Posts Tagged 'Money'

Panic Podcast – What Do You Have?

PANIC PODCAST

Series – Stewardship: Giving What You Have to God

Today – What Do You Have?

 

Panic Podcast – Ecclesiastes

On today’s podcast, we learn important things and the uselessness of religion, the importance of approaching God the right way, and the value on money.

 

The Worst Financial Decision Ever!

A Study of Ananias and Sapphira

Acts 5:1-11

What happened to Ananias and Sapphira is legendary in the Church and is frequently used by pastors to encourage their people to give generously to the church. But is that the lesson being taught?

The story of Ananias and Sapphira really begins during the last two verses of chapter 4, which tells the story of a very generous man named Barnabas who sold a field he owned and gave his money to be distributed to the needy of the Church. Barnabas was the kind of man every church wants to have, not just because he was generous but because he was of excellent character; always quick to appreciate the good in others, unselfish and not at all interested in self-glory. Luke inserts Barnabas here as an example of all that was good in the very early Church.

That brings us to chapter 5 and the story of Ananias and Sapphira, whose case is opposite that of Barnabas, though it was meant to look the same.

1. The conspiracy, 5:1, 2

It is hard to imagine there being hypocrites in the church so soon after it started! But hypocrites there were and the story of these two hypocrites is in stark contrast to the the story of Barnabas. It is equally difficult to understand why insincere, selfish people even desire to join the church and cause to strife and division.

Luke details the conspiracy between husband and wife succinctly in these two verses. Both of these people were undoubtedly believers; Ananias means “God is gracious” and Sapphira is an Aramaic word meaning “beautiful.” Luke uses the small word “also” to link what this couple did to what Barnabas did in the previous story. They wanted the same acclaim or notoriety that Barnabas got when he sold his property, so they imitated what he did, with one exception: instead of giving all the proceeds of the sale to the church, they held some back.

There was nothing wrong with that; nobody expected them to give all the money to the church, but Luke’s use of the word nosphizo suggests deception, because in addition to “keeping back,” the word also means “purloined.” Lake and Cadbury observe in this regard:

[This word] occurs not infrequently in Hellenistic prose…and always implies (a) that the theft was secret; (b) that part of a larger quantity is purloined…(c) it is to be noted further that the verb also involves breaking a trust.

Keeping for themselves what they were ostensibly giving to the Church was a premeditated act, which made the sin ever more serious.

2. Peter’s discernment, 5:3, 4

Kistemaker points out some interesting parallels to this account in the Old Testament. In the Garden of Eden, Satan entered in and enticed Eve to sin against God (Genesis 3:1). Her sin affected the entire human race. When the Israelites consecrated themselves to God by observing the rite of circumcision and celebrating the Passover feast (Joshua 5:1-12), Achan’s sin of stealing from God effectively destroyed Israel’s moral purity; his sin affected every single Israelite. Ananias’s deception could have destroyed the purity of the early Church, which was displayed to all through their love, unity, and harmonious relationship with each other. These three examples serve as ominous warnings to the Church of Jesus Christ today.

This story has provoked much discussion among critics of the Bible. Peter appears so callous and uncaring. Ananias is not given a chance to repent. His wife is struck dead without warning. All of these things lead some critics to suggest this story never happened; that it was a ficticious “legend” used to keep early believers in line.

However, we believe this incident did take place; we have no reason to believe that it did not. Guided by the Holy Spirit, Peter sensed that Satan was at work in the heart of Ananias and he proceeded to ask the man five questions:

· How is it that Satan has so filled your heart? Perhaps better than any leader of the Church at that time, Peter understood what it was like to allow Satan to persuade a person to do something wrong. Satan persuaded him to deny Jesus three times. Satan put into the heart of Judas Iscariot the intent to betray Jesus. In a moment, Peter realized what could happen to the fledgling church if Satan entered into the heart just one believer. Not only the believer himself, but the whole congregation needed to be made aware of the power of Satan.

· [Why have] you have lied to the Holy Spirit? This really is the root of Ananias’ sin. It was not holding back some of the money. It was not giving a false impression to the church. It was lying to the Holy Spirit. Calvin wrote that when he lied to the Holy Spirit, Ananias expelled God from his life and deliberately sinned against the Holy Spirit.

· [Why did you keep] for yourself some of the money you received for the land? God loves a cheerful giver, not a dishonest one (2 Corinthians 9:7). There was nothing wrong with holding back some of the money, but it was wrong to lie about it.

· Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? Interestingly, these questions reveal that the early Christians did not practice communal living and communal ownership of property but only shared that which would help others in their poverty.

Ananias could say nothing. He permitted Satan to fill his heart, refused to worship God, and made money the object of his worship. Despite that, he wanted the praise of God’s people for his pretend generosity. But a Christian cannot serve two masters.

· What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to men but to God.” Ananias committed an evil in the sight of man and God. Man always stands in the presence of God, who sees everything we do (Prov. 15:3).

3. The result of sin, 5:5-10

From the purely physical realm, Ananias’ sudden death could have been due to the shock and shame of being found out. But the Greek word Luke used for his death is ekpsycho is the same word used of Sisera’s death in the LXX, which was a judgment from God, and in the New Testament it is always used in that regard. Whatever the physical reason for Ananias’ death, ultimately the causal agent was God Himself.

The result of Ananias’ death was stunning and exactly what God wanted. And great fear seized all who heard what had happened. God’s desire is for the Body of Christ to remain pure and untainted by sin. We of the genteel generation view God’s action in a harsh light. This is unwarranted. God removed the blame of Ananias’s sin by removing both him and his wife from the Body of Christ. He God tolerated this sin, the church would have no defense against the charge that God tolerated sin and deception against Him and His people. At least at the very beginning, the Church He created would be free from that.

We should note, though, that while Ananias’ death produced fear in the congregation, it produced no joy. Young men came and collected his body and it was treated with respect. The Greek word for “wrapped up” (verse 6) is systello, and was frequently used to describe the careful wrapping up of a body in preparation for burial. Because of the hot and humid climate, he would have been buried very quickly.

No sooner had her husband succumbed to God’s judgment, than his wife showed up, oblivious to what happened to him. The tragic episode was repeated about three hours later; she lied and dropped dead. Ernst Haenchen writes,

All this is handled without pity, for we are in the presence of the divine punishment which should be witnessed in fear and trembling, but not with Aristotelian fear and pity.

Scholarship is divided as to what took Sapphira. It was God’s judgment, but what happened to her? Was it shock? A heart attack? To show you how the mind of a theologian works, consider what the foremost conservative New Testament scholar wrote. In his long and distinguished career, F. F. Bruce wrote three commentaries on the book of Acts. In his first, 1949, Bruce wrote that Sapphira died of guilt and shock of her husband’s sudden death. In his second work on Acts, he said that “the shock produced by the sudden sense of the enormity of such a crime caused their death.” Finally, in Mr. Bruce’s third commentary, he wrote: “It was an evident act of judgment.”

Verse 11 seems redundant, but it is significant for very important thing: it is the very first time in the New Testament we read the word “church” (ekklesia) in describing the called out members of Christ’s Body.

4. Some lessons

In his commentary on Acts, Bible scholar Ralph Earl eloquently observed that the sin of Ananias and Sapphira showed contempt for God, vanity and ambition in the offenders, and utter disregard of the corruption which they were bringing unto the church. In fact, they thought more of the display made at the Apostle’s feet that of the offense before God’s eyes.

Darby, in his excellent Synopsis of the Bible, wrote these very insightful words:

God cannot endure evil where He dwells; still less where He does not dwell. He exercises all patience until there is no remedy within. The more His presence is realized and manifested, the more He shows Himself intolerant of evil. It cannot be otherwise. He judges in the midst of His saints, where He will have holiness.

Of the question as to why we don’t see more instances of Ananias and Sapphira today, Darby’s words see to me to be reasonable. Perhaps it is simply because there is so little of God’s presence left in His church today.

The Lord is My Helper

A Short Study of Hebrews 13:5-8

Keep your lives free from the love of money and be content with what you have, because God has said,
“Never will I leave you;
never will I forsake you.” So we say with confidence,
“The Lord is my helper; I will not be afraid.
What can man do to me?”
Remember your leaders, who spoke the word of God to you. Consider the outcome of their way of life and imitate their faith. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.

If you were to take a scenic view of Hebrews, you would see that chapter 11 is the “faith chapter,” chapter 12 is the “hope chapter,” and chapter 13 of Hebrews is the “love chapter.” Or, another way to look at it this: chapter 10 deals with the Christian’s privilege, chapter 11 the Christian’s power, chapter 12 outlines the Christian’s progress and finally chapter 13 shows us the Christian’s practice. (McGee).

Chapter 13 is a wonderful chapter to study, and it becomes obvious that believers should be concerned with the needs of others because Christ died for believers. He acted for others, demonstrating that love means work and that in faith there must be action. The writer to the Hebrews shows the readers what it means to live a life of love.

1. Independence toward money, verses 5-6

Throughout Hebrews, the author, who was clearly a Jew, continually makes allusions to the Old Testament, comparing it to Christ and His New Covenant with believers. Most times the comparison is in favor of Christ and the New Covenant: Jesus Christ is superior in every way to Moses and the patriarchs, as great as they were. The New Covenant in Christ is vastly superior to the Old Covenant. But here, in chapter 13, the writer to the Hebrews makes allusions to the Decalogue, the Ten Commandments, and what is noteworthy is that he writes as though they are still in force.

Verse 5 deals with sins of covetousness. The selfish man lives a life, not of live, but in pursuit of his selfish aims, whether sexual or financial, without the slightest regard to others. The KJV renders the opening of this verse like this: Let your conversation be without covetousness, and is a broader way of translating the Greek. The NIV reads: Keep your lives free from the love of money. The sense of wording deals with a believer’s way of life; it should be lived without wanting what one does not have. There is kind of play on words here; two kinds of “affection” or love are encouraged in verses one and two. The Greek word is phileo, or “brotherly love,” but here is a kind of love to avoided: for money and the things it can buy. How does one show love or affection for people: by being concerned about their well-being and by demonstrating faith and love the way Christ did for helpless sinners. Jesus did not simply tell people He loved them, he demonstrated that love by action. However, when one spends their time in pursuit of money or things, they do so at the expense of being concerned about others. On this point, the words of Richard Taylor are illuminating:

Restless eyes and feverish desires are incompatible with the rest of soul and incongruous with a profession of holiness. If we would be satisfied with fewer things and less pretentious houses, we would have more poise, more quietness of spirit, more inward happiness, and certainly more time for prayer, worship, service, and the cultivation of the finer values in life.

No, the Bible does not teach laziness or resignation to a life of poverty. The writer to the Hebrews is not anti-ambition. However, many times Christians elevate the “protestant work ethic” to heights out of line with overall teaching of Scripture. Hard work is a virtue for we glorify God with the work of our hands. Sadly, too many Christians put their work or careers above the needs of others; they foolishly believe that their security in life depends on what they do. According to this verse, God’s people are secure no matter what happens because God is always with them.

There is nothing wrong with material possessions, as long our depth of love for and faith in God exceeds our desire for things. For the devoted Christian, the choice should always be love for God, not love for things; the devoted Christian should prefer the possession of God’s presence to the possession of things. The devoted Christian need never worry about security because God’s promise of His abiding presence is the best pledge of security.

Yet, even the most devoted Christian occasionally gives into the sin of fear or the temptation to covet what they do not have. The antidote to fear and temptation is the confidence they have in God’s provision, as verse 6 indicates. To the readers of this epistle, fear of punishment was always on their horizon, and they needed to be reminded that God was never going to forsake them.

Leon Morris makes the observation: Despondency is foreign to Christians. Believer should be able to “speak with confidence.” The Greek word is is tharrountas, and indicates an attitude of courage and trust. There are three point to this confidence.

  • The Lord is the believer’s helper. This means that, based on the previous verse, God is always with the believer, He may be counted on to be there in times of need.
  • The believer has no fear. The One who promises to help is the all-knowing, all-powerful I AM. There is no reason to fear.
  • No power is greater than the Lord, therefore no mere human being can succeed in anything they attempt to against the one who trusts in God.

2. Christian Leadership, verses 7, 8

There are some who take verse 7 to mean that church members should be absolutely loyal to their pastor. This is probably due to the way the KJV translates it in the present tense. However, most modern translations interpret this verse as referring to leaders of the past. We could read this verse like this: Be mindful always of those who were ruling you, whose faith you should continually imitate, making note of the outcome of their way of life. We don’t know exactly who the writer has in mind; some have suggested he is thinking of elders in the church who have gone on, other think he has in mind the martyrs he wrote about in previous chapters, and still others think he is referring to the patriarchs of the faith. We can get a clue when we notice what these leaders did: they “spoke the word of God to you.” This suggests that the writer has in mind those who preached the Gospel to them in the past; the apostles and the first generation missionaries, many of whom were martyred on account of that very activity.

The word translated “outcome” is a rare word in the Bible, seen only one other time, in 1 Cor. 10:13, and is taken by some to refer to their deaths. Since their life of faith is what these leaders are to be remembered for, it seems more likely that the author to the Hebrews has in mind the ultimate fruit of their lives, which was good, not evil. Their way of life was one of practical holiness, marked by love for others.

This is, I think, a great need in the Church today. There is a tendency to rewrite history and belittle the great spiritual leaders of the past. However, what is evident is that what Church needs is not newer programs or more memorials, but rather a careful study of the lives of those who founded it. Instead of belittling or despising them, or a “new way of doing things,” we should be inspired by their lives of devotion, and strive to match them in depth of commitment to God. No human being is perfect, but it is only as we line up with our founding fathers and the faith that motivated and sustained them, that we can steer a straight course for our future.

Verse 8 is actually a “transition sentence,” introducing a brief section on doctrine. However, we will limit our observations only to this profound and succinct verse. Earthly leaders, no matter how spiritually powerful they are, come and go. Only Jesus is always there. The faith by which we live is not based on the leaders we study, even though we have just been encouraged to imitate their lives. The focus of our faith must always be Jesus Christ. For only He is eternal and unchangeable.

Jesus of Nazareth, who walked the plains of Galilee, was the Messiah. This must forever be a part of the believer’s thinking. What Jesus was yesterday, in the days of His incarnation, and what He is today at the right hand of God the Father, He will be forever. This is a profoundly moving verse, for it shows that when the Son of God became a man, He became a man for all eternity. Part of Him changed forever, so that today, there is a glorified man at God’s right hand, the intercessor for all people.

For the readers of this epistle, and for believers today, this is a powerful motivator in the believer’s quest to live a life of love. We should never fear that Christ is somehow different today than He was in Bible days, and that He will be different at some point in the future. Past or present or future makes no difference to Him. The word “forever” is really a Greek phrase which means “into the ages” and refers to the never ending future. There is no adequate way to convey the depth of meaning in this short verse. No matter what the future hold, no matter how long eternity is, no matter how many ages the universe passes through, Jesus Christ will remain the one fixed, never unchanging point. As God’s revelation to us, Jesus Christ is final, and will never “be superceded or supplemented.”

How a believer lives their lives is based on this certainty. Jesus Christ will never be superseded.


Bookmark and Share

Another great day!

Blog Stats

  • 408,881 hits

Never miss a new post again.

Archives

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 282 other subscribers
Follow revdocporter on Twitter

Who’d have guessed?

My Conservative Identity:

You are an Anti-government Gunslinger, also known as a libertarian conservative. You believe in smaller government, states’ rights, gun rights, and that, as Reagan once said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Take the quiz at www.FightLiberals.com

Photobucket