit the local synagogue and reason with its members; but in Philippi, there was no synagogue because there weren’t enough Jews to sustain one.  What would Paul do?  Acts 16 tells us how Paul adapted his approach to fit the circumstances—

On the Sabbath we went outside the city gate to the river, where we expected to find a place of prayer. We sat down and began to speak to the women who had gathered there. One of those listening was a woman named Lydia, a dealer in purple cloth from the city of Thyatira, who was a worshiper of God. The Lord opened her heart to respond to Paul’s message. When she and the members of her household were baptized, she invited us to her home. “If you consider me a believer in the Lord,” she said, “come and stay at my house.” And she persuaded us. (Acts 16:13—15)

And so Philippi had its first convert; Lydia, a business woman who also has the distinction of being the first European convert to Christianity.  Also an early convert was a slave girl whose conversion caused all kinds of problems for her employer, who used her talents to make money.  These early conversions caused such a stir, that Paul and Silas were imprisoned.  In fact, they were viewed as such trouble makers that the Philippian jailer chained them up in an inner cell.

About midnight Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns to God, and the other prisoners were listening to them. Suddenly there was such a violent earthquake that the foundations of the prison were shaken. At once all the prison doors flew open, and everybody’s chains came loose. The jailer woke up, and when he saw the prison doors open, he drew his sword and was about to kill himself because he thought the prisoners had escaped.  (Acts 16:25—27)

We know that story; not one single prisoner escaped, which led to the conversion of their jailer and his whole family.

From this very simple beginning the church was constituted.  A fairly wealthy business woman, a former-slave girl, and a low-ranking, upper middle class government official and his family made up the first congregation in Philippi.  Truly in Jesus Christ there is no distinction of male or female, rich or poor, free or slave!

After Paul and Silas left to continue their work, Luke probably stayed behind to help organize the congregation into a genuine local Christian church.  It is also probable that the congregation at Philippi was as persecuted as Paul; they therefore had a special kinship with him and were intensely loyal to him.

According to what Paul wrote to the Corinthians (2 Corinthians 8:1—2), the church at Philippi fell into financial problems, but they never let their circumstances affect their fidelity to Christ or their generosity to other churches.  Out of their poverty, they were able to give to help other struggling congregations and even Paul himself.

2.  Greeting: from the servants, verse 1

Paul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus.

A simple greeting belies its power.  Paul the great apostle; Paul, the eloquent expositor of Scripture; Paul, the complier and organizer of Christian theology, not only refers to himself as a “servant,” but he links his name to a junior pastor, Timothy.   Why did he do that?  As to why he mentions young Timothy, he had traveled with Paul on his second missionary journey and was therefore present when the Philippian church was birthed.  He had visited the town with Paul on a subsequent journey (Acts 20) so the congregation would have known Timothy.  Imagine how glad they would have been to know that Timothy had remembered them!

Timothy was very close to Paul on many levels and was no doubt being groomed to continue Paul’s work after Paul’s time was up.

Paul does not use his title, “Apostle,” in this letter even though he had no problems using it elsewhere.  This is because this letter is much more personal that his other congregational letters.  In fact, this letter to the people at Philippi has more in common with Paul’s very personal letter to Philemon that to any other of his letters.  Paul is not interested in stressing his credentials; these people knew who Paul was.  He loved them and they loved him right back.

Paul refers to himself and Timothy as “servants” of Jesus Christ.  The Greek word used is doulos, and is often translated as “slave.”  Why does Paul describe himself as a “slave” or “servant” of Jesus Christ?  The common answer is that doulos emphasizes his complete submission and dependence on Christ.   Doulos is not a technical name for Paul and Timothy’s office, but rather is characterizes their willing service to Christ.

And yet it means much more than that.  Paul and Timothy (and all believers, for that matter) had been literally bought with a price and were therefore owned by their Master, the One who bought them, Jesus Christ.

You were bought at a price; do not become slaves of men.  (1Corinthians 7:23)

What does it mean to be a slave of man?  The exact opposite of being a slave of Christ! It means letting the whims of human beings dictate not only your thoughts but your behavior as well.  It means fearing man and preferring the ways of the world over the way of Christ.  Paul would have none of that!  Indeed, being a slave of man leads only to bondage and a life of drudgery.  Contrast that the liberty that comes from being a slave of Christ’s—

You have been set free from sin and have become slaves to righteousness.  (Romans 6:18)

But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.  (Romans 7:6)

The liberty that comes from being a slave of Christ is something a sinner can only dream of!  Real freedom and liberty is only found in Christ.  To be a slave of Christ is to be free from sin.

3.  Greeting: to the saints, verse 1b

To all the saints in Christ Jesus at Philippi, together with the overseers and deacons.

The word “saints,” hagiois, means literally “holy ones” or “set apart ones.”  What an apt description of what a Christian is supposed to be:  set apart.  Christians belong to God and are to be like God.  Christians are His precious possessions, purchased and belonging wholly to Him.   It does not mean the folks in the Philippian church were “sinless.”  It simply means that they have been set apart by God to serve Him in the world.

“Saints” refers to the state of Christians in Christ.  As the New Testament uses the term, a Christian is a “saint” merely because he is “in Christ.”  To be “in Christ” is to be controlled by Him; to be under His control and His influence.  It means to be held in the very palm of His hand.  “In Christ” is one of Paul’s favorite phrases; he uses it 8 times in the four chapters of this letter and almost 50 times in all his letters combined.

William Hendriksen offers his definition of what a “saint” is:

A saint, then, is a person to whom the Lord has shown great favor and upon whom, accordingly, there rests great responsibility.  He who is a saint (2 Cor. 1:1) must remember that he has been called to be a saint (Rom. 1:7; 1 Cor. 1:2).

In other words, at some point in the life a saint, his life must line up to his calling.

Not only are members of the Philippian church addressed, but also the leadership of that church; the overseers and deacons.  This is the very first mention of “overseers and decaons” in the New Testament.  The word “overseer” comes from the Greek episkopois, which is often translated as “bishop.”  In New Testament times, the episkopois referred to the spiritual leader of a local congregation, and sometimes a local church may have had more than one “overseer,” and sometimes just one.   “Overseer” seems to have been equivalent to “elder,” which was a word very common is Jewish communities.  Since Philippi had few Jews, they used the more common “overseer” to name their church leaders.

“Deacons,” diakonois, is a word with a beautiful meaning:  “those who serve.”  From what we learn in Acts, deacons looked after the physical needs of a congregation; the elders looking after the spiritual needs.

What is really interesting in this greeting is that Paul addresses the members, the spiritual leaders, and the administrative leaders of this church all together, addressing them all as “saints.”  In God’s sight, the pulpit is no higher off the ground then the pew.  Any organization has to have its leaders, including the church, and God has made provision for this, but it is a false distinction to elevate the leaders of the church above the most average member of that church for all are saints.

The church really is a most amazing organism.  The Philippian church reflects many churches of today.  Not many churches spring into being, packed to overflowing with wealthy members who just can’t wait for Sunday and Wednesday night to get here!  In fact, many churches struggle into existence, gaining a member here and there growing ever-so-slowly, with only a few members never missing a service.  Most churches are like the Philippian church; a rag-tag collection of people from all walks of life, brought together by the Holy Spirit, united under the banner of the Word of God, and bound together in love.  With all the bickering and gossip and destructive behavior that characterizes so many churches today, it’s a testimony to the boundless grace and mercy of God that He considers us “saints,” co-workers, co-heirs with, and ambassadors of Jesus Christ.

May the Lord, through the work of the Holy Spirit within us, help us to live up to our calling as “saints” and “holy” people.

GOD’S CHURCH, GOD’S WAY, 6

Church Officers, 1 Timothy 3

So far in Paul’s letter to Timothy, the senior pastor has given the younger pastor advice on his own personal ministry in Ephesus—resisting false teachers and false teaching.  Then he proceeded to give instructions on how to conduct the public worship service properly, including whom to pray for, who may lead in prayer, and how they ought to pray.  Now, Paul will give Timothy some “administrative” advice, namely, choosing the right people for the offices of elder and deacon.  Paul gets very specific with his requirements, and since he gave young Pastor Titus a similar list of qualifications in his letter to him, we must conclude that the qualifications for those seeking positions of leadership in a local church are universal and not just limited to people in first century Ephesus.

1.  A worthy ambition, 3:1

Here is a trustworthy saying: Whoever aspires to be an overseer desires a noble task.

This is the second of five “trustworthy” or “reliable” sayings, with the first one back in chapter 1—

Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners—of whom I am the worst. (1:15)

This first “trustworthy saying” introduced some significant theological teaching relating to Christ’s redemptive work.  The second “trustworthy saying,” though, has nothing to do with matters related to faith or salvation, but rather to a worthwhile and honorable aspiration:  leadership.  The New English Bible captures the essence of how Paul introduced his teachings on elders and deacons:  “To aspire to leadership is an honorable ambition.” In other words, there is nothing wrong with wanting to be a leader, and in fact, the desire to be a leader is commendable.

The phrase “aspires to” in the tNIV is translated “sets his heart on” in the NIV and speaks of a noble ambition or pursuit.  The thought is that this person is actively seeking such an office and that he is doing what he can to obtain it.  If one has the qualifications to be an elder or deacon, it is fitting that they should seek out that office.

The office being sought is that of “an overseer.”  This is a rendering of one Greek word, episkope, and the KJV chooses to use the word “bishop.”   This is not an altogether incorrect translation of episkope, but it is misleading to modern readers.  We have come to associate “bishop” with an ecclesiastical administrative office, a step above that of “priest” or “pastor.”  We will deal with what episkope meant to Paul and Timothy in the next verse, but for now, Paul is simply telling Timothy that is right and proper to seek leadership positions.

Such a position is a noble one, says Paul.  Being a leader, in the Church or outside the Church, is not only a noble position, but it is also a position that carries tremendous responsibility.  On this point, Ralph Earl’s observation is worthy:

One needs to be sure that such a desire is not an expression of carnal pride, but that rather it reflects a deep consecration to the work of the church.

No doubt this is the very reason for the strict qualifications that follow.

2.  For overseers, 3:2—7

What exactly is an “overseer?”  If we read Titus 1:6—7, we find an almost identical list of qualifications presented there, not for an “overseer” but for an “elder,”  and the Greek word there is presbyteros.  Originally, the Greek word episkopos came from the organization of secular societies, and simply meant “one who leads.”   In Acts 20:17, we read where Paul sent for the “elders,” presbyteros, of the church at Ephesus.  Then is verse 28 he calls them “overseers,” episkopos. For Paul, then, the terms are interchangeable.  We might say that an elder is an overseer; elder being the name of the office, overseeing God’s house describing what they do.

In the early Church, the pastor of a church was called many things, including:  elder, bishop, shepherd, and minister.  So Paul gave Timothy a list of no less than 15 qualifications an elder and/or a pastor must meet.   The first and unspoken requirement for elders is that they must be a man.  Paul does not specify that in writing, but it is implicit throughout his other 15 qualifications.   Those who aspire to the office of elder and/or pastor need to be men, not women.  It should be stated clearly that Paul is not addressing the leadership of women in the world, only that the Church of Christ must observe God’s divine order within His Church.  Paul is also not teaching that women should never preach or teach in the Church.  His only point is that elders must be men.

As we look at these 15 qualifications, it should be crystal clear that any leader in the Church must have a pristine reputation among two groups of people:  those inside the Church and those outside the church.

An elder, then, must be:

  • Above reproach.   In the Greek, this comes from a single word which means “not to be laid hold of.”  Within the Body of Christ, then, an elder’s behavior should be such that no charge of wrong-doing can stick to them.  Of course, elders and pastors are often blamed for all kinds of things that go wrong in a church, but Paul’s point is that though they may be accused of things, the accusations will prove groundless.  Paul is not suggesting an elder must be sinless or faultless, but that it is proper that elders and ministers be judged by a higher standard than the average member of the congregation.   The average church member may be forgiven character defects and failures that would sink a pastor and end his career.  Gould observed, There are some things which a merciful God will forgive in a man but which the church can never forgive in its ministry.
  • Faithful to his wife.  Some have used this qualification to suggest that an elder or pastor must be a married man.  This is not what Paul meant and the tNIV’s translation is a good one.  If an elder is married, he must be a faithful husband.  It does not suggest that a divorce in the past disqualifies a man from being an elder; just that he has one wife and that he be a good and faithful husband to his wife.  An elder and pastor must be a man of unquestioned morality.
  • Temperate.  This refers to an elder’s mode of living; his tastes and habits.  Though the Greek word often refers to the opposite of drunkenness, what Paul has in mind is a kind of “soberness” or “circumspection” in how an elder and pastor lives his life.  “Such a person lives deeply,” wrote William Hendriksen.  If an elder is wealthy, he does not flaunt his wealth.  If an elder is a leader in business, he does not work himself to death in pursuit of money or fame.  An elder is not given to any kind of excess; his life is balanced, calm, careful, and he is filled with a desire for spiritual things as opposed to temporal things.
  • Self-controlled.   An elder is a man with a sound mind; he is not easily swayed by emotional impulses, like anger or lust.  This character trait was especially important in Ephesus, where men were tempted by false teachings and alluring the priestesses of pagan religions.
  • Respectable.  In regards to morals in general, an elder must be respected and therefore virtuous.  The basic meaning of the Greek word kosmios, “of good behavior” (KJV), “modesty,” really means “orderly.” An elder’s life should be so ordered that he garners the respect of those within and without the church.
  • Hospitable.  A hospitable person is one who is literally “a friend to strangers.”  In the early days of the church, this was a most important trait.  Christian evangelists and itinerant preachers roamed the countryside, traveling from community to community preaching and teaching the Gospel, and the depended on the hospitality of Christian families for support and shelter.   Hospitality is a wonderful trait in the motel-hotel age of today, for it encourages a healthy fellowship between believers, and when believers are close, they are more apt to care for each other.
  • Able to teach.  Every elder should be able to teach, and should be gifted in this area to some extent.  We often apply this qualification to the pastor, but it is not his exclusively.  The word “able” should be “qualified,” meaning that an prospective pastor, who is an elder, should be properly trained and educated.  It also means that an elder has himself been taught; he has sat under sound Biblical teaching and is able to teach others.
  • Not given to drunkenness.   Literally, this means “one who does not linger beside his wine.”  Being a teetotaler is not what Paul means; he simply says that an elder should never be “tipsy,” or live under the influence of too much wine.   What a sad commentary on any society that such a stipulation was even necessary!
  • Not violent but gentle.  Literally this means “not a striker.”  An elder must not be a violent man.  Paul is referring to a man who is ready to fight at the drop of a hat; a man whose fists are always clenched because he has a “chip on his shoulder.”  An elder should be the opposite; he should be “gentle.”  A gentle elder is one who is able to defend the Gospel, but is willing to yield his personal rights if necessary to keep the peace.
  • Not quarrelsome.  In other words, an elder and pastor should not be argumentative or contentious.  “Not quarrelsome” means he should be averse to fighting, both physically in the sense of brawling, but also in the sense of conversation; an elder must not be quick to bicker or nitpick.
  • Not a lover of money.  The love of money is the root of all evil (1 Timothy 6:10) we are taught.  We are also taught that one cannot serve two masters, God and money.  In the case of a pastor, he should execute his calling without regard to how much (or how little) he is paid.  In the case of elders, they should be focused more on spiritual things than on the accumulation of more and more wealth.  Of course, we assume that elders will have jobs and responsibilities outside the church, but one who aspires to be an elder, will put their ministry in the Body of Christ above all other pursuits.  If a man is not willing to do that, they have no business being an elder.

The first two verses list a dozen qualifications for elders briefly and in quick succession.  The next three are given at length, with the first one qualification taking up two verses:

He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him, and he must do so in a manner worthy of full respect.  (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God’s church?)

An elder, then, must be a good husband and a good father.  The idea is that if a man cannot exercise godly and proper authority at home in the raising of his children, he is disqualified to be an elder.  J.B. Phillips seemed to capture the sense of this verse in his translation—

He must have proper authority in his own household, and be able to control and command the respect of his children.

Many an elder or pastor has suffered in their work for the Lord because they were busy saving other people’s children while ignoring their own.  A pastor’s first responsibility is not to the church that called him and that is paying him, it is to his family.  Why? Verse 5 is the logical answer:  if a man has a good and decent family life, it is evidence that he has the innate capabilities to run a church.

Verses 6 and 7 stipulate that an elder must be a man of maturity:

He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil.  He must also have a good reputation with outsiders, so that he will not fall into disgrace and into the devil’s trap.

Like the qualification that an elder not be a wino, this one seems like a no-brainer!  But, verse 6 gives us a little insight into the Ephesian situation.  For some reason, Paul felt it necessary to stress the fact that nobody should be promoted too quickly in Christian service.  A church must be lead by mature leaders; elders and pastors must be seasoned before they can assume their respective offices.  The danger is all-too clear:  an immature man who becomes a spiritual leader will suffer the stinging judgment that results in pride and conceit.  This was Lucifer’s downfall and has been the downfall of many a church leader who thought himself above all others.

Since Timothy himself was relatively young, Paul probably is referring to spiritual and emotional maturity, not necessarily to chronological age.

Finally, part of being mature and even-minded is that an elder will have the respect of those outside the church in which he serves.  This is especially true of elders, as opposed to the pastor.  The pastor spends the bulk of his time among the people of his church, but an elder, who has a job or a business, spends the bulk of his time among the unsaved.  It is essential that he have the respect of those who know him if he is to serve as a leader in his church.  If an elder does not have the respect of his community, he brings “reproach” upon the whole church.

If a church paid attention to Paul’s teaching on elders, much grief would be avoided down the road!

2.  For deacons, 3:8—13

Clearly from what Paul taught concerning elders, an elder must be a man, not a woman.  Not so with the office of deacon, the qualifications for “deaconesses” (“women” in many translations) are sandwiched in between those for deacons in verse 11.

The office of deacon is first seen in Acts 6:1—6, where the church in Jerusalem chose a group of men to “serve tables” so that the apostles would be free to preach and teach the Word.  The concept of a “deacon” is that of a worker; one who tends to the physical needs of the Church and congregation, while the elder tends to their spiritual needs.

The word “deacon” is the English version of the Greek diakonos, which is a simple word that means “servant.”  In the Gospels, diakonos is most often translated in that way.  It is interesting that Josephus and other writers of his day used the word diakonos for those who waited on tables.  Though not used in Acts 6, we see the first technical use of the word in Philippians 1:1—

To all God’s holy people in Christ Jesus at Philippi, together with the overseers and deacons.

The references to “deacons” and “deaconesses” in the New Testament are few and far between, but their work is no less important than that of the elder, nor are they inferior in any way to an elder.  Being a deacon, like being an elder, is a worthy ambition and it is a glorious task.  In fact, serving as a deacon is based upon the love and concern Christ had for His followers.  Caring for the physical needs of believers must be close to Christ’s heart for whatever is done for the least of His brothers, He considers it having been done for Him.

Like elders, Paul gives a list of qualifications that deacons must meet.  A deacon must be:

  • Worthy of respect.  A deacon must be “dignified.”  The Greek word is semnos, and is very difficult to translate into English.  The sense that Paul is trying to communicate is that deacons will live their lives and conduct themselves in such a way as those who see them will respect them.
  • Sincere.  In the second place, a deacon must be sincere, that is, they must mean what they say and say what they mean.   The Greek word, dilogos, means that a person will not talk out of both sides of their mouth.  This is the only time this word appears in the New Testament and it paints a vivid picture!  A deacon will practice what they preach.
  • Not an abuser of wine.  This is a stronger statement than what Paul wrote in relation to elders.  The qualified deacon is moderate in his use of wine if he drinks any at all.
  • Does not pursue dishonest gain.   While elders are to “not love money,” the admonition to deacons is much pointed.  A deacon must not be an embezzler or a pilferer, or a shady business operator.  They need to be honest in all their business dealings.
  • Men of spiritual integrity.  Verse 9 is a requirement that goes far beyond any of his requirements for elders.  The phrase “mystery of the faith,” according to Gutherie, “is a common Pauline expression denoting not what is beyond knowledge, but what, being once hidden, is now revealed to those with spiritual discernment.”  A deacon, then, is a spiritually enlightened individual.
  • Men of proven worth.  Only those who have been tested should serve in the Church.  This does not mean that prospective deacons need to be tested by the church board; it means that they should have a proven track record of a dedicated and consecrated life.

Verse 11 deals with deacons who are women, NOT the wives of deacons, as is suggested by some translations, which is completely unsuited to the context and also to what we know about the first century church.  Many deaconesses are mentioned throughout the New Testament:  Phoebe and Priscilla to name just two.  The syntax clearly indicates that Paul is addressing deaconesses:  “The overseer therefore must be…Deacons similarly (must be)…Women similarly (must be)…”  Hendriksen points out that deaconesses are a group by themselves rendering special service in the church, just like elders and deacons.  To this group of servants, Paul gives these qualifications:  A deaconess must be—

  • Worthy of respect.  Like deacons and elders, deaconesses must be women who are respected both in their church and in their community.
  • Not malicious talkers.  In the Greek, this is but one word which means “slanderous, accusing falsely.”  In other words, a gossiper need  not apply for the position of deaconess.
  • Temperate.  This is essentially the same word used of elders in verse 2.
  • Trustworthy in everything.  To say the least, this is an all-encompassing requirement.  Hendriksen gives some excellent examples of this kind of woman:
    • The two Deborah’s (Gen. 35:8; Judges 4:4)
    • Jochebed (Heb. 11:23)
    • Naomi and Ruth (Ruth 1:15—18)
    • Hannah (1 Sam. 1:15—16; 1:22—2:10)
    • Ichabod’s mother (1 Sam. 4:21)
    • Abigail (1 Sam. 25:3, 25, 36)
    • Zarephath’s widow (1 Kings 17)
    • The Shunammite woman (2 Kings 4:8)
    • Huldah (2 Kings 22:14)
    • Queen Esther (Esther, whole book)
    • Elizabeth (Luke 1:5—6)
    • Mary, mother of Jesus (Luke 1:46—55; 2:19; Acts 1:14)
    • Anna (Luke 2:36—37)
    • Mary and Martha (Luke 10:38—42; John 11; 12:1—8)

Hendriksen goes on and on listing more and more examples of the kind women in Scripture Paul has in mind.  Against this list of women of excellence, Scripture mentions numerous evil women, including Potiphar’s wife (Gen. 39:7—33) and Jezebel (1 Kings 21:5—10).

With verse 12, Paul returns to the deacons, men, with a final requirement:

A deacon must be faithful to his wife and must manage his children and his household well.

We can never overstate the importance the Apostle placed on proper leadership within the Body of Christ.  As far as he was concerned, with the right pastor, elders, deacons, and deaconesses in place, a church could not help but press forward, being an effective witness for the Kingdom of Heaven in their community.   Choosing the right church leadership is vitally important:

A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches.  (Proverbs 22:1)

That proverb applies to the individual and to the Church.  God’s church, done God’s way will observe what is written in Scripture, will obey what is written in Scripture, and will enact what is written in Scripture.  God’s church, done God’s way cannot fail, but will always prosper in everything it does.  God’s church, done God’s way will function in full submission to the teachings of God’s Word.

(c)  2010 WitzEnd

Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 333,608 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 286 other followers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket